[Opengeoscience-developers] [geoweb] Setup dev build so only one list of source files is need (#88)

Aashish Chaudhary aashish.chaudhary at kitware.com
Fri Aug 9 08:18:14 EDT 2013


On Fri, Aug 9, 2013 at 8:05 AM, Chris Harris <chris.harris at kitware.com>wrote:

> Hi Ben,
>
> Nice idea, but looks like you missed adding geoweb.min.js.in ?
>
> Aashish, Was there any reason JS_UGLIFY_FILES and JS_LINT_FILES where
> separate lists?
>

The reason is not valid anymore in some ways. For uglify we have to follow
a strict order but for lint that's not the case.

I agree that since the code is somewhat stable we can just have one.

- Aashish


>
> Chris
>
> On Thu, Aug 8, 2013 at 7:24 PM, benbu <notifications at github.com> wrote:
>
>> Added in branch 88-enhance-run-from-source-config
>>
>> This makes it so you only need to add new files to a single list
>> in the CMakeLists.txt file. The source based geoweb.min.js is now
>> autogenerated using the JS_UGLIFY_FILES list. Additionally,
>> JS_LINT_FILES originates from JS_UGLIFY_FILES now, leaving a single
>> list of source files in CMakeLists.txt
>>
>> @cjh1 <https://github.com/cjh1> can you review this and get it into
>> master?
>>
>>>> Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub<https://github.com/OpenGeoscience/geoweb/issues/88#issuecomment-22365777>
>> .
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Opengeoscience-developers mailing list
> Opengeoscience-developers at public.kitware.com
>
> http://public.kitware.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/opengeoscience-developers
>
>


-- 
| Aashish Chaudhary
| R&D Engineer
| Kitware Inc.
| www.kitware.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://public.kitware.com/pipermail/opengeoscience-developers/attachments/20130809/4e1857b7/attachment.html>


More information about the Opengeoscience-developers mailing list