[Insight-users] Re: itkLevelSetNodeF3 in itk 2.0?

[Gaetan Lehmann]

I was writting this mail, and I though "Charl P. Botha", I know this  
name...

I fact, I have your name under my eyes in itk.swg and in ConnectVTKITK  
files :-)
I'm trying to connect itk and vtk by mixing ConnectVTKITK, ITK wrapping  
system and classes in InsightApplication/Auxiliary/vtk.

Many thanks for your work :-)

Gaetan

On Fri, 10 Jun 2005 10:08:26 +0200, Gaetan Lehmann  
<gaetan.lehmann at jouy.inra.fr> wrote:

>
> Hi Charl,
>
> Sadly, ITK developers doesn't seems really interested in this work...  
> but they are really busy, and they have already done a really good work  
> (for both ITK and ITK wrappers).
> Wrapper just need a small improvement to be really usable... That's what  
> I'm trying to do :-)
>
> I'm not working only on avaible types.
> I have made a itk module for python which bring some facilities for itk  
> python user ( http://www.itk.org/Bug/bug.php?op=show&bugid=1766 ). I  
> hope it will be added in ITK soon :-)
> I'm currently working on itk-vtk connection, to be able to connect ITK  
> and VTK with only one object :-)
>
> It's lots of work, and as said before, each help is welcome !
>
> Gaetan.
>
> On Fri, 03 Jun 2005 18:16:25 +0200, Charl P. Botha <cpbotha at gmail.com>  
> wrote:
>
>> Hi there Gaetan,
>>
>> On 6/3/05, Gaetan Lehmann <gaetan.lehmann at jouy.inra.fr> wrote:
>>> I'm trying to have a more consistent set of classes avaible in python.
>>> Because of the size of the executable, it's impossible to wrap each  
>>> type
>>> for each class, so  to be able to increase number of avaible classes, I
>>> reduce avaible types to unsigned short and and float for image  
>>> dimension 2
>>> and 3 (US2, US3, F2, F3) and some other types for particular filters  
>>> such
>>> as ImageFileWriter where UC2 and UC3 are also avaible.
>>> I now have losts more filters with only a small increase a executable  
>>> size.
>>
>> Wow, this sounds great!  I did something similar by extracting only
>> the wrapping system from ITK, but it was too much effort keeping up
>> with ITK CVS.
>>
>> I wonder how others feel about the idea of doing this in ITK itself.
>> I think that by wrapping only US2,3 and F2,3 of a wider selection of
>> filters, as you have done, one makes a far larger user group happy.
>>
>> Kitware ladies and gentlemen, what do you think?
>>
>
>
>



-- 
Gaetan Lehmann <gaetan.lehmann at jouy.inra.fr>
Tel: +33 1 34 65 29 66
Biologie du Développement et de la Reproduction
INRA de Jouy-en-Josas (France)
Web: http://voxel.jouy.inra.fr