[Insight-developers] Raising code coverage of LabelMap filters
Bradley Lowekamp
blowekamp at mail.nih.gov
Fri Feb 14 09:03:39 EST 2014
Luis,
In short no reason. The patch should just be taken as a list of 14 tests, which currently are not being run. Arguments need to be determined for them.
If I recall correctly, my first goal was to determine the list of test which were being compiled but not being run. So I commented out all that appears to not be running, and tested. Then as I added tests, I un-commented the test file line. I was stashing and add via a patch, so I clearly made a mistake during the tedious process.
I hope this list is useful.
Brad
On Feb 14, 2014, at 7:32 AM, Luis Ibanez <luis.ibanez at kitware.com> wrote:
> Brad,
>
> Why are you commenting out the .cxx files in lines 42-45 ?
>
> http://review.source.kitware.com/#/c/13646/2/Modules/Filtering/LabelMap/test/CMakeLists.txt
>
> Wouldn't that reduce the code coverage instead of increasing it ?
>
>
> Luis
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.itk.org/pipermail/insight-developers/attachments/20140214/fc6b0e68/attachment.html>
More information about the Insight-developers
mailing list