From zack.galbreath at kitware.com  Fri Apr  1 15:14:06 2016
From: zack.galbreath at kitware.com (Zack Galbreath)
Date: Fri, 1 Apr 2016 15:14:06 -0400
Subject: [ITK-dev] open.cdash.org upgrade
Message-ID: <CANgkMA46U2U216ivwaeP5_araEfiFu-YkYdeVVuAbJdm+AM9Sw@mail.gmail.com>

I plan to upgrade open.cdash.org this coming Monday, April 4th, at 5pm
EDT.  I expect the site to be unavailable for an hour or so while I perform
this upgrade.  During this time CDash will not accept any incoming
submissions.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://public.kitware.com/pipermail/insight-developers/attachments/20160401/9b7fdbac/attachment.html>

From matt.mccormick at kitware.com  Sat Apr  2 12:18:13 2016
From: matt.mccormick at kitware.com (Matt McCormick)
Date: Sat, 2 Apr 2016 12:18:13 -0400
Subject: [ITK-dev] [ITK] Community versus Users Lists
In-Reply-To: <CALzTN-Q0VJnD0MGN0q0grZYce7=2exTBMvC2RtHpftOMLTQDSg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <5B958451-72D1-4039-A67C-77A8B9ADD558@kcl.ac.uk>
 <CALzTN-T+jiOHhyUM+q8RPkGe8Niztv=bs07vx-mKUUHak+GRQQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <54FB17C1-10F7-404C-85CA-FD0F77F2E630@gmail.com>
 <DM2PR07MB350D62263920E2F35B542CFD8850@DM2PR07MB350.namprd07.prod.outlook.com>
 <CALzTN-Qj8e+gkfPPkxiA_D34=zbCQsfNWR=2Fi+K=5HimzM5MA@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAPf2UMTCcf663zhZhc4YxK4bR8KHxRe-kw46ZpEJdyoqy=dsCA@mail.gmail.com>
 <CALzTN-Q0VJnD0MGN0q0grZYce7=2exTBMvC2RtHpftOMLTQDSg@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CALzTN-TsuMp+ukHR_wqFRkB1TmDsbMF_8wgXNOBEoVTAF-Tg6A@mail.gmail.com>

Here is a draft of the poll:


https://docs.google.com/forms/d/19BL8Gbb3Z0qdekys2i6keHPZSdkSOgbRg84mWOhEu8U/viewform

Are there any suggestions on the wording? Missing options?

Thanks,
Matt

On Tue, Mar 29, 2016 at 12:16 PM, Matt McCormick <matt.mccormick at kitware.com
> wrote:

> Doodle polls are usually for scheduling times only (as far as I am
> aware).  Perhaps a Google Form?
>
> M
>
> On Tue, Mar 29, 2016 at 11:10 AM, D?enan Zuki? <dzenanz at gmail.com> wrote:
> > Hi everyone,
> >
> > since ITK is now in a mature phase, there is not a lot of traffic on
> > ITK-Developers. I suppose the best would be to completely transition to
> just
> > one list (community) which was created for that purpose. This would
> simplify
> > things.
> >
> > But having a poll sounds like a good idea. Did you mean something like a
> > Doodle poll, or somehow restrict the poll to just the members of the 3
> > mailing lists?
> >
> > Regards,
> > D?enan
> >
> > On Sat, Mar 26, 2016 at 11:22 PM, Matt McCormick
> > <matt.mccormick at kitware.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> The current situation is not optimal, and it is difficult to keep all
> >> parties involved happy.
> >>
> >> - Some people do not want to be bothered to subscribe to more than one
> >> list, be it community, insight-users, or insight-developers.
> >> - Some people on insight-developers do not want to be auto-subscribed
> >> to a different list that has a different amount of traffic.
> >> - There are a number of non-mailman interfaces to the mailing lists
> >> that may not adapt to changes (Nabble, GMane, etc.), and some people
> >> use these interfaces exclusively.
> >>
> >> Any change will result in some unhappy campers, but some change may
> >> still be necessary to improve the status quo.
> >>
> >> Perhaps we should create a poll distributed to all lists to select a
> >> way forward? Other constructive ideas?
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >> Matt
> >>
> >> On Sat, Mar 26, 2016 at 10:01 PM, Andras Lasso <lasso at queensu.ca>
> wrote:
> >> > I completely agree. Either a single community list or pair of
> >> > devel&users
> >> > makes sense.
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > My personal experience: I've signed up to the community list when it
> was
> >> > created and unsubscribed from users. However, it was quite annoying
> that
> >> > I
> >> > received emails from users list but my responses were bounced. So, I
> had
> >> > to
> >> > sign up again to the users list. I still don?t know where to send new
> >> > posts:
> >> > users or community.
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > Andras
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > From: Michka Popoff
> >> > Sent: March 26, 2016 14:24
> >> > To: Matt McCormick
> >> > Cc: community at itk.org
> >> > Subject: Re: [ITK] Community versus Users Lists
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > Hi
> >> >
> >> > one thought about this. If I remember well, (but I may be mistaken),
> >> > the community at itk.org address was introduced to replace the two
> others.
> >> >
> >> > Now, we have to follow 3 different mailing lists. The mail traffic is
> >> > okay
> >> > for me on
> >> > these 3 lists, so having only one would be great.
> >> > It would help people to know which one to use.
> >> >
> >> > Or we should go back to the old behaviour, with a user/developer list.
> >> > But I think developers want also to know what they users are doing,
> >> > so they are often registered on the two (/three) anyway.
> >> >
> >> > Michka
> >> >
> >> >> On 17 Mar 2016, at 16:42, Matt McCormick <matt.mccormick at kitware.com
> >
> >> >> wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >> Hi Toby,
> >> >>
> >> >> To post to the insight-users or insight-developers list, your email
> >> >> account currently needs to be subscribed there, too.
> >> >>
> >> >> Matt
> >> >>
> >> >> On Thu, Mar 17, 2016 at 5:47 AM, Wood, Tobias <tobias.wood at kcl.ac.uk
> >
> >> >> wrote:
> >> >>> Hello,
> >> >>>
> >> >>> Apologies for a newbie question but this has been bugging me for a
> >> >>> while.
> >> >>> I am subscribed to the community at itk.org mailing list. As noted on
> the
> >> >>> sign-up page, this also receives all the mail from insight-users
> (and
> >> >>> insight-developers). When I try to reply to a message from one of
> >> >>> these
> >> >>> lists in my mail client, the reply-to address is set to
> insight-users.
> >> >>> If I
> >> >>> send the message as is, I get a failure message telling me I am not
> >> >>> subscribed to the mailing list (which is correct).
> >> >>>
> >> >>>
> >> >>> How should I be responding to such e-mail threads? Will a reply to
> >> >>> community at itk.org forward the message on to insight-users? Or
> should I
> >> >>> be
> >> >>> subscribing to all 3 mailing lists (seems suboptimal as I assume I
> >> >>> will get
> >> >>> multiple copies of messages).
> >> >>>
> >> >>> Thanks,
> >> >>> Toby
> >> >>> _______________________________________________
> >> >>> Community mailing list
> >> >>> Community at itk.org
> >> >>> http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/community
> >> >> _______________________________________________
> >> >> Community mailing list
> >> >> Community at itk.org
> >> >> http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/community
> >> >
> >> > _______________________________________________
> >> > Community mailing list
> >> > Community at itk.org
> >> > http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/community
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Community mailing list
> >> Community at itk.org
> >> http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/community
> >
> >
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://public.kitware.com/pipermail/insight-developers/attachments/20160402/8d2189b3/attachment.html>

From dzenanz at gmail.com  Sat Apr  2 13:34:01 2016
From: dzenanz at gmail.com (=?UTF-8?B?RMW+ZW5hbiBadWtpxIc=?=)
Date: Sat, 2 Apr 2016 13:34:01 -0400
Subject: [ITK-dev] [ITK] Community versus Users Lists
In-Reply-To: <CALzTN-TsuMp+ukHR_wqFRkB1TmDsbMF_8wgXNOBEoVTAF-Tg6A@mail.gmail.com>
References: <5B958451-72D1-4039-A67C-77A8B9ADD558@kcl.ac.uk>
 <CALzTN-T+jiOHhyUM+q8RPkGe8Niztv=bs07vx-mKUUHak+GRQQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <54FB17C1-10F7-404C-85CA-FD0F77F2E630@gmail.com>
 <DM2PR07MB350D62263920E2F35B542CFD8850@DM2PR07MB350.namprd07.prod.outlook.com>
 <CALzTN-Qj8e+gkfPPkxiA_D34=zbCQsfNWR=2Fi+K=5HimzM5MA@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAPf2UMTCcf663zhZhc4YxK4bR8KHxRe-kw46ZpEJdyoqy=dsCA@mail.gmail.com>
 <CALzTN-Q0VJnD0MGN0q0grZYce7=2exTBMvC2RtHpftOMLTQDSg@mail.gmail.com>
 <CALzTN-TsuMp+ukHR_wqFRkB1TmDsbMF_8wgXNOBEoVTAF-Tg6A@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CAPf2UMQU+o46xMePUU5MGc73KaspRKswt360kOmSCMGr5NLVdA@mail.gmail.com>

Third option from bottom has a semantic error in it: *"community" and
"insight-developers" should be made read-only, and all members will need to
manually subscribe to "community"* (should be *insight-users*).

The rest looks good.

Regards

On Sat, Apr 2, 2016 at 12:18 PM, Matt McCormick <matt.mccormick at kitware.com>
wrote:

> Here is a draft of the poll:
>
>
> https://docs.google.com/forms/d/19BL8Gbb3Z0qdekys2i6keHPZSdkSOgbRg84mWOhEu8U/viewform
>
> Are there any suggestions on the wording? Missing options?
>
> Thanks,
> Matt
>
> On Tue, Mar 29, 2016 at 12:16 PM, Matt McCormick <
> matt.mccormick at kitware.com> wrote:
>
>> Doodle polls are usually for scheduling times only (as far as I am
>> aware).  Perhaps a Google Form?
>>
>> M
>>
>> On Tue, Mar 29, 2016 at 11:10 AM, D?enan Zuki? <dzenanz at gmail.com> wrote:
>> > Hi everyone,
>> >
>> > since ITK is now in a mature phase, there is not a lot of traffic on
>> > ITK-Developers. I suppose the best would be to completely transition to
>> just
>> > one list (community) which was created for that purpose. This would
>> simplify
>> > things.
>> >
>> > But having a poll sounds like a good idea. Did you mean something like a
>> > Doodle poll, or somehow restrict the poll to just the members of the 3
>> > mailing lists?
>> >
>> > Regards,
>> > D?enan
>> >
>> > On Sat, Mar 26, 2016 at 11:22 PM, Matt McCormick
>> > <matt.mccormick at kitware.com> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> Hi,
>> >>
>> >> The current situation is not optimal, and it is difficult to keep all
>> >> parties involved happy.
>> >>
>> >> - Some people do not want to be bothered to subscribe to more than one
>> >> list, be it community, insight-users, or insight-developers.
>> >> - Some people on insight-developers do not want to be auto-subscribed
>> >> to a different list that has a different amount of traffic.
>> >> - There are a number of non-mailman interfaces to the mailing lists
>> >> that may not adapt to changes (Nabble, GMane, etc.), and some people
>> >> use these interfaces exclusively.
>> >>
>> >> Any change will result in some unhappy campers, but some change may
>> >> still be necessary to improve the status quo.
>> >>
>> >> Perhaps we should create a poll distributed to all lists to select a
>> >> way forward? Other constructive ideas?
>> >>
>> >> Thanks,
>> >> Matt
>> >>
>> >> On Sat, Mar 26, 2016 at 10:01 PM, Andras Lasso <lasso at queensu.ca>
>> wrote:
>> >> > I completely agree. Either a single community list or pair of
>> >> > devel&users
>> >> > makes sense.
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > My personal experience: I've signed up to the community list when it
>> was
>> >> > created and unsubscribed from users. However, it was quite annoying
>> that
>> >> > I
>> >> > received emails from users list but my responses were bounced. So, I
>> had
>> >> > to
>> >> > sign up again to the users list. I still don?t know where to send new
>> >> > posts:
>> >> > users or community.
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > Andras
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > From: Michka Popoff
>> >> > Sent: March 26, 2016 14:24
>> >> > To: Matt McCormick
>> >> > Cc: community at itk.org
>> >> > Subject: Re: [ITK] Community versus Users Lists
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > Hi
>> >> >
>> >> > one thought about this. If I remember well, (but I may be mistaken),
>> >> > the community at itk.org address was introduced to replace the two
>> others.
>> >> >
>> >> > Now, we have to follow 3 different mailing lists. The mail traffic is
>> >> > okay
>> >> > for me on
>> >> > these 3 lists, so having only one would be great.
>> >> > It would help people to know which one to use.
>> >> >
>> >> > Or we should go back to the old behaviour, with a user/developer
>> list.
>> >> > But I think developers want also to know what they users are doing,
>> >> > so they are often registered on the two (/three) anyway.
>> >> >
>> >> > Michka
>> >> >
>> >> >> On 17 Mar 2016, at 16:42, Matt McCormick <
>> matt.mccormick at kitware.com>
>> >> >> wrote:
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Hi Toby,
>> >> >>
>> >> >> To post to the insight-users or insight-developers list, your email
>> >> >> account currently needs to be subscribed there, too.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Matt
>> >> >>
>> >> >> On Thu, Mar 17, 2016 at 5:47 AM, Wood, Tobias <
>> tobias.wood at kcl.ac.uk>
>> >> >> wrote:
>> >> >>> Hello,
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>> Apologies for a newbie question but this has been bugging me for a
>> >> >>> while.
>> >> >>> I am subscribed to the community at itk.org mailing list. As noted
>> on the
>> >> >>> sign-up page, this also receives all the mail from insight-users
>> (and
>> >> >>> insight-developers). When I try to reply to a message from one of
>> >> >>> these
>> >> >>> lists in my mail client, the reply-to address is set to
>> insight-users.
>> >> >>> If I
>> >> >>> send the message as is, I get a failure message telling me I am not
>> >> >>> subscribed to the mailing list (which is correct).
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>> How should I be responding to such e-mail threads? Will a reply to
>> >> >>> community at itk.org forward the message on to insight-users? Or
>> should I
>> >> >>> be
>> >> >>> subscribing to all 3 mailing lists (seems suboptimal as I assume I
>> >> >>> will get
>> >> >>> multiple copies of messages).
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>> Thanks,
>> >> >>> Toby
>> >> >>> _______________________________________________
>> >> >>> Community mailing list
>> >> >>> Community at itk.org
>> >> >>> http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/community
>> >> >> _______________________________________________
>> >> >> Community mailing list
>> >> >> Community at itk.org
>> >> >> http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/community
>> >> >
>> >> > _______________________________________________
>> >> > Community mailing list
>> >> > Community at itk.org
>> >> > http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/community
>> >> _______________________________________________
>> >> Community mailing list
>> >> Community at itk.org
>> >> http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/community
>> >
>> >
>>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://public.kitware.com/pipermail/insight-developers/attachments/20160402/913fe058/attachment.html>

From bill.lorensen at gmail.com  Sat Apr  2 14:00:41 2016
From: bill.lorensen at gmail.com (Bill Lorensen)
Date: Sat, 2 Apr 2016 11:00:41 -0700
Subject: [ITK-dev] [ITK] Community versus Users Lists
In-Reply-To: <DM2PR07MB3502E7C9FFA7C4EF91C9A0CD89B0@DM2PR07MB350.namprd07.prod.outlook.com>
References: <5B958451-72D1-4039-A67C-77A8B9ADD558@kcl.ac.uk>
 <CALzTN-T+jiOHhyUM+q8RPkGe8Niztv=bs07vx-mKUUHak+GRQQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <54FB17C1-10F7-404C-85CA-FD0F77F2E630@gmail.com>
 <DM2PR07MB350D62263920E2F35B542CFD8850@DM2PR07MB350.namprd07.prod.outlook.com>
 <CALzTN-Qj8e+gkfPPkxiA_D34=zbCQsfNWR=2Fi+K=5HimzM5MA@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAPf2UMTCcf663zhZhc4YxK4bR8KHxRe-kw46ZpEJdyoqy=dsCA@mail.gmail.com>
 <CALzTN-Q0VJnD0MGN0q0grZYce7=2exTBMvC2RtHpftOMLTQDSg@mail.gmail.com>
 <CALzTN-TsuMp+ukHR_wqFRkB1TmDsbMF_8wgXNOBEoVTAF-Tg6A@mail.gmail.com>
 <DM2PR07MB3502E7C9FFA7C4EF91C9A0CD89B0@DM2PR07MB350.namprd07.prod.outlook.com>
Message-ID: <CADZJ4hPOT6zDUKgNy0XnSBDCvGfu_t3F5GMdV_Qa-Vw7AE2K_A@mail.gmail.com>

I guess I never really liked adding the community list. Seems like a
user list and developer list covers everyone. VTK has one of each as
does Slicer.

On Sat, Apr 2, 2016 at 10:46 AM, Andras Lasso <lasso at queensu.ca> wrote:
> Instead of asking people to decide between final solutions (which is
> difficult for them and also doesn?t reveal actual preferences), please ask
> what people need. If preferences are known then you can choose the best
> fitting solution. For example good questions would be:
>
>
>
> 1.       I?m interested in discussions about how to use ITK:
>
> a.       Yes
>
> b.       Not that much, but I don?t mind getting emails about it
>
> c.       No, and I don?t want to see any emails about it
>
> 2.       I?m interested in discussions about ITK internals and how it is
> being developed:
>
> a.       Yes
>
> b.       Not that much, but I don?t mind getting emails about it
>
> c.       No, and I don?t want to see any emails about it
>
> 3.       If the ITK mailing list that I subscribed to changes in scope,
> then:
>
> a.       Subscribe me to the new list
>
> b.       Just remove me from the mailing list; I?ll subscribe manually to
> the new list if I?m interested
>
>
>
> Andras
>
>
>
> From: Matt McCormick [mailto:matt.mccormick at kitware.com]
> Sent: April 2, 2016 12:18 PM
> To: D?enan Zuki? <dzenanz at gmail.com>
> Cc: Andras Lasso <lasso at queensu.ca>; community at itk.org;
> insight-users at itk.org; ITK <insight-developers at itk.org>
>
>
> Subject: Re: [ITK] Community versus Users Lists
>
>
>
> Here is a draft of the poll:
>
>
> https://docs.google.com/forms/d/19BL8Gbb3Z0qdekys2i6keHPZSdkSOgbRg84mWOhEu8U/viewform
>
> Are there any suggestions on the wording? Missing options?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Matt
>
>
>
> On Tue, Mar 29, 2016 at 12:16 PM, Matt McCormick
> <matt.mccormick at kitware.com> wrote:
>
> Doodle polls are usually for scheduling times only (as far as I am
> aware).  Perhaps a Google Form?
>
> M
>
>
> On Tue, Mar 29, 2016 at 11:10 AM, D?enan Zuki? <dzenanz at gmail.com> wrote:
>> Hi everyone,
>>
>> since ITK is now in a mature phase, there is not a lot of traffic on
>> ITK-Developers. I suppose the best would be to completely transition to
>> just
>> one list (community) which was created for that purpose. This would
>> simplify
>> things.
>>
>> But having a poll sounds like a good idea. Did you mean something like a
>> Doodle poll, or somehow restrict the poll to just the members of the 3
>> mailing lists?
>>
>> Regards,
>> D?enan
>>
>> On Sat, Mar 26, 2016 at 11:22 PM, Matt McCormick
>> <matt.mccormick at kitware.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> The current situation is not optimal, and it is difficult to keep all
>>> parties involved happy.
>>>
>>> - Some people do not want to be bothered to subscribe to more than one
>>> list, be it community, insight-users, or insight-developers.
>>> - Some people on insight-developers do not want to be auto-subscribed
>>> to a different list that has a different amount of traffic.
>>> - There are a number of non-mailman interfaces to the mailing lists
>>> that may not adapt to changes (Nabble, GMane, etc.), and some people
>>> use these interfaces exclusively.
>>>
>>> Any change will result in some unhappy campers, but some change may
>>> still be necessary to improve the status quo.
>>>
>>> Perhaps we should create a poll distributed to all lists to select a
>>> way forward? Other constructive ideas?
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Matt
>>>
>>> On Sat, Mar 26, 2016 at 10:01 PM, Andras Lasso <lasso at queensu.ca> wrote:
>>> > I completely agree. Either a single community list or pair of
>>> > devel&users
>>> > makes sense.
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > My personal experience: I've signed up to the community list when it
>>> > was
>>> > created and unsubscribed from users. However, it was quite annoying
>>> > that
>>> > I
>>> > received emails from users list but my responses were bounced. So, I
>>> > had
>>> > to
>>> > sign up again to the users list. I still don?t know where to send new
>>> > posts:
>>> > users or community.
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > Andras
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > From: Michka Popoff
>>> > Sent: March 26, 2016 14:24
>>> > To: Matt McCormick
>>> > Cc: community at itk.org
>>> > Subject: Re: [ITK] Community versus Users Lists
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > Hi
>>> >
>>> > one thought about this. If I remember well, (but I may be mistaken),
>>> > the community at itk.org address was introduced to replace the two others.
>>> >
>>> > Now, we have to follow 3 different mailing lists. The mail traffic is
>>> > okay
>>> > for me on
>>> > these 3 lists, so having only one would be great.
>>> > It would help people to know which one to use.
>>> >
>>> > Or we should go back to the old behaviour, with a user/developer list.
>>> > But I think developers want also to know what they users are doing,
>>> > so they are often registered on the two (/three) anyway.
>>> >
>>> > Michka
>>> >
>>> >> On 17 Mar 2016, at 16:42, Matt McCormick <matt.mccormick at kitware.com>
>>> >> wrote:
>>> >>
>>> >> Hi Toby,
>>> >>
>>> >> To post to the insight-users or insight-developers list, your email
>>> >> account currently needs to be subscribed there, too.
>>> >>
>>> >> Matt
>>> >>
>>> >> On Thu, Mar 17, 2016 at 5:47 AM, Wood, Tobias <tobias.wood at kcl.ac.uk>
>>> >> wrote:
>>> >>> Hello,
>>> >>>
>>> >>> Apologies for a newbie question but this has been bugging me for a
>>> >>> while.
>>> >>> I am subscribed to the community at itk.org mailing list. As noted on
>>> >>> the
>>> >>> sign-up page, this also receives all the mail from insight-users (and
>>> >>> insight-developers). When I try to reply to a message from one of
>>> >>> these
>>> >>> lists in my mail client, the reply-to address is set to
>>> >>> insight-users.
>>> >>> If I
>>> >>> send the message as is, I get a failure message telling me I am not
>>> >>> subscribed to the mailing list (which is correct).
>>> >>>
>>> >>>
>>> >>> How should I be responding to such e-mail threads? Will a reply to
>>> >>> community at itk.org forward the message on to insight-users? Or should
>>> >>> I
>>> >>> be
>>> >>> subscribing to all 3 mailing lists (seems suboptimal as I assume I
>>> >>> will get
>>> >>> multiple copies of messages).
>>> >>>
>>> >>> Thanks,
>>> >>> Toby
>>> >>> _______________________________________________
>>> >>> Community mailing list
>>> >>> Community at itk.org
>>> >>> http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/community
>>> >> _______________________________________________
>>> >> Community mailing list
>>> >> Community at itk.org
>>> >> http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/community
>>> >
>>> > _______________________________________________
>>> > Community mailing list
>>> > Community at itk.org
>>> > http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/community
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Community mailing list
>>> Community at itk.org
>>> http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/community
>>
>>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Community mailing list
> Community at itk.org
> http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/community
>



-- 
Unpaid intern in BillsBasement at noware dot com

From matt.mccormick at kitware.com  Sat Apr  2 21:27:09 2016
From: matt.mccormick at kitware.com (Matt McCormick)
Date: Sat, 2 Apr 2016 21:27:09 -0400
Subject: [ITK-dev] [ITK] Community versus Users Lists
In-Reply-To: <CADZJ4hPOT6zDUKgNy0XnSBDCvGfu_t3F5GMdV_Qa-Vw7AE2K_A@mail.gmail.com>
References: <5B958451-72D1-4039-A67C-77A8B9ADD558@kcl.ac.uk>
 <CALzTN-T+jiOHhyUM+q8RPkGe8Niztv=bs07vx-mKUUHak+GRQQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <54FB17C1-10F7-404C-85CA-FD0F77F2E630@gmail.com>
 <DM2PR07MB350D62263920E2F35B542CFD8850@DM2PR07MB350.namprd07.prod.outlook.com>
 <CALzTN-Qj8e+gkfPPkxiA_D34=zbCQsfNWR=2Fi+K=5HimzM5MA@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAPf2UMTCcf663zhZhc4YxK4bR8KHxRe-kw46ZpEJdyoqy=dsCA@mail.gmail.com>
 <CALzTN-Q0VJnD0MGN0q0grZYce7=2exTBMvC2RtHpftOMLTQDSg@mail.gmail.com>
 <CALzTN-TsuMp+ukHR_wqFRkB1TmDsbMF_8wgXNOBEoVTAF-Tg6A@mail.gmail.com>
 <DM2PR07MB3502E7C9FFA7C4EF91C9A0CD89B0@DM2PR07MB350.namprd07.prod.outlook.com>
 <CADZJ4hPOT6zDUKgNy0XnSBDCvGfu_t3F5GMdV_Qa-Vw7AE2K_A@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CALzTN-RzEO47m5VonUxhtjD-i6keYrdjXJkOZ554m4Q81igwAA@mail.gmail.com>

Since ITK is a programming library that is used to build an
application (it is not an application,) everyone that uses ITK is a
developer. Since every developer's contribution is treated with
respect based on its merit, it is not desirable to separate people
based into two buckets based on personal connections.

Messages sent to insight-users are often related to ITK's internals
and how it is being developed. Recent threads on insight-users include

- How to fix builds against a third party library [1]
- How to add Python wrapping to a class inside ITK [2]
- How to fix a MinGW build error [3]

Understanding how ITK works, fixing bugs, and improving functionality
are often required when using ITK to address a problem.

It is also annoying to have three (or two) mailing lists to subscribe to.


I think improved preference-based questions that recognize ITK's
identity as a community developed open source library are:

1. If the ITK mailing list that I subscribed to changes in scope, then:
  a. Subscribe me to the new list
  b. Just remove me from the mailing list; I?ll subscribe manually to
the new list if I?m interested

2. The number of mailing lists I prefer is:
  a. 1
  b. 2
  c. 3

3. If there are two mailing lists, I prefer
  a. community and insight-users
  b. community and insight-developers
  c. insight-users and insight-developers

4. If there is one mailing list, I prefer
  a. community
  b. insight-users
  c. insight-developers


2 cents,
Matt

[1] http://public.kitware.com/pipermail/insight-users/2016-April/053317.html
[2] http://public.kitware.com/pipermail/insight-users/2016-April/053318.html
[3] http://public.kitware.com/pipermail/insight-users/2016-March/053190.html
[4] http://public.kitware.com/pipermail/insight-developers/2016-February/024782.html

On Sat, Apr 2, 2016 at 2:00 PM, Bill Lorensen <bill.lorensen at gmail.com> wrote:
> I guess I never really liked adding the community list. Seems like a
> user list and developer list covers everyone. VTK has one of each as
> does Slicer.
>
> On Sat, Apr 2, 2016 at 10:46 AM, Andras Lasso <lasso at queensu.ca> wrote:
>> Instead of asking people to decide between final solutions (which is
>> difficult for them and also doesn?t reveal actual preferences), please ask
>> what people need. If preferences are known then you can choose the best
>> fitting solution. For example good questions would be:
>>
>>
>>
>> 1.       I?m interested in discussions about how to use ITK:
>>
>> a.       Yes
>>
>> b.       Not that much, but I don?t mind getting emails about it
>>
>> c.       No, and I don?t want to see any emails about it
>>
>> 2.       I?m interested in discussions about ITK internals and how it is
>> being developed:
>>
>> a.       Yes
>>
>> b.       Not that much, but I don?t mind getting emails about it
>>
>> c.       No, and I don?t want to see any emails about it
>>
>> 3.       If the ITK mailing list that I subscribed to changes in scope,
>> then:
>>
>> a.       Subscribe me to the new list
>>
>> b.       Just remove me from the mailing list; I?ll subscribe manually to
>> the new list if I?m interested
>>
>>
>>
>> Andras
>>
>>
>>
>> From: Matt McCormick [mailto:matt.mccormick at kitware.com]
>> Sent: April 2, 2016 12:18 PM
>> To: D?enan Zuki? <dzenanz at gmail.com>
>> Cc: Andras Lasso <lasso at queensu.ca>; community at itk.org;
>> insight-users at itk.org; ITK <insight-developers at itk.org>
>>
>>
>> Subject: Re: [ITK] Community versus Users Lists
>>
>>
>>
>> Here is a draft of the poll:
>>
>>
>> https://docs.google.com/forms/d/19BL8Gbb3Z0qdekys2i6keHPZSdkSOgbRg84mWOhEu8U/viewform
>>
>> Are there any suggestions on the wording? Missing options?
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Matt
>>
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Mar 29, 2016 at 12:16 PM, Matt McCormick
>> <matt.mccormick at kitware.com> wrote:
>>
>> Doodle polls are usually for scheduling times only (as far as I am
>> aware).  Perhaps a Google Form?
>>
>> M
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Mar 29, 2016 at 11:10 AM, D?enan Zuki? <dzenanz at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Hi everyone,
>>>
>>> since ITK is now in a mature phase, there is not a lot of traffic on
>>> ITK-Developers. I suppose the best would be to completely transition to
>>> just
>>> one list (community) which was created for that purpose. This would
>>> simplify
>>> things.
>>>
>>> But having a poll sounds like a good idea. Did you mean something like a
>>> Doodle poll, or somehow restrict the poll to just the members of the 3
>>> mailing lists?
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> D?enan
>>>
>>> On Sat, Mar 26, 2016 at 11:22 PM, Matt McCormick
>>> <matt.mccormick at kitware.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> The current situation is not optimal, and it is difficult to keep all
>>>> parties involved happy.
>>>>
>>>> - Some people do not want to be bothered to subscribe to more than one
>>>> list, be it community, insight-users, or insight-developers.
>>>> - Some people on insight-developers do not want to be auto-subscribed
>>>> to a different list that has a different amount of traffic.
>>>> - There are a number of non-mailman interfaces to the mailing lists
>>>> that may not adapt to changes (Nabble, GMane, etc.), and some people
>>>> use these interfaces exclusively.
>>>>
>>>> Any change will result in some unhappy campers, but some change may
>>>> still be necessary to improve the status quo.
>>>>
>>>> Perhaps we should create a poll distributed to all lists to select a
>>>> way forward? Other constructive ideas?
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Matt
>>>>
>>>> On Sat, Mar 26, 2016 at 10:01 PM, Andras Lasso <lasso at queensu.ca> wrote:
>>>> > I completely agree. Either a single community list or pair of
>>>> > devel&users
>>>> > makes sense.
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> > My personal experience: I've signed up to the community list when it
>>>> > was
>>>> > created and unsubscribed from users. However, it was quite annoying
>>>> > that
>>>> > I
>>>> > received emails from users list but my responses were bounced. So, I
>>>> > had
>>>> > to
>>>> > sign up again to the users list. I still don?t know where to send new
>>>> > posts:
>>>> > users or community.
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> > Andras
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> > From: Michka Popoff
>>>> > Sent: March 26, 2016 14:24
>>>> > To: Matt McCormick
>>>> > Cc: community at itk.org
>>>> > Subject: Re: [ITK] Community versus Users Lists
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> > Hi
>>>> >
>>>> > one thought about this. If I remember well, (but I may be mistaken),
>>>> > the community at itk.org address was introduced to replace the two others.
>>>> >
>>>> > Now, we have to follow 3 different mailing lists. The mail traffic is
>>>> > okay
>>>> > for me on
>>>> > these 3 lists, so having only one would be great.
>>>> > It would help people to know which one to use.
>>>> >
>>>> > Or we should go back to the old behaviour, with a user/developer list.
>>>> > But I think developers want also to know what they users are doing,
>>>> > so they are often registered on the two (/three) anyway.
>>>> >
>>>> > Michka
>>>> >
>>>> >> On 17 Mar 2016, at 16:42, Matt McCormick <matt.mccormick at kitware.com>
>>>> >> wrote:
>>>> >>
>>>> >> Hi Toby,
>>>> >>
>>>> >> To post to the insight-users or insight-developers list, your email
>>>> >> account currently needs to be subscribed there, too.
>>>> >>
>>>> >> Matt
>>>> >>
>>>> >> On Thu, Mar 17, 2016 at 5:47 AM, Wood, Tobias <tobias.wood at kcl.ac.uk>
>>>> >> wrote:
>>>> >>> Hello,
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>> Apologies for a newbie question but this has been bugging me for a
>>>> >>> while.
>>>> >>> I am subscribed to the community at itk.org mailing list. As noted on
>>>> >>> the
>>>> >>> sign-up page, this also receives all the mail from insight-users (and
>>>> >>> insight-developers). When I try to reply to a message from one of
>>>> >>> these
>>>> >>> lists in my mail client, the reply-to address is set to
>>>> >>> insight-users.
>>>> >>> If I
>>>> >>> send the message as is, I get a failure message telling me I am not
>>>> >>> subscribed to the mailing list (which is correct).
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>> How should I be responding to such e-mail threads? Will a reply to
>>>> >>> community at itk.org forward the message on to insight-users? Or should
>>>> >>> I
>>>> >>> be
>>>> >>> subscribing to all 3 mailing lists (seems suboptimal as I assume I
>>>> >>> will get
>>>> >>> multiple copies of messages).
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>> Thanks,
>>>> >>> Toby
>>>> >>> _______________________________________________
>>>> >>> Community mailing list
>>>> >>> Community at itk.org
>>>> >>> http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/community
>>>> >> _______________________________________________
>>>> >> Community mailing list
>>>> >> Community at itk.org
>>>> >> http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/community
>>>> >
>>>> > _______________________________________________
>>>> > Community mailing list
>>>> > Community at itk.org
>>>> > http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/community
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Community mailing list
>>>> Community at itk.org
>>>> http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/community
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Community mailing list
>> Community at itk.org
>> http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/community
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Unpaid intern in BillsBasement at noware dot com

From bill.lorensen at gmail.com  Mon Apr  4 14:05:45 2016
From: bill.lorensen at gmail.com (Bill Lorensen)
Date: Mon, 4 Apr 2016 11:05:45 -0700
Subject: [ITK-dev] itkHDF5ImageIOTest valgrind defect reappears
Message-ID: <CADZJ4hOEqLs95WJNq5avWpR8sweXZKa-jfdF2YND0Fk2ai2c3A@mail.gmail.com>

Folks,

This valgrind defect has reappeared:
https://open.cdash.org/viewDynamicAnalysisFile.php?id=3760090

I had fixed this a while back. This merged topic:
http://review.source.kitware.com/#/c/20961/
claims that my fix is no longer needed, but has reintroduced the
valgrind defect...


Bill

From zack.galbreath at kitware.com  Mon Apr  4 18:49:32 2016
From: zack.galbreath at kitware.com (Zack Galbreath)
Date: Mon, 4 Apr 2016 18:49:32 -0400
Subject: [ITK-dev] open.cdash.org upgrade
In-Reply-To: <CANgkMA46U2U216ivwaeP5_araEfiFu-YkYdeVVuAbJdm+AM9Sw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CANgkMA46U2U216ivwaeP5_araEfiFu-YkYdeVVuAbJdm+AM9Sw@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CANgkMA7Ywgb2vr8zikVXLBwbunUaBWSWXa7bxuzz=HZa4oZThQ@mail.gmail.com>

This upgrade is complete.  I verified that logins, various page loads, and
submissions are all working correctly, but please let me know if you
encounter any unexpected behavior.

On Fri, Apr 1, 2016 at 3:14 PM, Zack Galbreath <zack.galbreath at kitware.com>
wrote:

> I plan to upgrade open.cdash.org this coming Monday, April 4th, at 5pm
> EDT.  I expect the site to be unavailable for an hour or so while I perform
> this upgrade.  During this time CDash will not accept any incoming
> submissions.
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://public.kitware.com/pipermail/insight-developers/attachments/20160404/70f709c3/attachment.html>

From blowekamp at mail.nih.gov  Tue Apr  5 09:58:51 2016
From: blowekamp at mail.nih.gov (Bradley Lowekamp)
Date: Tue, 5 Apr 2016 09:58:51 -0400
Subject: [ITK-dev] HTTPS for ITK git?
Message-ID: <1C4A5FE3-F65A-4D53-A550-E8FDF20A6444@mail.nih.gov>

Hello,

Is supporting secure git download via https on the near term plan for itk.org <http://itk.org/>?

I thought it was coming soon a few months. This would be the preferred way to download ITK for superbuilds.

Thanks,
Brad
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://public.kitware.com/pipermail/insight-developers/attachments/20160405/84a2e25e/attachment.html>

From matt.mccormick at kitware.com  Tue Apr  5 12:19:32 2016
From: matt.mccormick at kitware.com (Matt McCormick)
Date: Tue, 5 Apr 2016 12:19:32 -0400
Subject: [ITK-dev] HTTPS for ITK git?
In-Reply-To: <1C4A5FE3-F65A-4D53-A550-E8FDF20A6444@mail.nih.gov>
References: <1C4A5FE3-F65A-4D53-A550-E8FDF20A6444@mail.nih.gov>
Message-ID: <CALzTN-TucUZmoCo_zPoXSFDVUL8UaX2Cq3rgWKoO+N_cFKDo9A@mail.gmail.com>

Hi,

The current estimate for https support is approximately within a month.

Thanks,
Matt

On Tue, Apr 5, 2016 at 9:58 AM, Bradley Lowekamp <blowekamp at mail.nih.gov> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Is supporting secure git download via https on the near term plan for
> itk.org?
>
> I thought it was coming soon a few months. This would be the preferred way
> to download ITK for superbuilds.
>
> Thanks,
> Brad
>
> _______________________________________________
> Powered by www.kitware.com
>
> Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
> http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html
>
> Kitware offers ITK Training Courses, for more information visit:
> http://kitware.com/products/protraining.php
>
> Please keep messages on-topic and check the ITK FAQ at:
> http://www.itk.org/Wiki/ITK_FAQ
>
> Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
> http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/insight-developers
>

From blowekamp at mail.nih.gov  Tue Apr  5 13:01:15 2016
From: blowekamp at mail.nih.gov (Bradly Lowekamp)
Date: Tue, 5 Apr 2016 13:01:15 -0400
Subject: [ITK-dev] HTTPS for ITK git?
In-Reply-To: <CALzTN-TucUZmoCo_zPoXSFDVUL8UaX2Cq3rgWKoO+N_cFKDo9A@mail.gmail.com>
References: <1C4A5FE3-F65A-4D53-A550-E8FDF20A6444@mail.nih.gov>
 <CALzTN-TucUZmoCo_zPoXSFDVUL8UaX2Cq3rgWKoO+N_cFKDo9A@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <8027EA08-AE00-45CF-8DA1-22697B3D0E25@mail.nih.gov>

That is awesome. I look forward to it.

Thanks!
> On Apr 5, 2016, at 12:19 PM, Matt McCormick <matt.mccormick at kitware.com> wrote:
> 
> Hi,
> 
> The current estimate for https support is approximately within a month.
> 
> Thanks,
> Matt
> 
> On Tue, Apr 5, 2016 at 9:58 AM, Bradley Lowekamp <blowekamp at mail.nih.gov> wrote:
>> Hello,
>> 
>> Is supporting secure git download via https on the near term plan for
>> itk.org?
>> 
>> I thought it was coming soon a few months. This would be the preferred way
>> to download ITK for superbuilds.
>> 
>> Thanks,
>> Brad
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Powered by www.kitware.com
>> 
>> Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
>> http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html
>> 
>> Kitware offers ITK Training Courses, for more information visit:
>> http://kitware.com/products/protraining.php
>> 
>> Please keep messages on-topic and check the ITK FAQ at:
>> http://www.itk.org/Wiki/ITK_FAQ
>> 
>> Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
>> http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/insight-developers
>> 


From blowekamp at mail.nih.gov  Wed Apr  6 09:17:56 2016
From: blowekamp at mail.nih.gov (Bradley Lowekamp)
Date: Wed, 6 Apr 2016 09:17:56 -0400
Subject: [ITK-dev] open.cdash.org upgrade
In-Reply-To: <CANgkMA7Ywgb2vr8zikVXLBwbunUaBWSWXa7bxuzz=HZa4oZThQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CANgkMA46U2U216ivwaeP5_araEfiFu-YkYdeVVuAbJdm+AM9Sw@mail.gmail.com>
 <CANgkMA7Ywgb2vr8zikVXLBwbunUaBWSWXa7bxuzz=HZa4oZThQ@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <8C3D3CAF-8664-44B8-9ABF-861003F5A69B@mail.nih.gov>

Hello Zack,

I can?t seem to find the Notes with the dashboard submissions. I am expected to see the attached CTest build scripts. I have place the GUI in advanced view, but no notes? Where can they be?

Thanks,
Brad

> On Apr 4, 2016, at 6:49 PM, Zack Galbreath <zack.galbreath at kitware.com> wrote:
> 
> This upgrade is complete.  I verified that logins, various page loads, and submissions are all working correctly, but please let me know if you encounter any unexpected behavior.
> 
> On Fri, Apr 1, 2016 at 3:14 PM, Zack Galbreath <zack.galbreath at kitware.com <mailto:zack.galbreath at kitware.com>> wrote:
> I plan to upgrade open.cdash.org <http://open.cdash.org/> this coming Monday, April 4th, at 5pm EDT.  I expect the site to be unavailable for an hour or so while I perform this upgrade.  During this time CDash will not accept any incoming submissions.
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Powered by www.kitware.com
> 
> Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
> http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html
> 
> Kitware offers ITK Training Courses, for more information visit:
> http://kitware.com/products/protraining.php
> 
> Please keep messages on-topic and check the ITK FAQ at:
> http://www.itk.org/Wiki/ITK_FAQ
> 
> Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
> http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/insight-developers

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://public.kitware.com/pipermail/insight-developers/attachments/20160406/4222db95/attachment.html>

From zack.galbreath at kitware.com  Wed Apr  6 10:17:40 2016
From: zack.galbreath at kitware.com (Zack Galbreath)
Date: Wed, 6 Apr 2016 10:17:40 -0400
Subject: [ITK-dev] open.cdash.org upgrade
In-Reply-To: <8C3D3CAF-8664-44B8-9ABF-861003F5A69B@mail.nih.gov>
References: <CANgkMA46U2U216ivwaeP5_araEfiFu-YkYdeVVuAbJdm+AM9Sw@mail.gmail.com>
 <CANgkMA7Ywgb2vr8zikVXLBwbunUaBWSWXa7bxuzz=HZa4oZThQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <8C3D3CAF-8664-44B8-9ABF-861003F5A69B@mail.nih.gov>
Message-ID: <CANgkMA6q8cvwyFzjSNk8O7OZDv4r2gdS__PH2QfnDBuJ8mQigA@mail.gmail.com>

On Wed, Apr 6, 2016 at 9:17 AM, Bradley Lowekamp <blowekamp at mail.nih.gov>
wrote:

> Hello Zack,
>
> I can?t seem to find the Notes with the dashboard submissions. I am
> expected to see the attached CTest build scripts. I have place the GUI in
> advanced view, but no notes? Where can they be?
>

Thanks for letting me know.  I'll look into it & report back when this
issue is fixed.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://public.kitware.com/pipermail/insight-developers/attachments/20160406/737430a6/attachment.html>

From zack.galbreath at kitware.com  Wed Apr  6 15:17:46 2016
From: zack.galbreath at kitware.com (Zack Galbreath)
Date: Wed, 6 Apr 2016 15:17:46 -0400
Subject: [ITK-dev] open.cdash.org upgrade
In-Reply-To: <CANgkMA6q8cvwyFzjSNk8O7OZDv4r2gdS__PH2QfnDBuJ8mQigA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CANgkMA46U2U216ivwaeP5_araEfiFu-YkYdeVVuAbJdm+AM9Sw@mail.gmail.com>
 <CANgkMA7Ywgb2vr8zikVXLBwbunUaBWSWXa7bxuzz=HZa4oZThQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <8C3D3CAF-8664-44B8-9ABF-861003F5A69B@mail.nih.gov>
 <CANgkMA6q8cvwyFzjSNk8O7OZDv4r2gdS__PH2QfnDBuJ8mQigA@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CANgkMA5u13vuZmoE8k6Y2JzFacXb1CU8CjebX4EYt+UVV72sVA@mail.gmail.com>

On Wed, Apr 6, 2016 at 10:17 AM, Zack Galbreath <zack.galbreath at kitware.com>
wrote:

> On Wed, Apr 6, 2016 at 9:17 AM, Bradley Lowekamp <blowekamp at mail.nih.gov>
> wrote:
>
>> Hello Zack,
>>
>> I can?t seem to find the Notes with the dashboard submissions. I am
>> expected to see the attached CTest build scripts. I have place the GUI in
>> advanced view, but no notes? Where can they be?
>>
>

This icon is back now.  As before, you'll need to enable 'Advanced View' to
see it (click the gear icon).
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://public.kitware.com/pipermail/insight-developers/attachments/20160406/f7b75549/attachment.html>

From blowekamp at mail.nih.gov  Wed Apr  6 15:25:31 2016
From: blowekamp at mail.nih.gov (Bradly Lowekamp)
Date: Wed, 6 Apr 2016 15:25:31 -0400
Subject: [ITK-dev] open.cdash.org upgrade
In-Reply-To: <CANgkMA5u13vuZmoE8k6Y2JzFacXb1CU8CjebX4EYt+UVV72sVA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CANgkMA46U2U216ivwaeP5_araEfiFu-YkYdeVVuAbJdm+AM9Sw@mail.gmail.com>
 <CANgkMA7Ywgb2vr8zikVXLBwbunUaBWSWXa7bxuzz=HZa4oZThQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <8C3D3CAF-8664-44B8-9ABF-861003F5A69B@mail.nih.gov>
 <CANgkMA6q8cvwyFzjSNk8O7OZDv4r2gdS__PH2QfnDBuJ8mQigA@mail.gmail.com>
 <CANgkMA5u13vuZmoE8k6Y2JzFacXb1CU8CjebX4EYt+UVV72sVA@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <2F32550C-C751-420D-A2E9-179304305878@mail.nih.gov>

Great!

Thank you.

Brad

> On Apr 6, 2016, at 3:17 PM, Zack Galbreath <zack.galbreath at kitware.com> wrote:
> 
> On Wed, Apr 6, 2016 at 10:17 AM, Zack Galbreath <zack.galbreath at kitware.com <mailto:zack.galbreath at kitware.com>> wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 6, 2016 at 9:17 AM, Bradley Lowekamp <blowekamp at mail.nih.gov <mailto:blowekamp at mail.nih.gov>> wrote:
> Hello Zack,
> 
> I can?t seem to find the Notes with the dashboard submissions. I am expected to see the attached CTest build scripts. I have place the GUI in advanced view, but no notes? Where can they be?
> 
> 
> This icon is back now.  As before, you'll need to enable 'Advanced View' to see it (click the gear icon).

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://public.kitware.com/pipermail/insight-developers/attachments/20160406/a772b0e1/attachment.html>

From matt.mccormick at kitware.com  Thu Apr  7 11:22:36 2016
From: matt.mccormick at kitware.com (Matt McCormick)
Date: Thu, 7 Apr 2016 11:22:36 -0400
Subject: [ITK-dev] Opportunities to share, discuss, design,
 and learn with other ITK community members
Message-ID: <CALzTN-RLnWxeBoLK=31+68nogEeVmeRPXnGpfOVCEvyjvfGmWw@mail.gmail.com>

There are a couple of upcoming opportunities to share, discuss, design, and
learn with your fellow ITK community members.


Today, 1:00 PM Eastern USA time, there will be a Google+ Hangout
where we will be doing code reviews:

  https://plus.google.com/u/1/events/c836joo7igljlmkfdih28i7u28g



On Friday, 11:00 AM Eastern USA time, an ITK development conference,

  https://plus.google.com/u/1/events/cs945gtfkhqnvaoq7t3h47vfdl4



For those that cannot join via Hangout, telephone call-in is also possible.
Dial:

  585-632-6296

Enter pin:

  31423



To get regular invites to these events, join the ITK Bar Camp G+ Community:

  https://plus.google.com/u/0/communities/111375098792764998322



All are welcome.  Hope to talk to you then!

From matt.mccormick at kitware.com  Thu Apr  7 11:47:10 2016
From: matt.mccormick at kitware.com (Matt McCormick)
Date: Thu, 7 Apr 2016 11:47:10 -0400
Subject: [ITK-dev] Patches for ITK 4.9.1
Message-ID: <CALzTN-Qpjpf3AoWuL4xzobXrVFz-5aVSe5CiPuZoSi+=Bja5TA@mail.gmail.com>

Hi folks,

The next patch (bugfix) release, ITK 4.9.1, will be released next
week. The patches currently on the Git release branch are:

 Bradley Lowekamp (1):
       BUG: Adding missing const qualifier for GetConfusionMatrix method

 Matthew McCormick (6):
       BUG: Remove Azure ExternalData resource.
       BUG: ExternalData downloads from midas3.kitware.com only supports https.
       BUG: slicer.kitware.com/midas3/ ExternalData will not support http.
       BUG: midas3.kitware.com only supports the https protocol.
       COMP: Do not specify COMPONENTS with find_package(VTK.
       COMP: Build against system HDF5 1.8.16.

 Michka Popoff (1):
       ENH: Wrap RayCastInterpolateImageFunction

Are there other patches that are missing? The patches should be
critical bugfixes, improved support for compilers, and documentation
fixes.

Thanks,
Matt

From blowekamp at mail.nih.gov  Thu Apr  7 12:03:58 2016
From: blowekamp at mail.nih.gov (Bradley Lowekamp)
Date: Thu, 7 Apr 2016 12:03:58 -0400
Subject: [ITK-dev] Patches for ITK 4.9.1
In-Reply-To: <CALzTN-Qpjpf3AoWuL4xzobXrVFz-5aVSe5CiPuZoSi+=Bja5TA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CALzTN-Qpjpf3AoWuL4xzobXrVFz-5aVSe5CiPuZoSi+=Bja5TA@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <100D2FAC-935C-4992-B133-6669E17105DC@mail.nih.gov>

Matt,

Please consider the following patch:

http://review.source.kitware.com/#/c/20977/ <http://review.source.kitware.com/#/c/20977/>

-B

> On Apr 7, 2016, at 11:47 AM, Matt McCormick <matt.mccormick at kitware.com> wrote:
> 
> Hi folks,
> 
> The next patch (bugfix) release, ITK 4.9.1, will be released next
> week. The patches currently on the Git release branch are:
> 
> Bradley Lowekamp (1):
>       BUG: Adding missing const qualifier for GetConfusionMatrix method
> 
> Matthew McCormick (6):
>       BUG: Remove Azure ExternalData resource.
>       BUG: ExternalData downloads from midas3.kitware.com only supports https.
>       BUG: slicer.kitware.com/midas3/ ExternalData will not support http.
>       BUG: midas3.kitware.com only supports the https protocol.
>       COMP: Do not specify COMPONENTS with find_package(VTK.
>       COMP: Build against system HDF5 1.8.16.
> 
> Michka Popoff (1):
>       ENH: Wrap RayCastInterpolateImageFunction
> 
> Are there other patches that are missing? The patches should be
> critical bugfixes, improved support for compilers, and documentation
> fixes.
> 
> Thanks,
> Matt
> _______________________________________________
> Powered by www.kitware.com
> 
> Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
> http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html
> 
> Kitware offers ITK Training Courses, for more information visit:
> http://kitware.com/products/protraining.php
> 
> Please keep messages on-topic and check the ITK FAQ at:
> http://www.itk.org/Wiki/ITK_FAQ
> 
> Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
> http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/insight-developers

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://public.kitware.com/pipermail/insight-developers/attachments/20160407/05f158c0/attachment.html>

From matt.mccormick at kitware.com  Thu Apr  7 12:45:20 2016
From: matt.mccormick at kitware.com (Matt McCormick)
Date: Thu, 7 Apr 2016 12:45:20 -0400
Subject: [ITK-dev] Patches for ITK 4.9.1
In-Reply-To: <100D2FAC-935C-4992-B133-6669E17105DC@mail.nih.gov>
References: <CALzTN-Qpjpf3AoWuL4xzobXrVFz-5aVSe5CiPuZoSi+=Bja5TA@mail.gmail.com>
 <100D2FAC-935C-4992-B133-6669E17105DC@mail.nih.gov>
Message-ID: <CALzTN-TRyE7QCpLjZk1M+86K-3YaGfHzdLu=A+VkwRroiqEo+A@mail.gmail.com>

Thanks! Merged to release.

On Thu, Apr 7, 2016 at 12:03 PM, Bradley Lowekamp
<blowekamp at mail.nih.gov> wrote:
> Matt,
>
> Please consider the following patch:
>
> http://review.source.kitware.com/#/c/20977/
>
> -B
>
> On Apr 7, 2016, at 11:47 AM, Matt McCormick <matt.mccormick at kitware.com>
> wrote:
>
> Hi folks,
>
> The next patch (bugfix) release, ITK 4.9.1, will be released next
> week. The patches currently on the Git release branch are:
>
> Bradley Lowekamp (1):
>       BUG: Adding missing const qualifier for GetConfusionMatrix method
>
> Matthew McCormick (6):
>       BUG: Remove Azure ExternalData resource.
>       BUG: ExternalData downloads from midas3.kitware.com only supports
> https.
>       BUG: slicer.kitware.com/midas3/ ExternalData will not support http.
>       BUG: midas3.kitware.com only supports the https protocol.
>       COMP: Do not specify COMPONENTS with find_package(VTK.
>       COMP: Build against system HDF5 1.8.16.
>
> Michka Popoff (1):
>       ENH: Wrap RayCastInterpolateImageFunction
>
> Are there other patches that are missing? The patches should be
> critical bugfixes, improved support for compilers, and documentation
> fixes.
>
> Thanks,
> Matt
> _______________________________________________
> Powered by www.kitware.com
>
> Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
> http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html
>
> Kitware offers ITK Training Courses, for more information visit:
> http://kitware.com/products/protraining.php
>
> Please keep messages on-topic and check the ITK FAQ at:
> http://www.itk.org/Wiki/ITK_FAQ
>
> Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
> http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/insight-developers
>
>

From matt.mccormick at kitware.com  Thu Apr  7 13:00:14 2016
From: matt.mccormick at kitware.com (Matt McCormick)
Date: Thu, 7 Apr 2016 13:00:14 -0400
Subject: [ITK-dev] ITK Mailing Lists Poll
Message-ID: <CALzTN-TtS12gcdNjEisdrfnxGXGf126mQGuBr5ArFb60o5FbMQ@mail.gmail.com>

Hi folks,

Please participate in this poll to inform improved use of our mailing lists:

  https://docs.google.com/forms/d/19BL8Gbb3Z0qdekys2i6keHPZSdkSOgbRg84mWOhEu8U/viewform



Thanks,
Matt

From sean at rogue-research.com  Thu Apr  7 16:28:38 2016
From: sean at rogue-research.com (Sean McBride)
Date: Thu, 7 Apr 2016 16:28:38 -0400
Subject: [ITK-dev] [ITK-users] ITK Mailing Lists Poll
In-Reply-To: <CALzTN-TtS12gcdNjEisdrfnxGXGf126mQGuBr5ArFb60o5FbMQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CALzTN-TtS12gcdNjEisdrfnxGXGf126mQGuBr5ArFb60o5FbMQ@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <20160407202838.206647319@mail.rogue-research.com>

On Thu, 7 Apr 2016 13:00:14 -0400, Matt McCormick said:

>Please participate in this poll to inform improved use of our mailing lists:
>
>  https://docs.google.com/forms/d/19B
>L8Gbb3Z0qdekys2i6keHPZSdkSOgbRg84mWOhEu8U/viewform

It seems to require a google account? :(

Cheers,

-- 
____________________________________________________________
Sean McBride, B. Eng                 sean at rogue-research.com
Rogue Research                        www.rogue-research.com 
Mac Software Developer              Montr?al, Qu?bec, Canada



From matt.mccormick at kitware.com  Thu Apr  7 16:34:14 2016
From: matt.mccormick at kitware.com (Matt McCormick)
Date: Thu, 7 Apr 2016 16:34:14 -0400
Subject: [ITK-dev] [ITK-users] ITK Mailing Lists Poll
In-Reply-To: <20160407202838.206647319@mail.rogue-research.com>
References: <CALzTN-TtS12gcdNjEisdrfnxGXGf126mQGuBr5ArFb60o5FbMQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <20160407202838.206647319@mail.rogue-research.com>
Message-ID: <CALzTN-S7aiTSw3SDabiAVOPZKYXwtYPTLaPggWbCJZ9+yp+dEg@mail.gmail.com>

On Thu, Apr 7, 2016 at 4:28 PM, Sean McBride <sean at rogue-research.com> wrote:
> On Thu, 7 Apr 2016 13:00:14 -0400, Matt McCormick said:
>
>>Please participate in this poll to inform improved use of our mailing lists:
>>
>>  https://docs.google.com/forms/d/19B
>>L8Gbb3Z0qdekys2i6keHPZSdkSOgbRg84mWOhEu8U/viewform
>
> It seems to require a google account? :(

Requirement lifted :-)

From blowekamp at mail.nih.gov  Fri Apr  8 13:42:02 2016
From: blowekamp at mail.nih.gov (Bradly Lowekamp)
Date: Fri, 8 Apr 2016 13:42:02 -0400
Subject: [ITK-dev] Not linking against libpython
In-Reply-To: <30415534-84E2-42DE-B460-86DA00537041@mail.nih.gov>
References: <56F42E02-CA6C-43BF-8240-01F262A68191@mail.nih.gov>
 <56F2FC37.1090501@kitware.com>
 <30415534-84E2-42DE-B460-86DA00537041@mail.nih.gov>
Message-ID: <76E2A331-A98D-42F9-A888-9699EF70FB68@mail.nih.gov>

Hello,

Thanks for your help with this issue.

Here is the resulting CMake ?module? created:

https://github.com/SimpleITK/SimpleITK/blob/master/CMake/sitkTargetLinkLibrariesWithDynamicLookup.cmake <https://github.com/SimpleITK/SimpleITK/blob/master/CMake/sitkTargetLinkLibrariesWithDynamicLookup.cmake>

It implements a function called sitk_target_link_libraries_with_dynamic_lookup. SimpleITK uses it for linking for all loadable modules to the wrapped languages libraries.

In CMake, Matt pointed to me that there is some undocumented functionality with not linking to LibPython in a undocumented PYTHON_ADD_MODULE method[1].


Please consider adding a bonified intrinsic CMake way of doing ?weak? or ?with dynamic lookup? linking, perhaps as a option to the target_link_libraries function.

Thanks!
Brad

[1] https://github.com/Kitware/CMake/blob/master/Modules/FindPythonLibs.cmake#L293

> On Mar 24, 2016, at 10:16 AM, Bradly Lowekamp <blowekamp at mail.nih.gov> wrote:
> 
> 
>> On Mar 23, 2016, at 4:27 PM, Brad King <brad.king at kitware.com> wrote:
>> 
>> On 03/23/2016 04:16 PM, Bradley Lowekamp wrote:
>>> 1) Is there a more CMAKE-ic way for doing this?
>>>  With all they library and linking properties?
>> 
>> I'm not certain what you're asking because if you don't want to link
>> to a library then don't pass it to target_link_libraries and then
>> propagation doesn't matter.  What role do you think CMake might play
>> in doing this?
> 
> I thought that there may have been something I was missing with options to target_link_librares options or the MODULE options in add_libraries.
> 
> What role could it?
> 1) There could be a target property corresponding to if undefined symbols are allowed. It would be true for this case of linux, where it defaults to allowing undefined symbols. Conversely OSX does not allow undefined symbols by default but has a flag to enable them.
> 2) There could be an additional target_link_library keyword to specify the type of linking, say ?WEAK?. This could cause a SHARED or MODULE target to to be linked against this library if undefined symbols are NOT allowed.
> 3) This is the first case I have seen where a MODULE library target, as in one intended to be dynamically loaded, should be handled differently.
> 
> 
> 
>> 
>>> 2) Is there a way to know if the linker allows undefined symbols
>>>  for shared libraries?
>> 
>> CMake does not provide this information directly.  You could use a
>> try_compile to test it.
> 
> Do you know of a try_compile example which creates a shared library? 
> 
> Just need to compile and link this as a shared library:  ?extern int bar(void); int foo(void) {return bar()+1;}?
> 
> Lastly I am working on a couple experiments here: https://github.com/blowekamp/CMakeSecondaryDependencies
> 
> Thanks!
> Brad
> 
>> 
>> -Brad K
>> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Powered by www.kitware.com
> 
> Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
> http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html
> 
> Kitware offers ITK Training Courses, for more information visit:
> http://kitware.com/products/protraining.php
> 
> Please keep messages on-topic and check the ITK FAQ at:
> http://www.itk.org/Wiki/ITK_FAQ
> 
> Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
> http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/insight-developers

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://public.kitware.com/pipermail/insight-developers/attachments/20160408/b5a73795/attachment.html>

From blowekamp at mail.nih.gov  Mon Apr 11 10:33:15 2016
From: blowekamp at mail.nih.gov (Bradly Lowekamp)
Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2016 10:33:15 -0400
Subject: [ITK-dev] open.cdash.org upgrade
In-Reply-To: <2F32550C-C751-420D-A2E9-179304305878@mail.nih.gov>
References: <CANgkMA46U2U216ivwaeP5_araEfiFu-YkYdeVVuAbJdm+AM9Sw@mail.gmail.com>
 <CANgkMA7Ywgb2vr8zikVXLBwbunUaBWSWXa7bxuzz=HZa4oZThQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <8C3D3CAF-8664-44B8-9ABF-861003F5A69B@mail.nih.gov>
 <CANgkMA6q8cvwyFzjSNk8O7OZDv4r2gdS__PH2QfnDBuJ8mQigA@mail.gmail.com>
 <CANgkMA5u13vuZmoE8k6Y2JzFacXb1CU8CjebX4EYt+UVV72sVA@mail.gmail.com>
 <2F32550C-C751-420D-A2E9-179304305878@mail.nih.gov>
Message-ID: <CF7AD34B-B626-495B-A7F3-C64CF13396CA@mail.nih.gov>

Zack,

One more problem I have had for a little bit.

I had been able to access a page with all the systems that ran a specific test. I could get here by clicking on the ?Status? or ?Time Status? column for a test from the page for a specific system.

For example:

From this page:
https://open.cdash.org/viewTest.php?onlypassed&buildid=4317608 <https://open.cdash.org/viewTest.php?onlypassed&buildid=4317608>

I could clink on one of the columns for the test: ?R.Example.FilterProgressReporting <https://open.cdash.org/testDetails.php?test=409698309&build=4317608>? and get all the systems where it was run. This is a very important feature, and information I?d like to know.

Thanks,
Brad


> On Apr 6, 2016, at 3:25 PM, Bradly Lowekamp <blowekamp at mail.nih.gov> wrote:
> 
> Great!
> 
> Thank you.
> 
> Brad
> 
>> On Apr 6, 2016, at 3:17 PM, Zack Galbreath <zack.galbreath at kitware.com <mailto:zack.galbreath at kitware.com>> wrote:
>> 
>> On Wed, Apr 6, 2016 at 10:17 AM, Zack Galbreath <zack.galbreath at kitware.com <mailto:zack.galbreath at kitware.com>> wrote:
>> On Wed, Apr 6, 2016 at 9:17 AM, Bradley Lowekamp <blowekamp at mail.nih.gov <mailto:blowekamp at mail.nih.gov>> wrote:
>> Hello Zack,
>> 
>> I can?t seem to find the Notes with the dashboard submissions. I am expected to see the attached CTest build scripts. I have place the GUI in advanced view, but no notes? Where can they be?
>> 
>> 
>> This icon is back now.  As before, you'll need to enable 'Advanced View' to see it (click the gear icon).
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Powered by www.kitware.com
> 
> Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
> http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html
> 
> Kitware offers ITK Training Courses, for more information visit:
> http://kitware.com/products/protraining.php
> 
> Please keep messages on-topic and check the ITK FAQ at:
> http://www.itk.org/Wiki/ITK_FAQ
> 
> Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
> http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/insight-developers

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://public.kitware.com/pipermail/insight-developers/attachments/20160411/a20078bd/attachment.html>

From zack.galbreath at kitware.com  Thu Apr 14 10:18:07 2016
From: zack.galbreath at kitware.com (Zack Galbreath)
Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2016 10:18:07 -0400
Subject: [ITK-dev] open.cdash.org upgrade
In-Reply-To: <CF7AD34B-B626-495B-A7F3-C64CF13396CA@mail.nih.gov>
References: <CANgkMA46U2U216ivwaeP5_araEfiFu-YkYdeVVuAbJdm+AM9Sw@mail.gmail.com>
 <CANgkMA7Ywgb2vr8zikVXLBwbunUaBWSWXa7bxuzz=HZa4oZThQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <8C3D3CAF-8664-44B8-9ABF-861003F5A69B@mail.nih.gov>
 <CANgkMA6q8cvwyFzjSNk8O7OZDv4r2gdS__PH2QfnDBuJ8mQigA@mail.gmail.com>
 <CANgkMA5u13vuZmoE8k6Y2JzFacXb1CU8CjebX4EYt+UVV72sVA@mail.gmail.com>
 <2F32550C-C751-420D-A2E9-179304305878@mail.nih.gov>
 <CF7AD34B-B626-495B-A7F3-C64CF13396CA@mail.nih.gov>
Message-ID: <CANgkMA5ieiSLEOz8HzCqK18h-T_NxCQe6Lbp18JePEGjSQYc6g@mail.gmail.com>

On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 10:33 AM, Bradly Lowekamp <blowekamp at mail.nih.gov>
wrote:

> Zack,
>
> One more problem I have had for a little bit.
>
> I had been able to access a page with all the systems that ran a specific
> test. I could get here by clicking on the ?Status? or ?Time Status? column
> for a test from the page for a specific system.
>
> For example:
>
> From this page:
> https://open.cdash.org/viewTest.php?onlypassed&buildid=4317608
>
> I could clink on one of the columns for the test: ?
> R.Example.FilterProgressReporting
> <https://open.cdash.org/testDetails.php?test=409698309&build=4317608>?
> and get all the systems where it was run. This is a very important feature,
> and information I?d like to know.
>

This view is still available, but it's been moved to the "Summary" column.


?

Determining how a test performed across builds is a bit expensive to
compute, so this column is generated using a follow-up API call after the
initial page load.  If you don't see the summary column right away it
should show up shortly after the page finishes loading.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://public.kitware.com/pipermail/insight-developers/attachments/20160414/fa56d694/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: test_summary.png
Type: image/png
Size: 62770 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://public.kitware.com/pipermail/insight-developers/attachments/20160414/fa56d694/attachment.png>

From matt.mccormick at kitware.com  Thu Apr 14 12:08:27 2016
From: matt.mccormick at kitware.com (Matt McCormick)
Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2016 12:08:27 -0400
Subject: [ITK-dev] [ANN] ITK 4.9.1 has been released!
Message-ID: <CALzTN-QMvrckGEYz4CzuWxrMQa1V-sVgxbNPEnQN1qvbnABOYQ@mail.gmail.com>

On behalf of the Insight Toolkit Community, we are happy to announce
the release of ITK 4.9.1!


Release files can be downloaded from:

 http://itk.org/ITK/resources/software.html


This is a patch release that fixes critical issues, regressions,
documentation, and compiler support. This release fixes builds against
system HDF5 1.8.16. It also avoids clobbering VTK_LIBRARIES in certain
cases when mixing a project that uses both ITK and VTK. Resource
servers that provide testing data and build tools at build time now
only support the HTTPS protocol; HTTP support has been removed. This
requires SSL support in the CMake binary used to build ITK.


Enjoy ITK!


Changes from v4.9.0 to v4.9.1:

Bradley Lowekamp (3):
     BUG: Adding missing const qualifier for GetConfusionMatrix method
     BUG: Use LargestPossible region for BSpline domain
     BUG: Remove errant file

Matthew McCormick (8):
     BUG: Remove Azure ExternalData resource.
     BUG: ExternalData downloads from midas3.kitware.com only supports https.
     BUG: slicer.kitware.com/midas3/ ExternalData will not support http.
     BUG: midas3.kitware.com only supports the https protocol.
     COMP: Do not specify COMPONENTS with find_package(VTK.
     COMP: Build against system HDF5 1.8.16.
     COMP: Make initial HDF5 discovery of 1.8.16 quiet.
     ENH: Bump CMakeLists.txt version 4.9.1.

Michka Popoff (1):
     ENH: Wrap RayCastInterpolateImageFunction

From matt.mccormick at kitware.com  Thu Apr 14 13:14:49 2016
From: matt.mccormick at kitware.com (Matt McCormick)
Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2016 13:14:49 -0400
Subject: [ITK-dev] ITK 4.10 release date
Message-ID: <CALzTN-T0vUcDHcMr2GoBwLdT7X7-eiarEun2CiNT+NL-t66gZA@mail.gmail.com>

Hi folks,

Since I will be away from keyboard for most of June, I propose a
change for the next scheduled feature release. We could start release
candidates May 9th, with the final release targeted for May 24th. Will
there be any issues with issues with this?

Thanks,
Matt

From hans-johnson at uiowa.edu  Mon Apr 18 11:16:14 2016
From: hans-johnson at uiowa.edu (Johnson, Hans J)
Date: Mon, 18 Apr 2016 15:16:14 +0000
Subject: [ITK-dev] global weak symbol vtable warnings
Message-ID: <2E3FBEBE-B4F4-4E89-9221-765E3B4790AA@uiowa.edu>

Hello ITK developers,

I?ve recently started getting "global weak symbol table? warnings when building the BRAINSTools package.

Before I dig in an try to figure out where the source of these warnings are coming from, has anyone else determined what needs to be done to build cleanly?

ld: warning: direct access in itk::Matrix<double, 3u, 3u>::GetInverse() const to global weak symbol vtable for vnl_svd<double> means the weak symbol cannot be overridden at runtime. This was likely caused by different translation units being compiled with different visibility settings.
ld: warning: direct access in itk::Matrix<double, 3u, 3u>::GetInverse() const to global weak symbol vtable for vnl_svd<double> means the weak symbol cannot be overridden at runtime. This was likely caused by different translation units being compiled with different visibility settings.
ld: warning: direct access in vnl_matrix_inverse<double>::~vnl_matrix_inverse() to global weak symbol vtable for vnl_svd<double> means the weak symbol cannot be overridden at runtime. This was likely caused by different translation units being compiled with different visibility settings.
ld: warning: direct access in vnl_matrix_inverse<double>::~vnl_matrix_inverse() to global weak symbol vtable for vnl_svd<double> means the weak symbol cannot be overridden at runtime. This was likely caused by different translation units being compiled with different visibility settings.
ld: warning: direct access in itk::Transform<float, 3u, 3u>::ComputeInverseJacobianWithRespectToPosition(itk::Point<float, 3u> const&, itk::Array2D<float>&) const to global weak symbol vtable for vnl_svd<float> means the weak symbol cannot be overridden at runtime. This was likely caused by different translation units being compiled with different visibility settings.
ld: warning: direct access in itk::Transform<float, 3u, 3u>::ComputeInverseJacobianWithRespectToPosition(itk::Point<float, 3u> const&, itk::Array2D<float>&) const to global weak symbol vtable for vnl_svd<float> means the weak symbol cannot be overridden at runtime. This was likely caused by different translation units being compiled with different visibility settings.

Thanks,
Hans


========================================================================

| Hans J. Johnson, Ph.D.,  Associate Professor                         |

| Appointments:                                                        |

|   - Electrical and Computer Engineering (Primary)                    |

|   - Biomedical Engineering                                           |

|   - Psychiatry                                     ,NMMM~            |

|   - Health Informatics                         MMMMMMMMMMMMMMN       |

|   - Iowa Institute for Biomedical Imaging    MMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM     |

|   - Iowa Informatics Institute             MMMMMMMMMMM MMMM MMM      |

|                                            MMMMMMMMMM I ?MMM  MM M   |

| hans-johnson at uiowa.edu                     MMMMMMM ,$M,        MMMM  |

| (319) 621 7185 (cell)                        MMMM~     MMMM   MMMMMM |

| (319) 384 3538  ECE Phone (Primary)           MM    8MMMMMM       MM |

|                                               M    MMMMMMM, ,M~    M |

| 4316 Seamans Center                                MMMMMM     MM     |

| Iowa City, IA 52242                                 ,?               |

========================================================================

http://emailcharter.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://public.kitware.com/pipermail/insight-developers/attachments/20160418/fea839b3/attachment.html>

From dshamoni at gmail.com  Wed Apr 20 07:07:53 2016
From: dshamoni at gmail.com (Denis Shamonin)
Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2016 13:07:53 +0200
Subject: [ITK-dev] BSplineTransform TransformPoint() crash
Message-ID: <CAGH7vHxciL-zKVTV0MYh7Nne0KtJOF2rmspGF5hHQP10zSWj6w@mail.gmail.com>

Dear Developers,

We have found the rare but reproducible crash during the resampling in
combination with BSplineTransform. Could you please review this issue on
JIRA? More details here:
https://issues.itk.org/jira/browse/ITK-3425

Thanks,

Denis P. Shamonin, MSc
Division of Image Processing (LKEB)
Department of Radiology
Leiden University Medical Center
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://public.kitware.com/pipermail/insight-developers/attachments/20160420/f6641d55/attachment.html>

From blowekamp at mail.nih.gov  Wed Apr 20 10:18:17 2016
From: blowekamp at mail.nih.gov (Bradley Lowekamp)
Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2016 10:18:17 -0400
Subject: [ITK-dev] BSplineTransform TransformPoint() crash
In-Reply-To: <CAGH7vHxciL-zKVTV0MYh7Nne0KtJOF2rmspGF5hHQP10zSWj6w@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAGH7vHxciL-zKVTV0MYh7Nne0KtJOF2rmspGF5hHQP10zSWj6w@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <EDFBD97D-EEAC-492F-B3BA-EF71565529F4@mail.nih.gov>

Hello,

Thank you for reporting this issue and providing a clear example and proposed solution.

In looking at the problematic function[1], I a quite surprised to see that the the signature of the method:
   bool BSplineTransform::InsideValidRegion( ContinuousIndexType & index ) const

Specifically, the argument is not constant and it is being modified by this problematic case.

I am suspicion of the need for this if statement in the method. It appears there may be a deeper issue with how the b-spline is defined over the upper range of the last index. The transform should be valid from (minIdx-0.5, maxIdx+0.5). I am going to also note that this case is not in itkBSPlineDeformableTransform.

Brad

[1] https://github.com/InsightSoftwareConsortium/ITK/blob/master/Modules/Core/Transform/include/itkBSplineTransform.hxx#L465-L495



> On Apr 20, 2016, at 7:07 AM, Denis Shamonin <dshamoni at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Dear Developers,
> 
> We have found the rare but reproducible crash during the resampling in combination with BSplineTransform. Could you please review this issue on JIRA? More details here:
> https://issues.itk.org/jira/browse/ITK-3425 <https://issues.itk.org/jira/browse/ITK-3425>
> Thanks,
> 
> Denis P. Shamonin, MSc
> Division of Image Processing (LKEB)
> Department of Radiology
> Leiden University Medical Center
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Powered by www.kitware.com
> 
> Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
> http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html
> 
> Kitware offers ITK Training Courses, for more information visit:
> http://kitware.com/products/protraining.php
> 
> Please keep messages on-topic and check the ITK FAQ at:
> http://www.itk.org/Wiki/ITK_FAQ
> 
> Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
> http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/insight-developers

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://public.kitware.com/pipermail/insight-developers/attachments/20160420/7acac0b4/attachment.html>

From matt.mccormick at kitware.com  Mon Apr 25 14:25:08 2016
From: matt.mccormick at kitware.com (Matt McCormick)
Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2016 14:25:08 -0400
Subject: [ITK-dev] ITK 4.10 release date
In-Reply-To: <CALzTN-T0vUcDHcMr2GoBwLdT7X7-eiarEun2CiNT+NL-t66gZA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CALzTN-T0vUcDHcMr2GoBwLdT7X7-eiarEun2CiNT+NL-t66gZA@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CALzTN-S66ctJxet7Kpcpw5foviBvH0ojT=npfS0fVumedYYqBQ@mail.gmail.com>

Hi,

The planned dates have been changed accordingly on the wiki and in the
issue tracker:

 http://www.itk.org/Wiki/ITK/Release_Schedule#Release_4.10_Schedule

Thanks,
Matt

On Thu, Apr 14, 2016 at 1:14 PM, Matt McCormick
<matt.mccormick at kitware.com> wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> Since I will be away from keyboard for most of June, I propose a
> change for the next scheduled feature release. We could start release
> candidates May 9th, with the final release targeted for May 24th. Will
> there be any issues with issues with this?
>
> Thanks,
> Matt

From hans-johnson at uiowa.edu  Mon Apr 25 20:28:38 2016
From: hans-johnson at uiowa.edu (Johnson, Hans J)
Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2016 00:28:38 +0000
Subject: [ITK-dev] Wrap ITK
Message-ID: <3BDCBAFD-7ECA-4E23-9C2A-8CFE9C6D0314@uiowa.edu>

Should I expect Wrapping ITK to work at the moment?


/scratch/johnsonhj/Dashboard/src/ITK-bld/Wrapping/Modules/ITKCommon/itkArrayPython.cpp:5385:27: error: too few arguments to function call, expected at least
      2, have 1
      (arg1)->SetData(arg2);
      ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~     ^
/scratch/johnsonhj/Dashboard/src/ITK/Modules/Core/Common/include/itkArray.h:161:3: note: 'SetData' declared here
  void SetData(TValue *data, SizeValueType sz, bool LetArrayManageMemory = false);
  ^
/scratch/johnsonhj/Dashboard/src/ITK-bld/Wrapping/Modules/ITKCommon/itkArrayPython.cpp:6502:27: error: too few arguments to function call, expected at least
      2, have 1
      (arg1)->SetData(arg2);
      ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~     ^
/scratch/johnsonhj/Dashboard/src/ITK/Modules/Core/Common/include/itkArray.h:161:3: note: 'SetData' declared here
  void SetData(TValue *data, SizeValueType sz, bool LetArrayManageMemory = false);
  ^
/scratch/johnsonhj/Dashboard/src/ITK-bld/Wrapping/Modules/ITKCommon/itkArrayPython.cpp:7619:27: error: too few arguments to function call, expected at least
      2, have 1
      (arg1)->SetData(arg2);
      ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~     ^
/scratch/johnsonhj/Dashboard/src/ITK/Modules/Core/Common/include/itkArray.h:161:3: note: 'SetData' declared here
  void SetData(TValue *data, SizeValueType sz, bool LetArrayManageMemory = false);
  ^
/scratch/johnsonhj/Dashboard/src/ITK-bld/Wrapping/Modules/ITKCommon/itkArrayPython.cpp:8736:27: error: too few arguments to function call, expected at least
      2, have 1
      (arg1)->SetData(arg2);
      ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~     ^
/scratch/johnsonhj/Dashboard/src/ITK/Modules/Core/Common/include/itkArray.h:161:3: note: 'SetData' declared here
  void SetData(TValue *data, SizeValueType sz, bool LetArrayManageMemory = false);



Just wondering if it is under development, or if it should still work?

Hans

-- 









On 4/25/16, 1:25 PM, "Insight-developers on behalf of Matt McCormick" <insight-developers-bounces at itk.org on behalf of matt.mccormick at kitware.com> wrote:

>Hi,
>
>The planned dates have been changed accordingly on the wiki and in the
>issue tracker:
>
> http://www.itk.org/Wiki/ITK/Release_Schedule#Release_4.10_Schedule
>
>Thanks,
>Matt
>
>On Thu, Apr 14, 2016 at 1:14 PM, Matt McCormick
><matt.mccormick at kitware.com> wrote:
>> Hi folks,
>>
>> Since I will be away from keyboard for most of June, I propose a
>> change for the next scheduled feature release. We could start release
>> candidates May 9th, with the final release targeted for May 24th. Will
>> there be any issues with issues with this?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Matt
>_______________________________________________
>Powered by www.kitware.com
>
>Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
>http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html
>
>Kitware offers ITK Training Courses, for more information visit:
>http://kitware.com/products/protraining.php
>
>Please keep messages on-topic and check the ITK FAQ at:
>http://www.itk.org/Wiki/ITK_FAQ
>
>Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
>http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/insight-developers

From kishoreraom at gmail.com  Mon Apr 25 22:59:31 2016
From: kishoreraom at gmail.com (Kishore Mosaliganti)
Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2016 22:59:31 -0400
Subject: [ITK-dev] ITK 4.10 release date
In-Reply-To: <CALzTN-S66ctJxet7Kpcpw5foviBvH0ojT=npfS0fVumedYYqBQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CALzTN-T0vUcDHcMr2GoBwLdT7X7-eiarEun2CiNT+NL-t66gZA@mail.gmail.com>
 <CALzTN-S66ctJxet7Kpcpw5foviBvH0ojT=npfS0fVumedYYqBQ@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CAP0PsnAozN0XMYTN_C9cY69=hfnDrSbhGKPFWdoRsm6JZ+CDcg@mail.gmail.com>

Hi all,

I was trying to develop GPU filters for tensor-voting and I just started
learning the ITK GPU framework. I believe the itkGPUImageFilterTest has a
bug in that it is not using a GPU filter but a CPU filter in the
instantiation and so this test is not doing what its designed for. Am I
right?

template< unsigned int VImageDimension >
int runGPUImageFilterTest(const std::string& inFile, const std::string&
outFile)
{
  typedef   unsigned char  InputPixelType;
  typedef   unsigned char  OutputPixelType;

  typedef itk::Image< InputPixelType,  VImageDimension >   InputImageType;
  typedef itk::Image< OutputPixelType, VImageDimension >   OutputImageType;

  typedef itk::ImageFileReader< InputImageType  >  ReaderType;
  typedef itk::ImageFileWriter< OutputImageType >  WriterType;

  typename ReaderType::Pointer reader = ReaderType::New();
  typename WriterType::Pointer writer = WriterType::New();

  reader->SetFileName( inFile );
  writer->SetFileName( outFile );

  //
  // Note: We use regular itk filter type here but factory will
automatically create
  //       GPU filter for Median filter and CPU filter for threshold filter.
  //
  typedef itk::MeanImageFilter< InputImageType, OutputImageType >
MeanFilterType;
  typedef itk::BinaryThresholdImageFilter< InputImageType, OutputImageType
> ThresholdFilterType;

  typename MeanFilterType::Pointer filter1 = MeanFilterType::New();
  typename MeanFilterType::Pointer filter2 = MeanFilterType::New();
  typename ThresholdFilterType::Pointer filter3 =
ThresholdFilterType::New();

  // Mean filter kernel radius
  typename InputImageType::SizeType indexRadius;
  indexRadius[0] = 2; // radius along x
  indexRadius[1] = 2; // radius along y
  if( VImageDimension > 2 )
  {
    indexRadius[2] = 2; // radius along z
  }

  // threshold parameters
  const InputPixelType upperThreshold = 255;
  const InputPixelType lowerThreshold = 175;
  const OutputPixelType outsideValue = 0;
  const OutputPixelType insideValue  = 255;

  filter1->SetRadius( indexRadius );
  filter2->SetRadius( indexRadius );
  filter3->SetOutsideValue( outsideValue );
  filter3->SetInsideValue(  insideValue  );
  filter3->SetUpperThreshold( upperThreshold );
  filter3->SetLowerThreshold( lowerThreshold );

  // build pipeline
  filter1->SetInput( reader->GetOutput() ); // copy CPU->GPU implicilty
  filter2->SetInput( filter1->GetOutput() );
  filter3->SetInput( filter2->GetOutput() );
  writer->SetInput( filter3->GetOutput() ); // copy GPU->CPU implicilty

  // execute pipeline filter and write output
  writer->Update();

  return EXIT_SUCCESS;
}


Kishore

On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 2:25 PM, Matt McCormick <matt.mccormick at kitware.com>
wrote:

> Hi,
>
> The planned dates have been changed accordingly on the wiki and in the
> issue tracker:
>
>  http://www.itk.org/Wiki/ITK/Release_Schedule#Release_4.10_Schedule
>
> Thanks,
> Matt
>
> On Thu, Apr 14, 2016 at 1:14 PM, Matt McCormick
> <matt.mccormick at kitware.com> wrote:
> > Hi folks,
> >
> > Since I will be away from keyboard for most of June, I propose a
> > change for the next scheduled feature release. We could start release
> > candidates May 9th, with the final release targeted for May 24th. Will
> > there be any issues with issues with this?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Matt
> _______________________________________________
> Powered by www.kitware.com
>
> Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
> http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html
>
> Kitware offers ITK Training Courses, for more information visit:
> http://kitware.com/products/protraining.php
>
> Please keep messages on-topic and check the ITK FAQ at:
> http://www.itk.org/Wiki/ITK_FAQ
>
> Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
> http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/insight-developers
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://public.kitware.com/pipermail/insight-developers/attachments/20160425/ca928b36/attachment.html>

From matt.mccormick at kitware.com  Mon Apr 25 23:10:09 2016
From: matt.mccormick at kitware.com (Matt McCormick)
Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2016 23:10:09 -0400
Subject: [ITK-dev] Wrap ITK
In-Reply-To: <3BDCBAFD-7ECA-4E23-9C2A-8CFE9C6D0314@uiowa.edu>
References: <3BDCBAFD-7ECA-4E23-9C2A-8CFE9C6D0314@uiowa.edu>
Message-ID: <CALzTN-Qa0Dg4buQKpUVL3GNvQg2UbY=Zsd=a+1-uhE6Zn4fNEQ@mail.gmail.com>

Hi Hans,

The wrapping is under active development, and, in general, it should
be working. To see the current status, check the "Expected Nightly
WrapITK" section of the dashboard:

  https://open.cdash.org/index.php?project=Insight&filtercount=1&showfilters=1&field1=groupname&compare1=63&value1=WrapITK


That particular error is related to this change:

  http://review.source.kitware.com/#/c/20918/


If your build is not a fresh build, it may not have picked up the API
change because of a bug in the wrapping build dependencies. The bug
was identified and an initial fix contributed here:

  http://review.source.kitware.com/#/c/21055/


Thanks,
Matt



On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 8:28 PM, Johnson, Hans J <hans-johnson at uiowa.edu> wrote:
> Should I expect Wrapping ITK to work at the moment?
>
>
> /scratch/johnsonhj/Dashboard/src/ITK-bld/Wrapping/Modules/ITKCommon/itkArrayPython.cpp:5385:27: error: too few arguments to function call, expected at least
>       2, have 1
>       (arg1)->SetData(arg2);
>       ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~     ^
> /scratch/johnsonhj/Dashboard/src/ITK/Modules/Core/Common/include/itkArray.h:161:3: note: 'SetData' declared here
>   void SetData(TValue *data, SizeValueType sz, bool LetArrayManageMemory = false);
>   ^
> /scratch/johnsonhj/Dashboard/src/ITK-bld/Wrapping/Modules/ITKCommon/itkArrayPython.cpp:6502:27: error: too few arguments to function call, expected at least
>       2, have 1
>       (arg1)->SetData(arg2);
>       ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~     ^
> /scratch/johnsonhj/Dashboard/src/ITK/Modules/Core/Common/include/itkArray.h:161:3: note: 'SetData' declared here
>   void SetData(TValue *data, SizeValueType sz, bool LetArrayManageMemory = false);
>   ^
> /scratch/johnsonhj/Dashboard/src/ITK-bld/Wrapping/Modules/ITKCommon/itkArrayPython.cpp:7619:27: error: too few arguments to function call, expected at least
>       2, have 1
>       (arg1)->SetData(arg2);
>       ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~     ^
> /scratch/johnsonhj/Dashboard/src/ITK/Modules/Core/Common/include/itkArray.h:161:3: note: 'SetData' declared here
>   void SetData(TValue *data, SizeValueType sz, bool LetArrayManageMemory = false);
>   ^
> /scratch/johnsonhj/Dashboard/src/ITK-bld/Wrapping/Modules/ITKCommon/itkArrayPython.cpp:8736:27: error: too few arguments to function call, expected at least
>       2, have 1
>       (arg1)->SetData(arg2);
>       ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~     ^
> /scratch/johnsonhj/Dashboard/src/ITK/Modules/Core/Common/include/itkArray.h:161:3: note: 'SetData' declared here
>   void SetData(TValue *data, SizeValueType sz, bool LetArrayManageMemory = false);
>
>
>
> Just wondering if it is under development, or if it should still work?
>
> Hans
>
> --
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On 4/25/16, 1:25 PM, "Insight-developers on behalf of Matt McCormick" <insight-developers-bounces at itk.org on behalf of matt.mccormick at kitware.com> wrote:
>
>>Hi,
>>
>>The planned dates have been changed accordingly on the wiki and in the
>>issue tracker:
>>
>> http://www.itk.org/Wiki/ITK/Release_Schedule#Release_4.10_Schedule
>>
>>Thanks,
>>Matt
>>
>>On Thu, Apr 14, 2016 at 1:14 PM, Matt McCormick
>><matt.mccormick at kitware.com> wrote:
>>> Hi folks,
>>>
>>> Since I will be away from keyboard for most of June, I propose a
>>> change for the next scheduled feature release. We could start release
>>> candidates May 9th, with the final release targeted for May 24th. Will
>>> there be any issues with issues with this?
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Matt
>>_______________________________________________
>>Powered by www.kitware.com
>>
>>Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
>>http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html
>>
>>Kitware offers ITK Training Courses, for more information visit:
>>http://kitware.com/products/protraining.php
>>
>>Please keep messages on-topic and check the ITK FAQ at:
>>http://www.itk.org/Wiki/ITK_FAQ
>>
>>Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
>>http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/insight-developers
> _______________________________________________
> Powered by www.kitware.com
>
> Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
> http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html
>
> Kitware offers ITK Training Courses, for more information visit:
> http://kitware.com/products/protraining.php
>
> Please keep messages on-topic and check the ITK FAQ at:
> http://www.itk.org/Wiki/ITK_FAQ
>
> Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
> http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/insight-developers

From matt.mccormick at kitware.com  Mon Apr 25 23:44:37 2016
From: matt.mccormick at kitware.com (Matt McCormick)
Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2016 23:44:37 -0400
Subject: [ITK-dev] ITK 4.10 release date
In-Reply-To: <CAP0PsnAozN0XMYTN_C9cY69=hfnDrSbhGKPFWdoRsm6JZ+CDcg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CALzTN-T0vUcDHcMr2GoBwLdT7X7-eiarEun2CiNT+NL-t66gZA@mail.gmail.com>
 <CALzTN-S66ctJxet7Kpcpw5foviBvH0ojT=npfS0fVumedYYqBQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAP0PsnAozN0XMYTN_C9cY69=hfnDrSbhGKPFWdoRsm6JZ+CDcg@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CALzTN-QGhJXD7kj4FdPe4+MTQTVfEem10hYs8p8SihBikOoFKg@mail.gmail.com>

Hi Kishore,

Perhaps we should add a GetNameOfClass() check to the test for the
instantiated filters? [1] They should return the GPU class names.

Thanks,
Matt

[1] http://www.itk.org/Doxygen/html/classitk_1_1LightObject.html#a79ef7b07e49bda75a90badf06f3d355c

On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 10:59 PM, Kishore Mosaliganti
<kishoreraom at gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I was trying to develop GPU filters for tensor-voting and I just started
> learning the ITK GPU framework. I believe the itkGPUImageFilterTest has a
> bug in that it is not using a GPU filter but a CPU filter in the
> instantiation and so this test is not doing what its designed for. Am I
> right?
>
> template< unsigned int VImageDimension >
> int runGPUImageFilterTest(const std::string& inFile, const std::string&
> outFile)
> {
>   typedef   unsigned char  InputPixelType;
>   typedef   unsigned char  OutputPixelType;
>
>   typedef itk::Image< InputPixelType,  VImageDimension >   InputImageType;
>   typedef itk::Image< OutputPixelType, VImageDimension >   OutputImageType;
>
>   typedef itk::ImageFileReader< InputImageType  >  ReaderType;
>   typedef itk::ImageFileWriter< OutputImageType >  WriterType;
>
>   typename ReaderType::Pointer reader = ReaderType::New();
>   typename WriterType::Pointer writer = WriterType::New();
>
>   reader->SetFileName( inFile );
>   writer->SetFileName( outFile );
>
>   //
>   // Note: We use regular itk filter type here but factory will
> automatically create
>   //       GPU filter for Median filter and CPU filter for threshold filter.
>   //
>   typedef itk::MeanImageFilter< InputImageType, OutputImageType >
> MeanFilterType;
>   typedef itk::BinaryThresholdImageFilter< InputImageType, OutputImageType >
> ThresholdFilterType;
>
>   typename MeanFilterType::Pointer filter1 = MeanFilterType::New();
>   typename MeanFilterType::Pointer filter2 = MeanFilterType::New();
>   typename ThresholdFilterType::Pointer filter3 =
> ThresholdFilterType::New();
>
>   // Mean filter kernel radius
>   typename InputImageType::SizeType indexRadius;
>   indexRadius[0] = 2; // radius along x
>   indexRadius[1] = 2; // radius along y
>   if( VImageDimension > 2 )
>   {
>     indexRadius[2] = 2; // radius along z
>   }
>
>   // threshold parameters
>   const InputPixelType upperThreshold = 255;
>   const InputPixelType lowerThreshold = 175;
>   const OutputPixelType outsideValue = 0;
>   const OutputPixelType insideValue  = 255;
>
>   filter1->SetRadius( indexRadius );
>   filter2->SetRadius( indexRadius );
>   filter3->SetOutsideValue( outsideValue );
>   filter3->SetInsideValue(  insideValue  );
>   filter3->SetUpperThreshold( upperThreshold );
>   filter3->SetLowerThreshold( lowerThreshold );
>
>   // build pipeline
>   filter1->SetInput( reader->GetOutput() ); // copy CPU->GPU implicilty
>   filter2->SetInput( filter1->GetOutput() );
>   filter3->SetInput( filter2->GetOutput() );
>   writer->SetInput( filter3->GetOutput() ); // copy GPU->CPU implicilty
>
>   // execute pipeline filter and write output
>   writer->Update();
>
>   return EXIT_SUCCESS;
> }
>
>
> Kishore
>
> On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 2:25 PM, Matt McCormick <matt.mccormick at kitware.com>
> wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> The planned dates have been changed accordingly on the wiki and in the
>> issue tracker:
>>
>>  http://www.itk.org/Wiki/ITK/Release_Schedule#Release_4.10_Schedule
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Matt
>>
>> On Thu, Apr 14, 2016 at 1:14 PM, Matt McCormick
>> <matt.mccormick at kitware.com> wrote:
>> > Hi folks,
>> >
>> > Since I will be away from keyboard for most of June, I propose a
>> > change for the next scheduled feature release. We could start release
>> > candidates May 9th, with the final release targeted for May 24th. Will
>> > there be any issues with issues with this?
>> >
>> > Thanks,
>> > Matt
>> _______________________________________________
>> Powered by www.kitware.com
>>
>> Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
>> http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html
>>
>> Kitware offers ITK Training Courses, for more information visit:
>> http://kitware.com/products/protraining.php
>>
>> Please keep messages on-topic and check the ITK FAQ at:
>> http://www.itk.org/Wiki/ITK_FAQ
>>
>> Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
>> http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/insight-developers
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Powered by www.kitware.com
>
> Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
> http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html
>
> Kitware offers ITK Training Courses, for more information visit:
> http://kitware.com/products/protraining.php
>
> Please keep messages on-topic and check the ITK FAQ at:
> http://www.itk.org/Wiki/ITK_FAQ
>
> Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
> http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/insight-developers
>

From zack.galbreath at kitware.com  Fri Apr 29 09:40:24 2016
From: zack.galbreath at kitware.com (Zack Galbreath)
Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2016 09:40:24 -0400
Subject: [ITK-dev] open.cdash.org upgrade
In-Reply-To: <CANgkMA7Ywgb2vr8zikVXLBwbunUaBWSWXa7bxuzz=HZa4oZThQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CANgkMA46U2U216ivwaeP5_araEfiFu-YkYdeVVuAbJdm+AM9Sw@mail.gmail.com>
 <CANgkMA7Ywgb2vr8zikVXLBwbunUaBWSWXa7bxuzz=HZa4oZThQ@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CANgkMA4CRO=uqHQX69=3W-34=Zst0xPkb8zOrPH2q60qm8Fgtg@mail.gmail.com>

I just performed another (small) upgrade of open.cdash.org.  This should
help index.php and viewTest.php load more quickly.

As always, let us know if you encounter any unexpected behavior while using
CDash.

On Mon, Apr 4, 2016 at 6:49 PM, Zack Galbreath <zack.galbreath at kitware.com>
wrote:

> This upgrade is complete.  I verified that logins, various page loads, and
> submissions are all working correctly, but please let me know if you
> encounter any unexpected behavior.
>
> On Fri, Apr 1, 2016 at 3:14 PM, Zack Galbreath <zack.galbreath at kitware.com
> > wrote:
>
>> I plan to upgrade open.cdash.org this coming Monday, April 4th, at 5pm
>> EDT.  I expect the site to be unavailable for an hour or so while I perform
>> this upgrade.  During this time CDash will not accept any incoming
>> submissions.
>>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://public.kitware.com/pipermail/insight-developers/attachments/20160429/531c843e/attachment.html>

From zack.galbreath at kitware.com  Fri Apr 29 10:04:20 2016
From: zack.galbreath at kitware.com (Zack Galbreath)
Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2016 10:04:20 -0400
Subject: [ITK-dev] [vtk-developers] open.cdash.org upgrade
In-Reply-To: <CALSpCT0k6p3LQO7pf1JHZXZLNVB3Xw-ui8_biZr_cKYdem=cEA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CANgkMA46U2U216ivwaeP5_araEfiFu-YkYdeVVuAbJdm+AM9Sw@mail.gmail.com>
 <CANgkMA7Ywgb2vr8zikVXLBwbunUaBWSWXa7bxuzz=HZa4oZThQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <CANgkMA4CRO=uqHQX69=3W-34=Zst0xPkb8zOrPH2q60qm8Fgtg@mail.gmail.com>
 <CALSpCT0k6p3LQO7pf1JHZXZLNVB3Xw-ui8_biZr_cKYdem=cEA@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CANgkMA460S6D6CjUw45VuY1rj2qgbod+gzB8xWmfHryojq2VAA@mail.gmail.com>

On Fri, Apr 29, 2016 at 9:58 AM, Shawn Waldon <shawn.waldon at kitware.com>
wrote:

> Hi Zach,
>
> Tomviz is getting errors when you try to download the binaries again:
>

Thanks for letting me know.  This is fixed now.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://public.kitware.com/pipermail/insight-developers/attachments/20160429/ad8f8e29/attachment.html>

From matt.mccormick at kitware.com  Fri Apr 29 13:13:06 2016
From: matt.mccormick at kitware.com (Matt McCormick)
Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2016 13:13:06 -0400
Subject: [ITK-dev] Planned Website and Git Repository Downtime: Monday,
	3:30PM
Message-ID: <CALzTN-Rh=f9YCJ6+4AujWiQ6M4EkJ1VHrBrQ62ZLKEbEmZ8NgA@mail.gmail.com>

Hi folks,

We will have brief planned downtime of the landing page and Git repositories on

  Monday, May, 2nd at 3:30PM Eastern Time

HTTPS support will be added to both resources.

Thanks,
Matt

From tj.jackson1226 at gmail.com  Fri Apr 29 14:43:16 2016
From: tj.jackson1226 at gmail.com (Tim Jackson)
Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2016 14:43:16 -0400
Subject: [ITK-dev] problems with programs crashing -- potentially due to
 multiple versions of ITK?
Message-ID: <CAE-Q1Hf4tQRHWN7gj21=oa5R6zmU41FpqTbJcyBOAZBsaNF78w@mail.gmail.com>

Hi all,

I've been making programs that use filters from ITK for a couple years
now.  Recently, I downloaded the newest installation of ITK because I
wanted a version that had the SCIFIO module, in order to read Nikon .nd2
images.

Weird things have now started happening with programs that previously had
no problems.  Everything compiles, but programs linked to one version of
ITK crash every time an image reader updates in Release (but not Debug
mode), and programs linked to another version of ITK can read images
successfully, but inevitably crash when another filter updates (for
example, a registration filter).  These programs all run successfully on
other computers that have only one installation of ITK.

I'm guessing that these programs are having linking problems, but I'm not
really sure how to correct it.  I tried deleting every version of ITK I
have on this computer and downloading a new version and starting from
scratch, but that just made everything worse.

In case this information helps, I used CMake 2.8.10.2 and built everything
with Visual Studios 2012.  My older version of ITK was 4.8.1 and my new
version with the SCIFIO module was 4.9.0.

Thanks for your help,
Tim
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://public.kitware.com/pipermail/insight-developers/attachments/20160429/de3d09fc/attachment.html>

From matt.mccormick at kitware.com  Fri Apr 29 14:49:06 2016
From: matt.mccormick at kitware.com (Matt McCormick)
Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2016 14:49:06 -0400
Subject: [ITK-dev] problems with programs crashing -- potentially due to
 multiple versions of ITK?
In-Reply-To: <CAE-Q1Hf4tQRHWN7gj21=oa5R6zmU41FpqTbJcyBOAZBsaNF78w@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAE-Q1Hf4tQRHWN7gj21=oa5R6zmU41FpqTbJcyBOAZBsaNF78w@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CALzTN-T33Q49jzXu-=+3osb0W+F2JHe5dsWsxiAPksqbise72A@mail.gmail.com>

Hi Tim,

To avoid issues, everything that is linked together should be built
with the same compiler and the same version of ITK.

HTH,
Matt

On Fri, Apr 29, 2016 at 2:43 PM, Tim Jackson <tj.jackson1226 at gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I've been making programs that use filters from ITK for a couple years now.
> Recently, I downloaded the newest installation of ITK because I wanted a
> version that had the SCIFIO module, in order to read Nikon .nd2 images.
>
> Weird things have now started happening with programs that previously had no
> problems.  Everything compiles, but programs linked to one version of ITK
> crash every time an image reader updates in Release (but not Debug mode),
> and programs linked to another version of ITK can read images successfully,
> but inevitably crash when another filter updates (for example, a
> registration filter).  These programs all run successfully on other
> computers that have only one installation of ITK.
>
> I'm guessing that these programs are having linking problems, but I'm not
> really sure how to correct it.  I tried deleting every version of ITK I have
> on this computer and downloading a new version and starting from scratch,
> but that just made everything worse.
>
> In case this information helps, I used CMake 2.8.10.2 and built everything
> with Visual Studios 2012.  My older version of ITK was 4.8.1 and my new
> version with the SCIFIO module was 4.9.0.
>
> Thanks for your help,
> Tim
>
> _______________________________________________
> Powered by www.kitware.com
>
> Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
> http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html
>
> Kitware offers ITK Training Courses, for more information visit:
> http://kitware.com/products/protraining.php
>
> Please keep messages on-topic and check the ITK FAQ at:
> http://www.itk.org/Wiki/ITK_FAQ
>
> Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
> http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/insight-developers
>

From matt.mccormick at kitware.com  Fri Apr 29 15:51:25 2016
From: matt.mccormick at kitware.com (Matt McCormick)
Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2016 15:51:25 -0400
Subject: [ITK-dev] problems with programs crashing -- potentially due to
 multiple versions of ITK?
In-Reply-To: <CAE-Q1HcoeG-xHjV+HgNg_uj0gXQio5S=Syy=oJPLPwJ1Qa5Orw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAE-Q1Hf4tQRHWN7gj21=oa5R6zmU41FpqTbJcyBOAZBsaNF78w@mail.gmail.com>
 <CALzTN-T33Q49jzXu-=+3osb0W+F2JHe5dsWsxiAPksqbise72A@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAE-Q1HcoeG-xHjV+HgNg_uj0gXQio5S=Syy=oJPLPwJ1Qa5Orw@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CALzTN-SaODTXipLrL0wnk9N83iaqv_aw9kz38T2uF4PuScRG_Q@mail.gmail.com>

> Thanks for the quick reply.  I assumed that's what I was doing.  Is it wrong
> to have two versions of ITK with different configurations on one computer,
> use the ITK_DIR variable in CMake to link Program A to one version and
> Program B to another version, and expect them both to run?

It is OK to have two versions of ITK with different configurations, A
and B, if Program A only links to ITK A and Program B only links to
ITK B. If ITK is built with shared libraries, though, and Program B
finds ITK A libraries at runtime, it may crash. To inspect what
libraries an executable is finding at runtime, try Dependency Walker:

  http://www.dependencywalker.com/

HTH,
Matt

On Fri, Apr 29, 2016 at 3:04 PM, Tim Jackson <tj.jackson1226 at gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Matt,
>
> Thanks for the quick reply.  I assumed that's what I was doing.  Is it wrong
> to have two versions of ITK with different configurations on one computer,
> use the ITK_DIR variable in CMake to link Program A to one version and
> Program B to another version, and expect them both to run?
>
> Best,
> Tim
>
> On Fri, Apr 29, 2016 at 2:49 PM, Matt McCormick <matt.mccormick at kitware.com>
> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Tim,
>>
>> To avoid issues, everything that is linked together should be built
>> with the same compiler and the same version of ITK.
>>
>> HTH,
>> Matt
>>
>> On Fri, Apr 29, 2016 at 2:43 PM, Tim Jackson <tj.jackson1226 at gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> > Hi all,
>> >
>> > I've been making programs that use filters from ITK for a couple years
>> > now.
>> > Recently, I downloaded the newest installation of ITK because I wanted a
>> > version that had the SCIFIO module, in order to read Nikon .nd2 images.
>> >
>> > Weird things have now started happening with programs that previously
>> > had no
>> > problems.  Everything compiles, but programs linked to one version of
>> > ITK
>> > crash every time an image reader updates in Release (but not Debug
>> > mode),
>> > and programs linked to another version of ITK can read images
>> > successfully,
>> > but inevitably crash when another filter updates (for example, a
>> > registration filter).  These programs all run successfully on other
>> > computers that have only one installation of ITK.
>> >
>> > I'm guessing that these programs are having linking problems, but I'm
>> > not
>> > really sure how to correct it.  I tried deleting every version of ITK I
>> > have
>> > on this computer and downloading a new version and starting from
>> > scratch,
>> > but that just made everything worse.
>> >
>> > In case this information helps, I used CMake 2.8.10.2 and built
>> > everything
>> > with Visual Studios 2012.  My older version of ITK was 4.8.1 and my new
>> > version with the SCIFIO module was 4.9.0.
>> >
>> > Thanks for your help,
>> > Tim
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > Powered by www.kitware.com
>> >
>> > Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
>> > http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html
>> >
>> > Kitware offers ITK Training Courses, for more information visit:
>> > http://kitware.com/products/protraining.php
>> >
>> > Please keep messages on-topic and check the ITK FAQ at:
>> > http://www.itk.org/Wiki/ITK_FAQ
>> >
>> > Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
>> > http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/insight-developers
>> >
>
>

From dzenanz at gmail.com  Fri Apr 29 16:32:24 2016
From: dzenanz at gmail.com (=?UTF-8?B?RMW+ZW5hbiBadWtpxIc=?=)
Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2016 16:32:24 -0400
Subject: [ITK-dev] problems with programs crashing -- potentially due to
 multiple versions of ITK?
In-Reply-To: <CALzTN-SaODTXipLrL0wnk9N83iaqv_aw9kz38T2uF4PuScRG_Q@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAE-Q1Hf4tQRHWN7gj21=oa5R6zmU41FpqTbJcyBOAZBsaNF78w@mail.gmail.com>
 <CALzTN-T33Q49jzXu-=+3osb0W+F2JHe5dsWsxiAPksqbise72A@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAE-Q1HcoeG-xHjV+HgNg_uj0gXQio5S=Syy=oJPLPwJ1Qa5Orw@mail.gmail.com>
 <CALzTN-SaODTXipLrL0wnk9N83iaqv_aw9kz38T2uF4PuScRG_Q@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CAPf2UMQNua-tyYF0jhUsaV4N4oieL_L4=vHikf7pdEtisWnHow@mail.gmail.com>

Hi Tim,

the classic solution for this is to build ITK (and VTK) as static
libraries. I have a dozen of different ITK versions on my computer and they
coexist nicely.

Regards

On Fri, Apr 29, 2016 at 3:51 PM, Matt McCormick <matt.mccormick at kitware.com>
wrote:

> > Thanks for the quick reply.  I assumed that's what I was doing.  Is it
> wrong
> > to have two versions of ITK with different configurations on one
> computer,
> > use the ITK_DIR variable in CMake to link Program A to one version and
> > Program B to another version, and expect them both to run?
>
> It is OK to have two versions of ITK with different configurations, A
> and B, if Program A only links to ITK A and Program B only links to
> ITK B. If ITK is built with shared libraries, though, and Program B
> finds ITK A libraries at runtime, it may crash. To inspect what
> libraries an executable is finding at runtime, try Dependency Walker:
>
>   http://www.dependencywalker.com/
>
> HTH,
> Matt
>
> On Fri, Apr 29, 2016 at 3:04 PM, Tim Jackson <tj.jackson1226 at gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > Hi Matt,
> >
> > Thanks for the quick reply.  I assumed that's what I was doing.  Is it
> wrong
> > to have two versions of ITK with different configurations on one
> computer,
> > use the ITK_DIR variable in CMake to link Program A to one version and
> > Program B to another version, and expect them both to run?
> >
> > Best,
> > Tim
> >
> > On Fri, Apr 29, 2016 at 2:49 PM, Matt McCormick <
> matt.mccormick at kitware.com>
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi Tim,
> >>
> >> To avoid issues, everything that is linked together should be built
> >> with the same compiler and the same version of ITK.
> >>
> >> HTH,
> >> Matt
> >>
> >> On Fri, Apr 29, 2016 at 2:43 PM, Tim Jackson <tj.jackson1226 at gmail.com>
> >> wrote:
> >> > Hi all,
> >> >
> >> > I've been making programs that use filters from ITK for a couple years
> >> > now.
> >> > Recently, I downloaded the newest installation of ITK because I
> wanted a
> >> > version that had the SCIFIO module, in order to read Nikon .nd2
> images.
> >> >
> >> > Weird things have now started happening with programs that previously
> >> > had no
> >> > problems.  Everything compiles, but programs linked to one version of
> >> > ITK
> >> > crash every time an image reader updates in Release (but not Debug
> >> > mode),
> >> > and programs linked to another version of ITK can read images
> >> > successfully,
> >> > but inevitably crash when another filter updates (for example, a
> >> > registration filter).  These programs all run successfully on other
> >> > computers that have only one installation of ITK.
> >> >
> >> > I'm guessing that these programs are having linking problems, but I'm
> >> > not
> >> > really sure how to correct it.  I tried deleting every version of ITK
> I
> >> > have
> >> > on this computer and downloading a new version and starting from
> >> > scratch,
> >> > but that just made everything worse.
> >> >
> >> > In case this information helps, I used CMake 2.8.10.2 and built
> >> > everything
> >> > with Visual Studios 2012.  My older version of ITK was 4.8.1 and my
> new
> >> > version with the SCIFIO module was 4.9.0.
> >> >
> >> > Thanks for your help,
> >> > Tim
> >> >
> >> > _______________________________________________
> >> > Powered by www.kitware.com
> >> >
> >> > Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
> >> > http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html
> >> >
> >> > Kitware offers ITK Training Courses, for more information visit:
> >> > http://kitware.com/products/protraining.php
> >> >
> >> > Please keep messages on-topic and check the ITK FAQ at:
> >> > http://www.itk.org/Wiki/ITK_FAQ
> >> >
> >> > Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
> >> > http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/insight-developers
> >> >
> >
> >
> _______________________________________________
> Powered by www.kitware.com
>
> Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
> http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html
>
> Kitware offers ITK Training Courses, for more information visit:
> http://kitware.com/products/protraining.php
>
> Please keep messages on-topic and check the ITK FAQ at:
> http://www.itk.org/Wiki/ITK_FAQ
>
> Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
> http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/insight-developers
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://public.kitware.com/pipermail/insight-developers/attachments/20160429/e015ae5e/attachment.html>