[Insight-users] Where is the transformed image gone?

[Luis Ibanez]

Hi Urlek,

As far as I know,
transforming the corners seems to be the best option for
figuring out the extent of the transformed image.



   Regards,


       Luis


--------------
Urlek wrote:
> Is it possible to find out how the volume defined by the boundaries of the
> input 3D image get transformed by geometric transformation. 
> 
> For example, I would like to rotate a 3D image and save to a file exactly
> the smallest region that contains all input pixels. I guess there must be a
> better way than to manually calculate how the transformation moves the image
> corners?