[Paraview] Re: Python interface differences between ParaView 2.6 and ParaView III

Fabian Braennstroem f.braennstroem at gmx.de
Mon Feb 19 14:46:29 EST 2007


Hi Milan,

thanks, I just tested the latest snapshot, it was build with python...
Now, I pretty excited about some more examples :-)

Greetings!
Fabian

Milan Frank schrieb am 02/15/2007 09:31 AM:
> Hi Fabian,
> 
> you are right, you have to switch on the ParaView embed Python
> support. It is the PARAVIEW_WRAP_PYTHON cmake constant (in PV 2.6).
> Then it is necessary to use the pvpython.exe as the python
> interpreter. The wiki example should work ;-)
> 
> Good luck!
> Milan.
> 
> 
> On 14/02/07, Fabian Braennstroem <f.braennstroem at gmx.de> wrote:
>> Hi Milan,
>>
>> I am actually interested in using python together with paraview too;
>> unfortunately I was not able to run any small python example until
>> now (by the way, the only example I found was the small example for
>> version III on the wiki).I looks like that I have to compile
>> paraview for using python; at least I could not find it in the
>> latest snapshot an in  2.6. Do you have any hints about using python
>> together with paraview? Maybe, you got some small understandable
>> examples?
>> Would be nice!
>> Fabian
>>
>> Milan Frank schrieb am 02/13/2007 05:46 PM:
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> recently I have tested my Python script with ParaView 3 executive. The
>>> script has been developed with Python interface of ParaView 2.6.
>>>
>>> So far, I have noticed several changes in the interface (from 2.6 to 2.9) :
>>> 1) I was in need to explicitly specify render interactor style (there
>>> is no longer a default one).
>>> 2) UpdateDataInformation method is no longer part of the vtkSMSourceProxy.
>>> 3) I am getting "RenderModuleHelper not set" error from vtkSMLODDisplayProxy.
>>>
>>> At this point I have stopped my experiments and decided to post my question.
>>>
>>> Is now the right time to migrate to the ParaView 3?
>>>
>>> I guess there is several more things different. So it will cost me not
>>> negligible effort to accommodate my code to the changes. I am
>>> concerned about the amount of modification most likely to happen in
>>> the near future in the server manager part (and its python interface)
>>> of ParaView 3.
>>>
>>> Any hints will be appreciated as they will help me to plan my work better.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Milan
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> ParaView mailing list
>>> ParaView at paraview.org
>>> http://www.paraview.org/mailman/listinfo/paraview


More information about the ParaView mailing list