[Paraview-developers] Moving to hdf5-1.8.x

[Dave Partyka]

Is there a reason we shouldn't include the c++ bindings? Especially if they
have done all the export work for building shared libraries on Windows? I
have had plugin developers wanting to use the C++ api for hdf5/netcdf is why
I ask.

On Fri, Apr 16, 2010 at 3:11 PM, David Thompson <dcthomp at sandia.gov> wrote:

> After ranting on a bit yesterday, I had another go at the install rules and
>> found that removing all the complicated if stuff I put in makes it simpler
>> and it errr still works. So that's nice.
>>
>> Question.
>>
>> Assuming I go ahead with it ...Do I put the entire hdf distribution under
>> utilites - or just the bits that we need for paraview support? (ie skip most
>> tools/examples/cpp bindings/fortran etc etc).
>>
>
>
> The netcdf included with VTK is just the library and not any of the tools.
> However, I think it's a good idea to provide h5dump (and ncdump for that
> matter) since they are good ways to debug problems. Certainly, I wouldn't
> include C++/FORTRAN bindings or examples.
>
>        Just my 2 cents,
>        David
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Paraview-developers mailing list
> Paraview-developers at paraview.org
> http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/paraview-developers
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://public.kitware.com/pipermail/paraview-developers/attachments/20100416/9aa63fb2/attachment.htm>