[ITK-dev] Review.Source.Kitware.Com -- are strings of dependent topics OK now?

[Marcus D. Hanwell]

On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 12:39 PM, David Cole via Insight-developers
<insight-developers at itk.org> wrote:
>> http://review.source.kitware.com/#/c/16579
>> http://review.source.kitware.com/#/c/16578
>> Incredibly, 16578 and 16579 seem to be circularly dependent.
>
>
> Why do you say they're circularly dependent? It looks to me like 79 is
> based on 78... I'm not seeing the circularity.
>
If you managed a circular dependency I would love to see it - is that
even possible in git?