[Insight-developers] A Contrib group?

Brian Helba brian.helba at kitware.com
Wed Jan 15 13:51:02 EST 2014


Here's an inventory of modules that have EXCLUDE_FROM_DEFAULT in their
module configuration, organized by their group. Note that group membership
is purely a function of directory location, and not something that's
explicitly specified in a CMake file.

Also note that if a module contains an "itk-module-init.cmake" file, then
it is still not enabled even if its respective Group_* option is enabled.
These _should_ be "bridge" modules that require system-installed
third-party libraries [1]. These modules can only be enabled by directly
enabling their respective Module_* option. These are indicated in the list
below with a "*".

Finally, note that while Module_ITKGDCM and Module_ITKOpenJPEG are flagged
as EXCLUDE_FROM_DEFAULT, they are typically enabled as dependencies of
Module_ITKIOGDCM, which is a "default" module.

Group_Bridge
 *Module_ITKVtkGlue
Group_Compatibility
  Module_ITKDeprecated
 *Module_ITKV3Compatibility
Group_IO
 *Module_ITKIODCMTK
 *Module_ITKIOMINC
  Module_ITKIOPhilipsREC
Group_Nonunit
  Module_ITKReview
Group_Segmentation
 *Module_ITKLevelSetsv4Visualization
Group_ThirdParty
 *Module_ITKDCMTK
 *Module_ITKGDCM
  Module_ITKMINC
 Module_ITKOpenJPEG
Group_Video
 *Module_ITKVideoBridgeOpenCV
 *Module_ITKVideoBridgeVXL

Group_Remote (there is no CMake option for this group)
  Module_LesionSizingToolkit
  Module_MGHIO
  Module_SCIFIO
  Module_SmoothingRecursiveYvvGaussianFilter

[1]
http://itk.org/gitweb?p=ITK.git;a=commit;h=8170063fa0832003974f1066313b48016253cae1



On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 9:23 AM, Bradley Lowekamp <blowekamp at mail.nih.gov>wrote:

> Hello,
>
> I would like to propose that we need a Contrib group.
>
> There has been recent push to migrate many contributions into remote
> modules. I believe this is premature.
>
> A remote module is a good solution for medium to large contributions which
> are maintained by contributors. However, the current system does not
> leverage CDash or Gerrit. There is no easy way to review and comment on
> remote module code. Gerrit can not do builds for cross platform testing,
> and the night build systems does not easily test these modules. Yes, the
> module can be enable in certain cases, but this is not a sustainable
> practice.
>
> Also for smaller contribution of just a class or two, the burden of code
> maintenance in increased when compared to just having it in the repository.
>
> I would like to propose that we create a Contrib group, were these
> contributed remote modules and internal modules can exist. The goal here is
> that users can more easily turn on all the contributed modules if needed.
> Also I believe it would be do able to an option to our nightly build
> script, so that after the normal build a separate
> configure/build/test/coverage/submit can be done on the group.
>
> This is my initial thought how how we can improve the current situation
> before it gets too unmanageable.
>
>
> Brad
> _______________________________________________
> Powered by www.kitware.com
>
> Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
> http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html
>
> Kitware offers ITK Training Courses, for more information visit:
> http://kitware.com/products/protraining.php
>
> Please keep messages on-topic and check the ITK FAQ at:
> http://www.itk.org/Wiki/ITK_FAQ
>
> Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
> http://www.itk.org/mailman/listinfo/insight-developers
>



-- 
Brian Helba
Medical Imaging
Kitware, Inc.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.itk.org/pipermail/insight-developers/attachments/20140115/6924cb66/attachment.html>


More information about the Insight-developers mailing list