[ITK-users] itk and const-correctness

[Bradley Lowekamp]

Hello Pol,

I don't think anything has changed on this front [1]. So this is still the case for 2014 and 2015. ITK's style is to be more explicit with conversions than implicit and this is consistent with that philosophy.

Brad

[1] https://github.com/InsightSoftwareConsortium/ITK/commits/master/Modules/Core/Common/include/itkSmartPointer.h

On Mar 28, 2015, at 7:44 PM, Pol Monsó Purtí <lluna.nova at gmail.com> wrote:

> Hello all,
> 
> What is the preferred way to achieve const-correctness in ITK?
> 
> I've stumbled with this 2010 post: http://itk-insight-users.2283740.n2.nabble.com/itk-SmartPointer-problem-making-code-const-correct-td5109890.html
> 
> which suggests using raw pointers as arguments and pass ::Pointer in practice. Like the first function of http://www.itk.org/Wiki/ITK/Examples/Utilities/PassImageToFunction with 
>   myStandardPointer(image);
> 
> Is that still the case in 2014? 
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> Pol
> 
>  
> _____________________________________
> Powered by www.kitware.com
> 
> Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
> http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html
> 
> Kitware offers ITK Training Courses, for more information visit:
> http://www.kitware.com/products/protraining.php
> 
> Please keep messages on-topic and check the ITK FAQ at:
> http://www.itk.org/Wiki/ITK_FAQ
> 
> Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
> http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/insight-users

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://public.kitware.com/pipermail/insight-users/attachments/20150328/4b7203fe/attachment.html>