[Insight-users] Huge performance of time delay on BinaryDilateImageFilter

[Gaëtan Lehmann]

Hi Alireza,

Because of the algorithm used in those filters, it is possible to  
have a different execution time. However, the difference are  
generally small.
Can you give more detail about what you call "quick" and "very long  
time"?

Thanks,

Gaëtan


Le 3 mai 07 à 16:03, Alireza Salamy a écrit :

> Hi all users,
> I am trying to do dilatation by BinaryDilateImageFilterTest on the  
> image which is the output of the BinaryErodeImageFilterTest.the  
> first filter( BinaryErodeImageFilterTest) works very quick but when  
> I try to implement the second filter(BinaryDilateImageFilterTest)  
> it takes very long time.in both filter I chose the radius=5.can  
> somebody let me know what is wrong with that?
>
> Ahhh...imagining that irresistible "new car" smell?
> Check out new cars at Yahoo! Autos.
> _______________________________________________
> Insight-users mailing list
> Insight-users at itk.org
> http://www.itk.org/mailman/listinfo/insight-users

--
Gaëtan Lehmann
Biologie du Développement et de la Reproduction
INRA de Jouy-en-Josas (France)
tel: +33 1 34 65 29 66    fax: 01 34 65 29 09
http://voxel.jouy.inra.fr



-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: PGP.sig
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 186 bytes
Desc: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Ceci_est_une_signature_=E9lectronique_PGP?=
Url : http://public.kitware.com/pipermail/insight-users/attachments/20070504/f70ff5a9/PGP-0001.pgp