[Insight-users] Using ITK with visual studio and not cmake

[Xiaofeng Z]

 	<3e0f01010910190956i1b56f320i44b7368a0a0d1790 at mail.gmail.com>
 

 <B2DF102D-8C55-45B1-9E46-1156D7D78127 at bluequartz.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0




>> Let me put it this way: the CMake paradigm adopted by itk=2C that of
>> single files to accomplish a simple task=2C is fine for little command
>> line applications=2C but not how I want to build an application. If I
>> wanted to incorporate other libraries (ie=2C QT for useful interfaces=2C
>> etc)=2C trying to mesh these libraries with those will be most likely
>> excruciating. That's why I'm looking for a simple build location=2C
>> with dlls=2C libs=2C and headers=2C not to incorporate with an entire co=
ding
>> paradigm.
=20
Much kudos to you for saying it!
=20
=20

>
> ITK uses the style of includes as "#include "itkImage.h" with out any
> indication of what subfolder itkImage.h resides in. This means that
> _every_ subfolder in the ITK installation/source needs to be
> "included" in the compile command. This looks something like the
> following (on OS X).
>

IMHO=2C this encourages bad programming habits.
=20
  		 	   		 =20
_________________________________________________________________
Your E-mail and More On-the-Go. Get Windows Live Hotmail Free.
http://clk.atdmt.com/GBL/go/171222985/direct/01/=