[Insight-developers] [ITK Community] Remote modules License

[Matt McCormick]

That looks good to me. :-)

On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 5:26 PM, Luke Bloy <luke.bloy at gmail.com> wrote:
> Thanks Matt,
>
> Do people think this license (
> http://www.rad.upenn.edu/sbia/software/license.html ) would have any issues?
> My belief is that it is based strongly off apache 2.
>
> Thanks again.
> Luke
>
>
> On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 12:30 PM, Matt McCormick
> <matt.mccormick at kitware.com> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Luke,
>>
>> There has been considerable work into keeping the repository
>> patent-free and minimize copyleft licenses (see the CMake warning when
>> FFTW support is enabled, which is off by default).
>>
>> The preferred license is Apache 2.0 with copyright assigned to the
>> Insight Software Consortium, like the rest of the toolkit.  Other
>> BSD-style licenses should well work, too.
>>
>> I personally would be fine with most other licenses, too, for a Remote
>> Module, but it also depends on the input of other members of the
>> community.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Matt
>>
>> On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 9:29 PM, Luke Bloy <luke.bloy at gmail.com> wrote:
>> > Are there any license requirements for being considered for inclusion as
>> > a
>> > remote module?
>> >
>> > Luke
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > Powered by www.kitware.com
>> >
>> > Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
>> > http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html
>> >
>> > Kitware offers ITK Training Courses, for more information visit:
>> > http://kitware.com/products/protraining.php
>> >
>> > Please keep messages on-topic and check the ITK FAQ at:
>> > http://www.itk.org/Wiki/ITK_FAQ
>> >
>> > Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
>> > http://www.itk.org/mailman/listinfo/insight-developers
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > Community mailing list
>> > Community at itk.org
>> > http://public.kitware.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/community
>> >
>
>