[Paraview] [ParaView] question about speed

[Michael Geppert]

Hi Berk,

I'm doing some testing about that at the moment, I'll tell you here, if 
I think there is a difference.

Michael


Berk Geveci schrieb:
> Hi Michael,
>
> Do you think there is still a difference between 3.2 and cvs?
>
> -berk
>
> On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 6:40 AM, Michael Geppert <MichaelGeppert at gmx.net> wrote:
>   
>> Thanks, ParaView is working faster now.
>>
>> Michael
>>
>> Berk Geveci schrieb:
>>     
>>> Did you compile both yourself? What happens if you set
>>> CMAKE_BUILD_TYPE to Release.
>>>
>>> -berk
>>>
>>> On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 12:47 PM, Michael Geppert
>>> <MichaelGeppert at gmx.net> wrote:
>>>
>>>       
>>>> Hello,
>>>>
>>>> I'm using the ParaView development version (3.3.0) and I'm observing a
>>>> speed loss compared to the releases (reading, filtering and animating of
>>>> bigger data sets takes about 30% more time). Is there any special flag
>>>> or part in the development version, that is slowing everything down? I
>>>> tested ParaView 3.3.0 from cvs and the release 3.2.1, both compiled with
>>>> shared libraries..
>>>>
>>>> Thanks in advance
>>>> Michael
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> ParaView mailing list
>>>> ParaView at paraview.org
>>>> http://www.paraview.org/mailman/listinfo/paraview
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>         
>>>       
>>     
>
>