[Paraview] Mesa tests failing

Kevin H. Hobbs hobbsk at ohiou.edu
Wed Jul 16 13:36:52 EDT 2008


On Wednesday 16 July 2008 12:39:46 pm Berk Geveci wrote:
> Hmmm. I wonder if Mesa is doing something different on your machine
> than Hythloth. Is it possible that it is going through some hardware
> accelerated path instead of full software? I know very little about
> Mesa but I know that it can utilize certain graphics hardware for
> accelerated rendering.
>
> -berk
>

It's possible. The nvidia driver is loaded and used by X.  

The various builds find their correct libraries:

$ for all in /home/kevin/kitware/ParaView3_*Build/bin/paraview ; do  echo $all ; ldd $all | grep libGL.so ;done
/home/kevin/kitware/ParaView3_Build/bin/paraview
	libGL.so.1 => /home/kevin/mesa/lib64/libGL.so.1 (0x00007f7d69cd0000)
/home/kevin/kitware/ParaView3_mesa_7.0.3_Build/bin/paraview
	libGL.so.1 => /home/kevin/Mesa-7.0.3/lib64/libGL.so.1 (0x00007f1a39c59000)
/home/kevin/kitware/ParaView3_nvidia_Build/bin/paraview
	libGL.so.1 => /usr/lib64/nvidia/libGL.so.1 (0x0000003d2b800000)

Mesa was not built with DRI. I thought that DRI was the 
only way to get _any_ sort of acceleration with mesa.

Acording to lspci the graphics hardware is a :
nVidia Corporation Quadro NVS 290 (rev a1)

I'm using gcc (GCC) 4.3.0 20080428 (Red Hat 4.3.0-8) which Hythloth is not.
I suppose I could try a different compiler just for yucks.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://www.paraview.org/pipermail/paraview/attachments/20080716/228d1208/attachment.pgp>


More information about the ParaView mailing list