[Paraview] Probe filter Input

[shawn mckenziie]

I have made the necessary changes as far as i can see:
a) a second input was added to the .xml to account for the desired object
probe
b) <InputProperty name="Source"    line in the .pvsm was modified to match
the .xml

I will update my source with the latest cvs version, as this is still
necessary for my changes as well, correct?

Thanks for the help
Shawn

On 5/19/06, Berk Geveci <berk.geveci at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> You are going down the wrong path. Look at these posts:
> http://public.kitware.com/pipermail/paraview/2006-March/002747.html
> http://public.kitware.com/pipermail/paraview/2006-March/002818.html
>
> Your problem is very similar in that you want to change the hard-wired
> input of the probe filter (Stephen wanted to change the input of the
> streamline filter). I will forward you the configuration files for the
> stream tracer. Looking at those, you should be able to figure out how to
> write a new configuration for a probe filter.
>
> -Berk
>
>
> On 5/19/06, shawn mckenziie <shawn.mcknezie at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> I wish to make the probe filter take in any source as an input object .
> The current Probe filter calls the "GetInput" method to set the input as a
> line or point, but when i call this method with a general object, my filter
> does not appear on the filter list.
>
> this input will allow any object so i should be ok. In the vtkProbeFilter
> code i cannot find any method SetInput so i am assuming it is inherited from
> above somewhere, since it works for a point/line already.
>
> Should i have to change my SetInput call? any suggestions appreciated.
> thanks
>
> _______________________________________________
> ParaView mailing list
> ParaView at paraview.org
> http://www.paraview.org/mailman/listinfo/paraview
>
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://public.kitware.com/pipermail/paraview/attachments/20060519/93675894/attachment.html