[Paraview-developers] Moving to hdf5-1.8.x

Berk Geveci berk.geveci at kitware.com
Thu Mar 18 17:05:54 EDT 2010


Can we target the next patch release (3.8.2 I guess) for this? It will
be 3 months (or less) after the 3.8 branch.

-berk

On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 4:22 PM, Utkarsh Ayachit
<utkarsh.ayachit at kitware.com> wrote:
> John,
>
> I understand your pain :), but this is just too late to commit such a
> (arguably) major change. We are planning on a CVS freeze come Tuesday
> and a branch on Friday. Besides it's only a matter of few months
> before the next official release of ParaView, so you can soon tell
> your users that yours plugins will work against an official release.
>
> Utkarsh
>
> On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 4:10 PM, Biddiscombe, John A. <biddisco at cscs.ch> wrote:
>> It is a big change conceptually speaking, but there are few places that are actually using it in paraview - a handful of readers and that's about it really.
>>
>> I am trying to kill pv-meshless off and use only plugins, but unless I upgrade paraview cvs, I need to maintain my own version - which will be easier with git, but not as nice as telling people that 3.8 is compatible. (also, paraview 3.8, hdf 1.8 - see how they rhyme. It's almost like they belong together).
>>
>> JB
>>
>>
>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: Berk Geveci [mailto:berk.geveci at kitware.com]
>>> Sent: 18 March 2010 21:02
>>> To: Biddiscombe, John A.
>>> Cc: paraview-developers at paraview.org
>>> Subject: Re: [Paraview-developers] Moving to hdf5-1.8.x
>>>
>>> Ah, I see. I didn't realize that you wanted it in 3.8. That's
>>> Utkarsh's call. Making such a big change  (is it big? I am guessing
>>> so) 1 week before branch is a bit risky. I'd suggest checking it in
>>> after 3.8, let it mature for a few months and have it be official in
>>> 3.10 (or 4.0 whatever it is called).
>>>
>>> -berk
>>>
>>> On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 3:36 PM, Biddiscombe, John A. <biddisco at cscs.ch>
>>> wrote:
>>> > Berk
>>> >
>>> >> I vote for (2). I also vote for waiting until after we branch 3.8 and
>>> >> after we switch to Git (which will follow the 3.8 branch by a week or
>>> >> two). In all, it will probably be around 4 weeks before we switch to
>>> >> Git.
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > As long as I can get it into 3.8 - then I will be happy to wait for git
>>> etc.
>>> >
>>> > JB
>>> >
>> _______________________________________________
>> Paraview-developers mailing list
>> Paraview-developers at paraview.org
>> http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/paraview-developers
>>
>


More information about the Paraview-developers mailing list