[ITK-dev] Review.Source.Kitware.Com -- are strings of dependent topics OK now?

[Williams, Norman K]

I’ve been trying to help out with changes related to the HDF5ImageIO, and there’s a string of 4 different patches:

http://review.source.kitware.com/#/c/16579<http://review.source.kitware.com/#/c/16579/>
http://review.source.kitware.com/#/c/16578
http://review.source.kitware.com/#/c/16577
http://review.source.kitware.com/#/c/16576

Incredibly, 16578 and 16579 seem to be circularly dependent.

I’ve just pushed a new version of 16576 which addresses the comments Matt made.  Should those others be abandoned and one free-standing patch be made of the actually substantive changes?



________________________________
Notice: This UI Health Care e-mail (including attachments) is covered by the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. 2510-2521, is confidential and may be legally privileged.  If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any retention, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited.  Please reply to the sender that you have received the message in error, then delete it.  Thank you.
________________________________
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://public.kitware.com/pipermail/insight-developers/attachments/20140903/2429424f/attachment.html>