[Insight-users] Re: ITK Wrappers and gcc_xml

[Brad King]

Charl P. Botha wrote:
> On 2/16/06, Brad King <brad.king at kitware.com> wrote:
>>Nice, thanks for tracking that down.  FYI, the trailing underscores show
>>up because __stdcall is not known to GCC so the preprocessor transforms
>>it to __attribute__((__stdcall__)) or something like that which is the
>>attribute that tells GCC to use the __stdcall calling convention (on
>>MinGW for example).
> 
> Does this mean that you'll be able to adapt CableSwig so that it'll be
> able to handle this situation without human intervention? (i.e.
> hand-editing CableSwig generated C++ :)

I'm just saying it's technically possible but I have no time to do it 
myself.  Out of curiosity why are you trying to wrap such a low-level 
interface?

-Brad