[Paraview-developers] Gatekeeper Review Summary

[David Cole]

Somebody (Kyle Lutz and/or John Woodring?) mistakenly used the wrong
bug number in a VTK or ParaView commit message. It inadvertently added
spurious information to the following bug entry:

  http://public.kitware.com/Bug/view.php?id=12318

Would somebody care to claim this typo and transfer the information to
the correct bug before I delete the notes off of this bug....? I'm not
sure what the correct bug is here, or I'd just do it myself.


Thanks,
David C.


On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 3:02 PM, Utkarsh Ayachit
<utkarsh.ayachit at kitware.com> wrote:
> Folks,
>
> Following topics were merged into master. There was some confusion
> with the VTK submodule, so if the developers can please verify that
> their VTK changes made it into the repository, that'd be great. We are
> working on making it easier to resolve conflicts with VTK submodule.
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 12400-gradientfilter-compute-q-criterion
> 12417_spreadsheet_decorator_undo
> 12402-generic-geometry-filter
> 12362-expose-version-in-pvsc
> 12411_fix_representation_example
> 12423_fix_amr_dual_clip
> 11626_cth_amr_clip_pass_variables
> 12332_client_driven_view_updates
> random_mask_points_2
> 12422_plot_edges_fix_ghost_cells
> 12398-VisTrails-fix
> 12341-static-plugin-loading
> 12370_fix_python_source
> sync_vtk_master
> 12407_plot_arrays_reset_in_state
> vtkWindBladeReader-time-fix
> 12243-fix-volume-rendering-with-global-ids
> 12410_fix_colors_in_x3d
>
> Following topics were Ignored since they are not merged into next.
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> NetCDFCF-zero-length-variable-fix
> adios
> VR-Plugin
>
> Utkarsh
> _______________________________________________
> Paraview-developers mailing list
> Paraview-developers at paraview.org
> http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/paraview-developers
>