[Paraview-developers] MPI Parallel Sorting
Biddiscombe, John A.
biddisco at cscs.ch
Wed Sep 15 04:27:35 EDT 2010
This one looks interesting
http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.86.8588
comes with code.
A Novel Parallel Sorting Algorithm for Contemporary Architectures
http://gauss.cs.ucsb.edu/~viral/PAPERS/psort/html/psort.html
JB
-----Original Message-----
From: paraview-developers-bounces at paraview.org [mailto:paraview-developers-bounces at paraview.org] On Behalf Of Utkarsh Ayachit
Sent: 24 August 2010 15:01
To: Moreland, Kenneth
Cc: ParaView Developers; Greenfield, John A; Thompson, David C
Subject: Re: [Paraview-developers] MPI Parallel Sorting
Actually, Joe Hennessey from JHU sent me a reference:
http://portal.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=608798
We are taking a look at this one. It seems to do what we want.
Utkarsh
On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 7:34 PM, Moreland, Kenneth <kmorel at sandia.gov> wrote:
> No it does not. The spreadsheet on the client carefully loads only the
> portion of the data that is visible. If you were to pull all the data to
> the client, you would run out of memory and kill it.
>
> In short, that won't work.
>
> -Ken
>
>
> On 8/23/10 5:16 PM, "Scott, W Alan" <wascott at sandia.gov> wrote:
>
> Greenfield has a really good point - doesn't the data for the whole
> spreadsheet have to be passed to the client for display? Thus, couldn't you
> just sort on the client?
>
> Alan
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: paraview-developers-bounces at paraview.org
> [mailto:paraview-developers-bounces at paraview.org] On Behalf Of Utkarsh
> Ayachit
> Sent: Monday, August 09, 2010 8:48 AM
> To: ParaView Developers; Thompson, David C
> Subject: [Paraview-developers] MPI Parallel Sorting
>
> Folks,
>
> I am looking at the long standing feature request to add support for
> sorting in the spreadsheet view. Our use case is that we have a large
> array is distributed among N processes.
> We want to end up with that array sorted but still distributed among
> all processes. Most implementations I am looking at end up creating
> one large sorted array on one of nodes. Does anyone know any approach
> that avoids this generation of a large array on the root node?
>
> Utkarsh
> _______________________________________________
> Paraview-developers mailing list
> Paraview-developers at paraview.org
> http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/paraview-developers
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Paraview-developers mailing list
> Paraview-developers at paraview.org
> http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/paraview-developers
>
>
>
>
> **** Kenneth Moreland
> *** Sandia National Laboratories
> ***********
> *** *** *** email: kmorel at sandia.gov
> ** *** ** phone: (505) 844-8919
> *** web: http://www.cs.unm.edu/~kmorel
>
>
_______________________________________________
Paraview-developers mailing list
Paraview-developers at paraview.org
http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/paraview-developers
More information about the Paraview-developers
mailing list