[Paraview] Loading data PV2.x versus PV3

Berk Geveci berk.geveci at kitware.com
Fri Jan 18 16:39:04 EST 2008


It is. However, this is easy to fix. Do we need to have file series
support for Xdmf? Jerry is adding support for time to the Xdmf format.
If we support file series, which one has priority, native time or file
series?

-berk

On 1/18/08, Jose Renteria (Cont, ARL/CISD) <jrenteria at arl.army.mil> wrote:
>
> Is this also true for Xdmf files, I am seeing similar behavior?
>
> Berk Geveci wrote:
> >> If I load ParaViewData3.2 test data
> >> "singleSphereAnimation_source93T0000.vtp" with Paraview 3.2.1 the data
> >> is loaded and when I hit the start animation button nothing happens. It
> >> seems like Paraview 3.2.1 does not recognize/link the other vtp files
> >> (0-10).  Is this expected behavior for Paraview 3.2.1?
> >>
> >
> > Yes. Because XML-based VTK files support time natively and through pvd
> > files, we decided to no longer support file series of XML-based VTK
> > files. File series work for legacy VTK files as well as some other
> > formats that have no time support. If you have a series of vtp files,
> > you need to write a pvd file that points to them with the appropriate
> > time values to load them as a series.
> >
> > -berk
> >
> >
> > On 1/18/08, Jose Renteria (Cont, ARL/CISD) <jrenteria at arl.army.mil> wrote:
> >
> >> I build ParaView 3.2.1 on my redhat4 64 linux machine and it looks like
> >> the animation or the way data is loaded is no longer working or has
> >> changed since Paraview 2.x.
> >>
> >> If I load ParaViewData3.2 test data
> >> "singleSphereAnimation_source93T0000.vtp" with Paraview 2.x the data is
> >> loaded and when I hit the start animation button Paraview loops through
> >> each of the vtp files (0-10).
> >>
> >> If I load ParaViewData3.2 test data
> >> "singleSphereAnimation_source93T0000.vtp" with Paraview 3.2.1 the data
> >> is loaded and when I hit the start animation button nothing happens. It
> >> seems like Paraview 3.2.1 does not recognize/link the other vtp files
> >> (0-10).  Is this expected behavior for Paraview 3.2.1?
> >>
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> ParaView mailing list
> >> ParaView at paraview.org
> >> http://www.paraview.org/mailman/listinfo/paraview
> >>
> >>
>


More information about the ParaView mailing list