[Insight-users] wn64 error on itkMeshFileReadWriteTest06

[Alexandre GOUAILLARD]

wanlin, there is no patch attached to your email.

alex.


On Wed, Dec 7, 2011 at 2:20 PM, wanlin <wanlinzhu at gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Xiaoxiao,
>     Thank for pointing out these mistakes. It's weired that i didn't find
> the mistakes in the previous tests. There are two mistakes in the code. I
> made some patches for it. However due to the network constraint, i could not
> conduct tests on my laptop. Could you please help me push them to
> http://review.source.kitware.com/#change,3457
>
>
> thanks and regards
>
>
> wanlin
>
>
> On Wed, Dec 7, 2011 at 7:07 AM, Xiaoxiao Liu <xiaoxiao.liu at kitware.com>
> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Wanlin,
>> Will you please take a look at this win64 error?:
>> http://www.cdash.org/CDash/testDetails.php?test=123324636&build=1794079
>>
>>
>> The baseline mesh file has :
>> 1       8       6      24
>>        1       6
>>  0.00000E+00 0.00000E+00 0.00000E+00
>>  1.00000E+00 0.00000E+00 0.00000E+00
>>  1.00000E+00 2.00000E+00 0.00000E+00
>>  0.00000E+00 2.00000E+00 0.00000E+00
>>  0.00000E+00 0.00000E+00 1.00000E+00
>>  1.00000E+00 0.00000E+00 1.00000E+00
>>  1.00000E+00 2.00000E+00 1.00000E+00
>>  0.00000E+00 2.00000E+00 1.00000E+00
>>        4       3       2      -1
>>        5       6       7      -8
>>        1       5       8      -4
>>        4       8       7      -3
>>        3       7       6      -2
>>        2       6       5      -1
>>
>> and the output file from the win64 machine is :
>>     1       8       6       12
>>        1       6
>>  0.000000e+000 0.000000e+000 0.000000e+000
>>  1.000000e+000 0.000000e+000 0.000000e+000
>>  1.000000e+000 2.000000e+000 0.000000e+000
>>  0.000000e+000 2.000000e+000 0.000000e+000
>>  0.000000e+000 0.000000e+000 1.000000e+000
>>  1.000000e+000 0.000000e+000 1.000000e+000
>>  1.000000e+000 2.000000e+000 1.000000e+000
>>  0.000000e+000 2.000000e+000 1.000000e+000
>>        4       3       2       18446744073709551
>> 615
>>        5       6       7       18446744073709551
>> 608
>>        1       5       8       18446744073709551
>> 612
>>        4       8       7       18446744073709551
>> 613
>>        3       7       6       18446744073709551
>> 614
>>        2       6       5       18446744073709551
>> 615
>>
>>
>> There is something wrong with the four column data. When you sign -1 to a
>> unsigned long number, you will get this large number on win64.
>>
>> Also there are some integer type inconsistencies looks fishy:
>>    http://review.source.kitware.com/#change,3457
>>
>>
>> Thanks!
>> -Xiaoxiao
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------
>> Xiaoxiao Liu, Ph.D.
>> R & D Engineer
>> Kitware Inc.
>> Clifton Park, NY
>> Phone: (518) 881-4924  or  (518) 371-3971 x124
>>
>>
>
>
> _____________________________________
> Powered by www.kitware.com
>
> Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
> http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html
>
> Kitware offers ITK Training Courses, for more information visit:
> http://www.kitware.com/products/protraining.html
>
> Please keep messages on-topic and check the ITK FAQ at:
> http://www.itk.org/Wiki/ITK_FAQ
>
> Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
> http://www.itk.org/mailman/listinfo/insight-users
>