[Insight-users] muliple pahse Chan Vese, one partition totally shrink
Baoyun Li
baoyun_li123 at yahoo.com
Fri Mar 26 10:48:38 EDT 2010
Dear All:
Thanks for your reply, now seems I undertand the question more.
According to Wanlin's paper, I need to encoding the 2 level set to 3 phase if I want to 3 segmenations. If I need 4 segmentation, I need to encode the levelset to 4 phases.
So my origianl question is not correct, once I set 4 phases, no phase will shrink to empty, and I will get 4 segmentation anyway. (Please correct me if I am wrong).
Thanks and my best regards
Baoyun
Please correct me if I am wrong
--- On Thu, 3/25/10, Luis Ibanez <luis.ibanez at kitware.com> wrote:
From: Luis Ibanez <luis.ibanez at kitware.com>
Subject: Re: [Insight-users] muliple pahse Chan Vese, one partition totally shrink
To: "Baoyun Li" <baoyun_li123 at yahoo.com>
Cc: insight-users at itk.org, "Mosaliganti, Kishore Rao" <Kishore_Mosaliganti at hms.harvard.edu>
Date: Thursday, March 25, 2010, 10:43 PM
Hi Baoyun,
You seem to be mixing two different issues here.
One thing is to segment the image in different regions,
and a separate issue is to find an efficient encoding
for the resulting segmentations.
If you want to segment three different anatomical structures
from your image, then you want to use a level set with
three phases.
That is, one phase per object to be segmented.
Regards,
Luis
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 5:52 PM, Baoyun Li <baoyun_li123 at yahoo.com> wrote:
Dear All:
I have a theoritical question about Chen Vese multiplse pahse leve set.
I have two level set and the two level set can segment the image to 4 segments, then I can calculate the mean for each segments as following
%c11 = mean (phi1>0 & phi2>0)
%c12 = mean (phi1>0 & phi2<0)
%c21 = mean (phi1<0 & phi2>0)
%c22 = mean (phi1<0 & phi2<0)
How about if I only have three segments, let say segment (phi1<0 & phi2<0) will finally shrink to zeros.
Then how to I calcuate c22, and also what value of c22 I should use to update leve set equation as shown below:
((u-c22)^2-(u-c12)^2)H(phi2).
I saw somebody use the mininum number of the machine to replace c22, but I could not imagine what will happen and why to do that.
Thanks
Baoyun
_____________________________________
Powered by www.kitware.com
Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html
Kitware offers ITK Training Courses, for more information visit:
http://www.kitware.com/products/protraining.html
Please keep messages on-topic and check the ITK FAQ at:
http://www.itk.org/Wiki/ITK_FAQ
Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
http://www.itk.org/mailman/listinfo/insight-users
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.itk.org/pipermail/insight-users/attachments/20100326/bc8cdda6/attachment-0001.htm>
More information about the Insight-users
mailing list