[Paraview-developers] VS 2012

[owen.arnold at stfc.ac.uk]

Agreed. We have no interest back porting. If the current version compiles
with vs2012, that's fine for us.

Owen.

On 13/02/2013 18:23, "Biddiscombe, John A." <biddisco at cscs.ch> wrote:

>ParaView 3.10 was released in March 2011 (before visual studio 2012).
>Current paraview versions compile just fine with vs2012, These patches
>are not necessary with 3.14.x or 3.98.x. (Not a good use of time back
>porting fixes for old versions IMHO).
>
>JB
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: paraview-developers-bounces at paraview.org
>[mailto:paraview-developers-bounces at paraview.org] On Behalf Of
>owen.arnold at stfc.ac.uk
>Sent: 13 February 2013 13:23
>To: paraview-developers at paraview.org
>Cc: martyn.gigg at stfc.ac.uk
>Subject: [Paraview-developers] VS 2012
>
>Hi,
>
>My colleague has been experimenting with building ParaView with VS 2012.
>There are a few easily fixable compilation problems. I've attached these
>as a diff. This diff has been made against version 3.10.1, but it looks
>like the same issues need fixing in the latest source code. Do you think
>it would be possible to make these source-code fixes in time for your
>next release? Also, when do you plan to add VS 2012 to your target builds
>http://open.cdash.org/index.php?project=ParaView?
>
>Thanks in advance,
>Owen.
>
>-- 
>Scanned by iCritical.
>

-- 
Scanned by iCritical.