[Paraview-developers] {Int, Double}VectorProperties now require a {Int, Double}RangeDomain element?
Cory Quammen
cquammen at cs.unc.edu
Thu Oct 11 23:36:43 EDT 2012
Kyle,
Could you merge it? I don't have sufficient privileges.
Thanks,
Cory
On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 5:26 PM, Kyle Lutz <kyle.lutz at kitware.com> wrote:
> Looks good to me. I've +2'd it on gerrit.
>
> -kyle
>
> On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 9:39 PM, Cory Quammen <cquammen at cs.unc.edu> wrote:
>> Kyle,
>>
>> I've proposed a patch on gerrit
>> (http://review.source.kitware.com/#/c/7866/) that essentially
>> implements John's suggestion and have added you as a reviewer.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Cory
>>
>> On Tue, Oct 9, 2012 at 10:21 AM, Biddiscombe, John A. <biddisco at cscs.ch> wrote:
>>>> That is true. The new property widgets for each property are created
>>>> according to the property's domain. We can add in some code to handle the
>>>> case in which no domain is specified and just create a simple text box. Would
>>>> that work for your use-case? If so, could you please submit a bug report and
>>>> assign it to me?
>>>
>>>
>>> Surely it would be much more intuitive to simply create a range domain for all int/double vector properties if one wasn't specified, you can always define
>>> <IntRangeDomain name="range" />
>>> And not specify a min max. Why not just use this as the 'default' unless the user actually overrides them. No real need to put it in the xml?
>>>
>>> I am aware that ints might be
>>> <BooleanDomain name="bool"/>
>>> But that's an override. Yes?
>>>
>>> JB
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Cory Quammen
>> Research Associate
>> Department of Computer Science
>> The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
--
Cory Quammen
Research Associate
Department of Computer Science
The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
More information about the Paraview-developers
mailing list