[Paraview-developers] Requiring Qt 4.6 for ParaView 3.8

[Marcus D. Hanwell]

Sounds good to me, but I was hoping to clarify what this means. I am
guessing we are switching to focus most testing on Qt 4.6.x, the releases
will be built against Qt 4.6.x, but ParaView 3.8 should still work with Qt
4.5.x too. Is that correct?

Marcus

On Sat, Feb 6, 2010 at 7:41 PM, Dave Partyka <dave.partyka at kitware.com>wrote:

> Sounds good to me. I already have switched a few dashboards over. I'll
> check in the the logic change to warn if Qt 4.5 is found and error if it is
> older.
>
>
> On Sat, Feb 6, 2010 at 6:50 PM, Berk Geveci <berk.geveci at kitware.com>wrote:
>
>> I think that it is a great idea.
>>
>> -berk
>>
>>
>> On Sat, Feb 6, 2010 at 5:32 PM, Utkarsh Ayachit <
>> utkarsh.ayachit at kitware.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Folks,
>>>
>>> As we are approaching 3.8 branch, what does everyone think of making
>>> Qt 4.6 the officially supported version? Quite a few of us have been
>>> using Qt 4.6 for quite some time now and don't think there are any
>>> issues.
>>>
>>> Utkarsh
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Paraview-developers mailing list
>>> Paraview-developers at paraview.org
>>> http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/paraview-developers
>>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Paraview-developers mailing list
>> Paraview-developers at paraview.org
>> http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/paraview-developers
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Paraview-developers mailing list
> Paraview-developers at paraview.org
> http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/paraview-developers
>
>


-- 
Marcus D. Hanwell, Ph.D.
R&D Engineer, Kitware Inc.
(518) 881-4937
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://public.kitware.com/pipermail/paraview-developers/attachments/20100207/c6ce6710/attachment.htm>