[Paraview] Will using RPath interfere with CPack on a Mac?

Mike Jackson mike.jackson at imts.us
Thu Aug 14 17:26:26 EDT 2008


This is on ParaView CVS from yesterday. I ran "make" then "sudo make  
install". After a _really_ long time and lots of "warnings" about Qt  
Frameworks that were NOT found ( I have Qt built as DyLibs), there is  
NO paraview.app in the installation location. Everything else got  
installed, even my own plugin and associated application. The  
paraview.app that is in the build directory is only 500K, so that  
isn't a complete application.

CMake 2.4.8 (Built on my machine)
OS X 10.4.11 (Intel)
Xcode 2.5 tooling.

Don't know what else to do. I guess I could blow away my source and  
build directories and start again?

-- 
Mike Jackson


On Aug 14, 2008, at 4:29 PM, Berk Geveci wrote:

> I don't think make install calls the script (maybe it used). Make  
> install actually works but only installs unix-style command line  
> executable and associated libraries (pvbatch, pvserver etc.) I have  
> been making 2 different distributions: one for that .app, one for  
> the command line tools. If anyone has suggestions for doing it  
> otherwise, please let me know.
>
> -berk
>
>
> On Thu, Aug 14, 2008 at 3:55 PM, Samuel Crow  
> <samuel_crow_work at rocketmail.com> wrote:
> I thought that "make install" just called that script internally.   
> It has been working on the stable release source.  Does the stable  
> release do more that doesn't get done when invoking the script from  
> the terminal?  Also, whether you do "make install" or invoke the  
> script you have to be logged in as the administrator or neither of  
> them will work.
>
>
> --- On Thu, 8/14/08, Berk Geveci <berk.geveci at kitware.com> wrote:
>
> > From: Berk Geveci <berk.geveci at kitware.com>
> > Subject: Re: [Paraview] Will using RPath interfere with CPack on  
> a Mac?
> > To: "Mike Jackson" <mike.jackson at imts.us>
> > Cc: samuel_crow_work at rocketmail.com, paraview at paraview.org
> > Date: Thursday, August 14, 2008, 7:40 PM
> > "make install" will probably work in 3.4 but until
> > then we are stuck with
> > the script. By the way, I make the paraview binaries using
> > that same script
> > on Tiger. I think it makes some assumptions that may not
> > work for you. How
> > does it fail? I cannot imagine it failing such that the
> > bundle is not even
> > created. It is more likely that the bundle is incomplete if
> > the script
> > fails. Note that the script is a hack and it does produce
> > bunch of errors
> > that can be ignored.
> >
> > On Thu, Aug 14, 2008 at 3:08 PM, Mike Jackson
> > <mike.jackson at imts.us> wrote:
> >
> > > This does NOT work on my 10.4.11/Xcode 2.5 system.
> > There are lots and lots
> > > of errors during that script and the paraview.app
> > never gets created.
> > > I do "make install", which is the way I
> > _thought_ I was supposed to build
> > > the .app bundle.
> > >
> > > --
> > > Mike Jackson   Senior Research Engineer
> > > Innovative Management & Technology Services
> > >
> > >
> > > On Aug 14, 2008, at 12:51 PM, Berk Geveci wrote:
> > >
> > > Run Applications/Client/CreateBundle.sh in your build
> > tree which will
> > > hopefully create a bundle that works.
> > >
> > >
> > >
>
>
>
>
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.paraview.org/pipermail/paraview/attachments/20080814/303579b5/attachment.htm>


More information about the ParaView mailing list