[Paraview-developers] Open Source question

[Berk Geveci]

Utkarsh is right.

-berk


On Wed, Aug 7, 2013 at 1:46 PM, Utkarsh Ayachit <utkarsh.ayachit at kitware.com
> wrote:

> AFAIK, including the ParaView license and mentioning somewhere in your
> documentation/web-pages that it's based on ParaView Superbuild is
> sufficient. But I'll let Berk respond with the official answer.
>
> Utkarsh
>
> On Wed, Aug 7, 2013 at 1:10 PM, Joshua Murphy
> <Joshua.Murphy at lasp.colorado.edu> wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > I am new to the whole open-source model of doing things, and I have a
> > question:
> >
> > If I were to use the ParaView Superbuild CMake code as a base for
> > building my plugin toolkit, how should I go about attributing it?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Josh
> > _______________________________________________
> > Paraview-developers mailing list
> > Paraview-developers at paraview.org
> > http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/paraview-developers
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://public.kitware.com/pipermail/paraview-developers/attachments/20130812/929757ad/attachment.htm>