[Insight-users] GDCM + ITK dicom anonymization

[Jeffrey Prescott]

Hello,

  I have written a DICOM anonymizer that closely follows the example given
in "Changin a DICOM Header" section in the ITK software guide.  The program
runs fine, changing tags that I request to be changed.  However, the program
also removes tags that are not specified to be removed anywhere in my
program - e.g., 0020,1041  Slice Location.  I have checked the dicomV3
dictionary that the gdcm library uses, and there doesn't seem to be a
problem with missing fields there.  Is there some hidden functionality when
using the gdcm library to read/write DICOM headers that I'm not aware of?
Thanks!

         jeff
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://public.kitware.com/pipermail/insight-users/attachments/20070212/bef1e67b/attachment.htm