[Insight-users] WrapITK python bindings and GradientAnisotropicDiffusion with 3D float input

[Zachary Pincus]

> We are in the way of breaking the current modules (ITKCommonA,  
> ITKCommonA, ITKBasicFiltersA, ...) in more modules which will group  
> classes in a better way. The user will be able to build only the  
> relevent subpart of WrapITK for his need. He will be able to load  
> only a consistent subpart, etc.
> Given the early stage of development, I don't think we will keep  
> the old modules content, so we will break your code here, and so I  
> would not recommend you to use the submodules :-/
> Zach, what do you think of this backward compatibility problem ?

Hmm. I think that at least for now (WrapITK is just an InsightJournal  
article) we can't worry too much about backward compatibility on this  
point. Getting the needed functionality is more important.

We *could* make the sub-modules strictly follow the current  
hierarchy, so that ITKBasicFiltersA will just import all of the sub- 
modules that it contains. This would solve the backwards  
compatibility issue, but at the expense of having less-good groupings  
of filters into various modules. (E.g. morphological filters aren't  
all in BasicFiltersA or B or C.) I think we should work on separating  
the modules out, and for the time being accept some slight code  
breakage.

Any thoughts?

Zach



> Using a recent version of swig should also help us a lot to  
> decrease loading time, but it requires some work we don't have time  
> to do know
>
> Gaetan
>
>
> -- 
> Gaëtan Lehmann
> Biologie du Développement et de la Reproduction
> INRA de Jouy-en-Josas (France)
> tel: +33 1 34 65 29 66    fax: 01 34 65 29 09
> http://voxel.jouy.inra.fr
> _______________________________________________
> Insight-users mailing list
> Insight-users at itk.org
> http://www.itk.org/mailman/listinfo/insight-users