[Paraview] PV3/OS X/Qt 4.3 Compile error

[Mike Jackson]

Looking in the FindQt4.cmake about line 490 is the following:

   # Set QT_QTDESIGNER_INCLUDE_DIR
   FIND_PATH(QT_QTDESIGNER_INCLUDE_DIR QDesignerComponents <======
     PATHS
     ${QT_INCLUDE_DIR}/QtDesigner
     ${QT_HEADERS_DIR}/QtDesigner
     NO_DEFAULT_PATH
     )

Shouldn't we be looking for QDesigner? or are we _really_ wanting to  
find QDesignerComponents? The latter of which does NOT have a Headers  
folder in the framework, at least under Qt 4.3

Not sure if this is the root of the problem or not. I am trying to  
wade through the FindQt4.cmake file to figure what is going on.
-- 
Mike Jackson   Senior Research Engineer
Innovative Management & Technology Services


On Jun 20, 2007, at 10:08 AM, Berk Geveci wrote:

> Hmmm. Puzzling. Clint, have you compiled with Qt 4.3 yet? I have been
> using Qt 4.2.2 and 4.2.3. My build process is simple:
> * Compile and install Qt (I used /opt/qt-4.x.x)
> * Configure paraview, set path to qmake
> * Compile
>
> So far, I built on a Mac Pro, MacBook Pro, Mac Mini (intel and ppc),
> all running 10.4.9 with Xcode 2.4.1. I use make to build, not Xcode.
>
> -berk
>
>
> On 6/20/07, Mike Jackson <imikejackson at gmail.com> wrote:
>> I am using Cmake 2.4.6 Release. Do I need to move up to a cvs version
>> of cmake?
>>
>> Is there maybe a problem with a "non-standard" Qt 4.3 installation
>> path? (Mine is in /Developer/Toolkits/Qt-4.3)
>>
>> Other than that I am not sure what the problem could be although I am
>> willing to spend some time trying to track down the problem.
>>
>>
>> --
>> Mike Jackson   Senior Research Engineer
>> Innovative Management & Technology Services
>>
>>
>> On Jun 20, 2007, at 9:39 AM, Berk Geveci wrote:
>>
>> >> I just got done compiling against Qt 4.3 as shared libraries  
>> and the
>> >> compile completed just fine. So I am going to assume there is a
>> >> problem compiling against Qt Frameworks versus Qt Shared Libs.
>> >
>> > That is not a good assumption. I always compile against Qt  
>> frameworks.
>> > In fact, that is what I have been using to make binaries since the
>> > beginning of the ParaView 3 project. I would take a look at Clint's
>> > message:
>> >
>> > I assume you're using an older version of CMake than me (I'm using
>> > 2.4.6)?
>> > Qt4 support in CMake has been patched a bit since we started
>> > ParaView3.
>> > If that's it, then rebuilding Qt as shared libs instead of  
>> frameworks
>> > probably won't make a difference.
>> >
>> > -berk
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> ParaView mailing list
>> ParaView at paraview.org
>> http://www.paraview.org/mailman/listinfo/paraview
>>
>
>
> -- 
> Berk Geveci
> Kitware Inc.
> 28 Corporate Drive
> Clifton Park, NY, 12065