[Insight-users] SimpleITK Build Issues VS 2008 (x64)
Scott Johnson
Scott.Johnson at neuwave.com
Mon Apr 9 10:32:38 EDT 2012
Hello Dan,
Thanks for putting this up. I have downloaded it and have successfully referenced it from my VS 2008 project. I have also been able to instantiate an itk.simple.Image. I'll let you know if I run into any problems.
My final goal is to integrate both Activiz and SimpleITK into the same application. Has anyone done that to this point? In a quick scan I didn't find any of the glue classes.
Thanks again.
-- Scott
-----Original Message-----
From: Dan Mueller [mailto:dan.muel at gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, April 03, 2012 5:44 PM
To: Scott Johnson
Cc: itk (Insight-users at itk.org)
Subject: Re: [Insight-users] SimpleITK Build Issues VS 2008 (x64)
Hi Scott,
Sorry, been busy and didn't get a chance until now to upload the .NET
2.0 SimpleITK C# binaries. I have sent you a link in a private email.
Please let me know if these binaries work for you. I will work on a patch so that in the future the build machine does this by default.
Cheers, Dan
On 4 April 2012 01:18, Scott Johnson <Scott.Johnson at neuwave.com> wrote:
> At this point I don't have a working copy of SimpleITK. I don't
> believe that Dan has had the opportunity to put up the version he was
> able to build. I won't be able to get to it until next week anyway.
>
>
>
> I appreciate everyone's help.
>
>
>
> -- Scott
>
>
>
> From: Bradley Lowekamp [mailto:blowekamp at mail.nih.gov]
> Sent: Tuesday, April 03, 2012 9:06 AM
> To: Scott Johnson
> Cc: itk (Insight-users at itk.org)
>
>
> Subject: Re: [Insight-users] SimpleITK Build Issues VS 2008 (x64)
>
>
>
> Hello Scott,
>
>
>
> This is most definitely progress! I'll update the FAQ to include this
> very important note about SP1, and recommend installing SP1 over TR1
> feature pack.
>
>
>
> When we have addressed this bug in the repository you will be ready to
> go to compile SimpleITK. Until then I hope you have gotten the version
> compiled with VS10 either from Dan, or compiling yourself. I hope that
> this is enough to get going with SimpleITK until this compilation
> issue is resolved. Please let up know if you need further help.
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Brad
>
>
>
> On Apr 2, 2012, at 4:29 PM, Scott Johnson wrote:
>
>
>
> An update.
>
>
>
> I'm now up to the point where I'm getting the errors called out in the bug.
> i.e. the size of the .lib is too large. I haven't decided if that is
> progress or not.
>
>
>
> I also believe I have solved the issue with VC2008FeaturePack.exe not
> installing. The short answer is that it isn't supposed to.
> Everything in the feature pack is included in SP1 including TR1.
> (http://blogs.msdn.com/b/vcblog/archive/2008/08/11/tr1-fixes-in-vc9-sp
> 1.aspx)
>
>
>
> Thanks
>
>
>
> -- Scott
>
>
>
> From: insight-users-bounces at itk.org
> [mailto:insight-users-bounces at itk.org] On Behalf Of Scott Johnson
> Sent: Monday, April 02, 2012 9:24 AM
> To: Bradley Lowekamp
> Cc: itk (Insight-users at itk.org)
> Subject: Re: [Insight-users] SimpleITK Build Issues VS 2008 (x64)
>
>
>
> Thanks Brad. That got me a lot further. I'm through CMake
> configuration and generation and it's building now. I'll keep you posted on my progress.
>
>
>
> -- Scott
>
>
>
> From: Bradley Lowekamp [mailto:blowekamp at mail.nih.gov]
> Sent: Monday, April 02, 2012 9:01 AM
> To: Scott Johnson
> Cc: Dan Mueller; itk (Insight-users at itk.org)
> Subject: Re: [Insight-users] SimpleITK Build Issues VS 2008 (x64)
>
>
>
> Scott,
>
>
>
> I just checked my 64-bit VS installation and the path is slightly different:
>
>
>
> C:\Program Files (x86)\Microsoft Visual Studio 9.0\VC\include
>
>
>
> I have updated the FAQ with this change.
>
>
>
> Brad
>
>
>
> On Apr 2, 2012, at 9:42 AM, Scott Johnson wrote:
>
>
>
> Hello Bradley,
>
>
>
> Thanks for the pointers.
>
>
>
> I checked the naming of my C:\Program Files\Microsoft Visual Studio
> 9.0\VC\include\stdint.h and it is correct.
>
>
>
> I'm running the "Professional Edition" of Visual Studio 2008 if that
> makes a difference. I am also attempting to build the shared
> libraries but haven't been able to get past CMake. I need to figure
> out why the FeaturePack install is failing. Dan also gave me some
> pointers on how to build the libraries with 2010 and run with 2008.
>
>
>
> Thanks again for your help.
>
>
>
> -- Scott
>
>
>
> From: Bradley Lowekamp [mailto:blowekamp at mail.nih.gov]
> Sent: Saturday, March 31, 2012 1:06 PM
> To: Scott Johnson
> Cc: Dan Mueller; itk (Insight-users at itk.org)
> Subject: Re: [Insight-users] SimpleITK Build Issues VS 2008 (x64)
>
>
>
> Hello Scott,
>
>
>
> Getting stdint.h and TR1 should be the easy part. I unfortunately
> don't have access to VS 2009 until Monday, so I can't double check
> these things for you. I have installed and configured virtual machines
> many times with VS 2008. I never had trouble installing the TR1
> feature pack. The only time I had trouble with stdint, was when the
> web browser added an extensions. So please right-click on the file and
> look at the properties to verify it has the correct name. The
> check_include_file_cxx cmake function performs a try_compile on a cxx
> file to check if the header is found. The compiler should not be
> invoked with additional include paths at this point, so it's just going to looking in the standard system locations.
>
>
>
> The hard part... As Dan pointed to in the fact, we are having problems
> compiling with VS9 handling the size of the intermediate static libraries.
> There are some heroic efforts people have gone to get it work with
> this compiler[1]. Additionally in the experimental developmental
> branch we are trying different ways to break up the libraries to over
> come this limitation. On the other hand, I believe that it should be
> possible to build ITK with shared libraries and SimpelITK with share
> libraries to over come this limit as well. However, afterward you'll
> have to manage of ITK shared libraries along with the SimpleITK
> libraries and the C Sharp managed library. I have not verified this
> shared library approach, but will do so on Monday. However, I don't
> really recommend any of these approach to those who are not extremely motivated.
>
>
>
> So the recommendations I have are:
>
>
>
> 1) Switch so VS10, The freely available express edition should be
> compatible with precompiled C#. This should be the easiest.
>
> 2) Wait a couple weeks to see if the libraries can be refactored, to
> over come the limitations of this compiler.
>
> 3) Figure out how to use VS10 to compile SimpleITK c# for .Net 2.0
>
> 4) Delve into getting it to work on VS9 wither with magic flags, the
> experimental branch, or with build ITK and SimpleITK with shared libraries.
>
>
>
> [1] https://itk.icts.uiowa.edu/jira/browse/SIMPLEITK-216
>
>
>
>
>
> Please let up know if you have further problems or success, and good
> luck,
>
> Bradley Lowekamp
>
>
>
> ========================================================
>
> Bradley Lowekamp
>
> Medical Science and Computing for
>
> Office of High Performance Computing and Communications
>
> National Library of Medicine
>
> blowekamp at mail.nih.gov
>
>
>
> On Mar 31, 2012, at 11:05 AM, Scott Johnson wrote:
>
>
>
>
> Thanks Dan.
>
> Where is cmake looking to find stdint.h?
>
> -- Scott
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Dan Mueller [mailto:dan.muel at gmail.com]
> Sent: Friday, March 30, 2012 6:43 PM
> To: Scott Johnson
> Cc: itk (Insight-users at itk.org)
> Subject: Re: [Insight-users] SimpleITK Build Issues VS 2008 (x64)
>
> Hi Scott,
>
> Yes, I also had discovered this. Sorry for not making this clear in my
> email.
>
> Just to be clear, the options are:
> 1. Change SimpleITK so that VS10 builds do no use .NET 4.0 (meaning
> pre-built SimpleITKCSharpManaged.dll will be usable with VS9). I'm not
> going to be able to address this any time soon.
> 2. Get your VS9 environment to support TR1/C99, then build SimpleITK
> yourself.
> (3. Switch to VS10.)
>
>
>
> If I can past the CMake issues I'll feel more confident that I can get
> it to build.
>
> BTW: The issue you report is not an issue with the CMake build per se,
> but an issue with your compiler -- the CMake build is simply doing
> some checks and has determined that your build environment does not
> meet the requirements for SimpleITK.
>
> Good luck.
>
> Cheers, Dan
>
> On 31 March 2012 09:40, Scott Johnson <Scott.Johnson at neuwave.com> wrote:
>
>
> Hi Again,
>
>
>
> With a little research I have found that Visual Studio 2008 is not
> compatible with .Net Framework 4.0. Therefore the pre-built dlls
> cannot be used under VS 2008.
>
>
>
> Back to trying to build it.
>
>
>
> Thanks
>
>
>
> -- Scott
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
>
> From: insight-users-bounces at itk.org
>
> [mailto:insight-users-bounces at itk.org] On Behalf Of Scott Johnson
>
> Sent: Friday, March 30, 2012 6:00 PM
>
> To: Dan Mueller
>
> Cc: itk (Insight-users at itk.org)
>
> Subject: Re: [Insight-users] SimpleITK Build Issues VS 2008 (x64)
>
>
>
> Thanks for the response Dan.
>
>
>
> I'll try to target .NET 4.0 to see if I can use the prebuilt dlls.
>
>
>
> If I can past the CMake issues I'll feel more confident that I can get
> it to build.
>
>
>
> -- Scott
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
>
> From: Dan Mueller [mailto:dan.muel at gmail.com]
>
> Sent: Friday, March 30, 2012 4:44 PM
>
> To: Scott Johnson
>
> Cc: itk (Insight-users at itk.org); Bradley Lowekamp
>
> Subject: Re: [Insight-users] SimpleITK Build Issues VS 2008 (x64)
>
>
>
> Hi Scott,
>
>
>
> Sorry to hear you are experiencing issues with building the SimpleITK
> C# wrappers.
>
>
>
> I tried to use SimpleITKCSharpManaged.dll from
> SimpleITK-0.4.0-CSharp-Win64-anycpu.zip in a Visual Studio 2008
> project and experienced the same issue you described:
>
> Could not load file or assembly 'SimpleITKCSharpManaged.dll' or one of
> its dependencies. This assembly is built by a runtime newer than the
> currently loaded runtime and cannot be loaded.
>
>
>
> The issue is not that the assembly was built by Visual Study 2010
> (which it
> was) but rather it was built to target the .NET 4.0 runtime.
>
> AFAIK it should be possible to build with Visual Studio 2010 but to
> target the .NET 2.0 runtime for example. That said, I am totally flat
> out at the moment and don't know when I will get a chance to do
> this... So you will probably get faster results if you build yourself.
>
>
>
> The SimpleITK FAQ does say that Visual Studio 9 is currently
>
> problematic
>
>
>
> http://www.itk.org/Wiki/ITK_Release_4/SimpleITK/FAQ#Currently_Problema
>
> tic but looking at the SimpleITK dashboard
>
> http://open.cdash.org/index.php?project=simpleITK
>
> I notice there is one Visual Studio 2008 (aka Visual Studio 9) build
> (an x86 build), so it does seem possible to build SimpleITK with VS9.
>
>
>
> Brad owns this build machine, so I've cc'd him. Hopefully he can
> provide some advice on how to setup VS9 to support TR1/C99.
>
>
>
> Cheers, Dan
>
>
>
> On 31 March 2012 05:34, Scott Johnson <Scott.Johnson at neuwave.com> wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> I've been attempting to use SimpleITK under Windows 7 (x64) and
>
> Visual Studio 2008 and CMake 2.8.5. The goal is to use the C# wrappers.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> First, I downloaded SimpleITK-0.4.0-CSharp-Win64-anycpu.zip and
>
> attempted to add a reference to SimpleITKCSharpManaged.dll to my
>
> solution. VS didn't recognize the dll as being valid. (Now I'm
>
> assuming that the dll was built against VS 2010 and isn't backward
>
> compatible.)
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> I then downloaded the source tree with the intent to build it myself.
>
> (I've tried with both the source package from sourceforge and
>
> checking out the most recent code from GIT.) I have been attempting
>
> to follow the directions
> at http://www.itk.org/Wiki/ITK_Release_4/SimpleITK/FAQ.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> When I first ran CMake I was given an error reading:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> CMake Error at CMakeLists.txt:117 (message):
>
>
>
> SimpleITK requires usage of C99 stdint.
>
>
>
> It may be available as an optional download for your compiler.
>
>
>
> Please see the FAQ for details and to see if your compiler is supported.
>
>
>
> http://www.itk.org/Wiki/ITK_Release_4/SimpleITK/FAQ#Do_I_need_to_down
>
> l
>
> oad_an_optional_package_for_C99.3F
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> I downloaded the Visual C++ 2008 Feature Pack Release via the link on
>
> the web site and attempted to install it. It failed because the
>
> installer said that I didn't have the proper features installed for
>
> the update. I also grabbed the stdint.h file and copied it to the
>
> location called out in the directions. I've searched for a 64 bit
>
> version of this feature pack with no luck. I did find Microsoft
>
> Visual C++ 2008 Feature Pack Redistributable Package (x64) but that
> didn't help.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> CMake continues to give me errors and I've tracked the initial error
>
> to a line in the CMakeLists.txt file which reads:
>
>
>
> check_include_file_cxx( stdint.h SITK_HAS_STDINT_H )
>
>
>
> I've been looking around to find out what paths are searched by
>
> check_include_file_cxx to no avail. But evidently C:\Program
>
> Files\Microsoft Visual Studio 9/0\VC\include isn't one of them.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> If possible I'd like to get this to work under VS 2008 and I'd
>
> appreciate any help I can get. Right now I'm out of ideas as to what
> is going wrong.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Thanks
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> -- Scott
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ========================================================
>
> Bradley Lowekamp
>
> Medical Science and Computing for
>
> Office of High Performance Computing and Communications
>
> National Library of Medicine
>
> blowekamp at mail.nih.gov
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ========================================================
>
> Bradley Lowekamp
>
> Medical Science and Computing for
>
> Office of High Performance Computing and Communications
>
> National Library of Medicine
>
> blowekamp at mail.nih.gov
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> _____________________________________
> Powered by www.kitware.com
>
> Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
> http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html
>
> Kitware offers ITK Training Courses, for more information visit:
> http://www.kitware.com/products/protraining.php
>
> Please keep messages on-topic and check the ITK FAQ at:
> http://www.itk.org/Wiki/ITK_FAQ
>
> Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
> http://www.itk.org/mailman/listinfo/insight-users
>
More information about the Insight-users
mailing list