[Insight-users] [Insight-developers] Tcon Agenda Posted (Tuesday 1pm EST)

Tue Aug 10 12:52:18 EDT 2010

Yes, 
	I believe the schedule needs a revisions and update, as A-01, A-02, A-03 seem to be blurring together. I suppose, I expected some tags, there to branch new work off at each phase.

Brad

On Aug 10, 2010, at 12:42 PM, Alexandre GOUAILLARD wrote:

> hi luis,
> 
> I see an inconsistency in the planning.
> 
> the drawing of the versions of v4 states the release of itk v4
> including gdcm 2.0 and jpeg2000 for august 21st. However, in the dicom
> section, you wrote saturday 14th?
> 
> I haven't asked mathieu yet, but I'm pretty sure he was aiming for
> 21st and 14th would be unrealistic.
> 
> alex.
> 
> 
> On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 6:33 PM, Luis Ibanez <luis.ibanez at kitware.com> wrote:
>> 
>> Alex,
>> 
>> Good point.
>> 
>> The consensus is to schedule an independent
>> tcon for talking about ITKv4 & Microscopy.
>> 
>> 
>> I just rearranged the agenda according to
>> your suggestions:
>> 
>> 
>> 3 Technical Topics
>> 
>> 3.1 Stable ITK 3.20
>> 3.2 DICOM
>> 3.3 Simple ITK
>> 3.4 Wrapping
>> 3.5 Refactoring Optimization Framework
>> 3.6 Modularization
>> 3.7 Microscopy
>> 
>> The immediate activity to tackle is DICOM and
>> the update to GDCM 2.0, that includes the upgrade
>> of openjpeg to "v2".
>> 
>> In the same pass we will introduce the JPEG2000Image
>> that Kishore just posted to the Insight Journal.
>> 
>> The plan is to cut that release by the end of this week.
>> 
>> Does this address your concerns ?
>> 
>> 
>>     Luis
>> 
>> 
>> ---------------------------------------
>> On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 12:13 PM, Alexandre GOUAILLARD
>> <agouaillard at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> 
>>> hi all,
>>> 
>>> I really think the questions raised by the microscopy community are
>>> great and should be addressed. I would be very happy to participate to
>>> the discussion and maybe bring in some ideas. There are tough
>>> questions though, that have been presented numerous time to the
>>> community already without a clear answer so far. They deserve the
>>> right amount of time for people to think about it. Also, I do not
>>> think that any core itk-v4 contract was awarded for that, correct?
>>> 
>>> Unfortunately, we are on a very tight schedule for v4 core, and some
>>> core questions (simple itk, wrapping, dicom, ....) haven't been
>>> discussed about for almost three weeks now. I am wondering (out loud)
>>> if this is the right time and place fr this discussion.
>>> 
>>> We should have sent the draft for T.O.2 one week ago already, and I m
>>> concerned that we wouldn't be able to converge on those three (and
>>> more) points this week again if we started with microscopy. I know
>>> this is a concern for many people as bill, luis and other suggested
>>> that the agenda be reversed for that exact same reason. I suggest we
>>> had microscopy to the agenda, not to forget about it, but lower than
>>> the itk-v4 core points, especially those that haven't been adressed
>>> for three weeks.
>>> 
>>> regards.
>>> 
>>> alex.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> On Mon, Aug 9, 2010 at 9:45 PM, Luis Ibanez <luis.ibanez at kitware.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> Brad, Arnaud,
>>>> 
>>>> Yes, let's do that then.
>>>> 
>>>> 1) Quick summary on tomorrow's tcon, and
>>>> 
>>>> 2) Schedule a separate tcon to focus on Microscopy.
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> --
>>>> 
>>>> For (2):
>>>> How about Wednesday or Thursday afternoon  ?
>>>> 
>>>> (or we could pick a time tomorrow during the tcon).
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>>     Luis
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> On Mon, Aug 9, 2010 at 3:16 PM, Arnaud GELAS
>>>> <arnaud_gelas at hms.harvard.edu>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>> Hi Brad,
>>>>> 
>>>>> I think we should do both, first to present problems from the
>>>>> microscopy
>>>>> community. At least everyone can understand some of the related
>>>>> problems in
>>>>> terms of design. Then interested people and people that have ideas on
>>>>> how to
>>>>> address these issues can then meet in another break out t-con.
>>>>> 
>>>>> It seems to be important to discuss at least in the main t-conf:
>>>>> 
>>>>> how to deal with time?
>>>>> how to deal with channels? (Note that for one channel, the pixel type
>>>>> could be a scalar, vector or tensor)...
>>>>> 
>>>>> Then we could discuss other details in the break out one...
>>>>> 
>>>>> Arnaud
>>>>> 
>>>>> On 08/09/2010 03:06 PM, Bradley Lowekamp wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>> Hello Luis,
>>>>> Looking over the agenda for tomorrow, I can't help but think  that the
>>>>> Microscopy should be a break out t-con (unless I missed it, and this is
>>>>> a
>>>>> summary). I have had experience with streaming and many related issues
>>>>> to
>>>>> the large datasets complications, so I would like to participate in
>>>>> such a
>>>>> break out.
>>>>> Perhaps the agenda item should just be to schedule such a meeting?
>>>>> Brad
>>>>> On Aug 9, 2010, at 2:35 PM, Luis Ibanez wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>> The Agenda for tomorrow's tcon has been posted at:
>>>>> 
>>>>> http://www.itk.org/Wiki/Agenda%26Status_081010
>>>>> 
>>>>> As discussed in the last tcon,
>>>>> we are inverting the order of the agenda,
>>>>> in order to address some topics for which
>>>>> we have run out of time in previous calls.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Please feel free to add any topics of your interest.
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>>     Luis
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> <ATT00001..txt>
>>>>> 
>>>>> ========================================================
>>>>> 
>>>>> Bradley Lowekamp
>>>>> 
>>>>> Lockheed Martin Contractor for
>>>>> 
>>>>> Office of High Performance Computing and Communications
>>>>> 
>>>>> National Library of Medicine
>>>>> 
>>>>> blowekamp at mail.nih.gov
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Powered by www.kitware.com
>>>> 
>>>> Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
>>>> http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html
>>>> 
>>>> Kitware offers ITK Training Courses, for more information visit:
>>>> http://kitware.com/products/protraining.html
>>>> 
>>>> Please keep messages on-topic and check the ITK FAQ at:
>>>> http://www.itk.org/Wiki/ITK_FAQ
>>>> 
>>>> Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
>>>> http://www.itk.org/mailman/listinfo/insight-developers
>>>> 
>>>> 
>> 
>> 
> _______________________________________________
> Powered by www.kitware.com
> 
> Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
> http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html
> 
> Kitware offers ITK Training Courses, for more information visit:
> http://kitware.com/products/protraining.html
> 
> Please keep messages on-topic and check the ITK FAQ at:
> http://www.itk.org/Wiki/ITK_FAQ
> 
> Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
> http://www.itk.org/mailman/listinfo/insight-developers

========================================================
Bradley Lowekamp  
Lockheed Martin Contractor for
Office of High Performance Computing and Communications
National Library of Medicine 
blowekamp at mail.nih.gov

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.itk.org/pipermail/insight-users/attachments/20100810/45f8cafb/attachment-0001.htm>