[ITK-dev] Possible to build ITK libs without version number in filename?

[Dženan Zukić]

Hi Sean,

version numbers shouldn't be an issue if you configure your project using
CMake (which automatically takes care of all library paths). I forgot how
much of a pain in the ass it is to set those paths without CMake -
something one project reminded me of this week.

HTH,
Dženan

On Fri, Feb 5, 2016 at 3:12 PM, Sean McBride <sean at rogue-research.com>
wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> Is it possible to build ITK such that the resulting library names do not
> have version numbers in them?  ie instead of "libITKCommon-4.9.a" could it
> be just "libITKCommon.a"?
>
> VTK has a build option VTK_CUSTOM_LIBRARY_SUFFIX that you can set to an
> empty string to get this.  Does ITK have something analogous?
>
> (The version numbers are annoying for me because my Xcode projects
> reference the ITK libs by filename, and every time the version is bumped
> it's a pain to switch back and forth.)
>
> Thanks,
>
> --
> ____________________________________________________________
> Sean McBride, B. Eng                 sean at rogue-research.com
> Rogue Research                        www.rogue-research.com
> Mac Software Developer              Montréal, Québec, Canada
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Powered by www.kitware.com
>
> Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
> http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html
>
> Kitware offers ITK Training Courses, for more information visit:
> http://kitware.com/products/protraining.php
>
> Please keep messages on-topic and check the ITK FAQ at:
> http://www.itk.org/Wiki/ITK_FAQ
>
> Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
> http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/insight-developers
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://public.kitware.com/pipermail/insight-developers/attachments/20160206/dc8a99c9/attachment.html>