[Opengeoscience-developers] js-lint branch

[Aashish Chaudhary]

Hi Keval,

before that, I tried the branch and found that it broke the code. Actually
I am thinking that if you and Manas can handle the geo library first (since
hopefully no one is touching that code at this moment). And lets have those
files passed. If we run into some issues with those files then we can look
into it further. I think if we go module by module or files by files, it
will make it easy for us to get it done.

Does it make sense?

Thanks,
Aashish



On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 12:25 AM, Keval Sheth <krs435 at students.poly.edu>wrote:

>  Hello Aashish,
>
>  There are few files in which there were no errors while we reviewed
> using Jslint tool, but still it didn't passed the test and showed as
> 'failed' in dashboard. Could you please let us know what are the
> requirements that specific file should pass the test on dashboard apart
> from removing the errors through Jslint tool.
> Below are few files among them from 'geo' folder:
> 'command.js', 'feature.js', 'latlng.js'
>
>  Regards,
> Keval
>  ------------------------------
> *From:* opengeoscience-developers-bounces at public.kitware.com [
> opengeoscience-developers-bounces at public.kitware.com] on behalf of
> Aashish Chaudhary [aashish.chaudhary at kitware.com]
> *Sent:* Thursday, April 25, 2013 3:47 AM
> *To:* opengeoscience-developers
> *Subject:* [Opengeoscience-developers] js-lint branch
>
>   Manas, Keval,
>
>  What's the current status? Should I go ahead and review it?
>
>  - Aashish
>
>
>  --
> | Aashish Chaudhary
> | R&D Engineer
> | Kitware Inc.
> | www.kitware.com
>



-- 
| Aashish Chaudhary
| R&D Engineer
| Kitware Inc.
| www.kitware.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://public.kitware.com/pipermail/opengeoscience-developers/attachments/20130425/f766fb03/attachment.html>