[Paraview] January snapshot of ParaView III

[Bonnie Smithson]

I found out that a commercial license for Qt is over $3000.  If I cut over
to Qt, will I have everything I need to work with it in the GNU
implementation?  

Why did you change to Qt from KW Widgets?  Is there some feature they
lacked?  Or is a matter of the fact that some developers at Sandia National
Labs and Elemental Technologies preferred it?

-----Original Message-----
From: Berk Geveci [mailto:berk.geveci at kitware.com] 
Sent: Tuesday, January 23, 2007 12:20 PM
To: Bonnie Smithson
Cc: paraview at paraview.org
Subject: Re: [Paraview] January snapshot of ParaView III

I would suggest starting from ParaView 3. ParaView 2 and 3 GUI
implementations are completely different. It will not be a
straightforward change to port a GUI built on top to ParaView 2 to
ParaView 3.

-berk

On 1/23/07, Bonnie Smithson <bonnie.smithson at otismed.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
> Will KW Widgets be completely replaced by Qt in Paraview III?  Is the KW
> Widgets version going to be obsoleted?  I am planning on building an
> application on top of Paraview, and want to get some insight into whether
or
> not the KW Widgets code I develop will be easy to port or if it will be
> wasted effort and when I will need to cut over to a new version.
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> ParaView mailing list
> ParaView at paraview.org
> http://www.paraview.org/mailman/listinfo/paraview
>
>
>


-- 
 Berk Geveci
 Kitware Inc.
 28 Corporate Drive
 Clifton Park, NY, 12309