[Insight-developers] ITK 4.4 release candidate cycles about to begin

[Bradley Lowekamp]

Sean,

You appear to be the only one running them. I agree that it is a waist, and not productive.

We should probably get a system which is compiled in release mode to run them.

Brad

On May 30, 2013, at 10:52 AM, Sean McBride <sean at rogue-research.com> wrote:

> Just wanted to ping this issue.
> 
> Now that we've removed the SSE options from Rogue7, 6 of the 7 remaining test failures are DeformableRegistration timeouts.  1.5 h of timeouts is quite a waste.  :)  Shall I suppress these tests or reduce my value of ITK_COMPUTER_MEMORY_SIZE or...?
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Sean
> 
> 
> On Thu, 9 May 2013 17:16:52 +0000, Johnson, Hans J said:
> 
>> I agree Sean.
>> 
>> The question I have is
>> 
>> 1) is it a defunct test where the test itself is failing
>> 
>> or
>> 
>> 2) an indication that there is a problem in ITK core that the test is
>> exposing.
>> 
>> 
>> If it is of type #1, then I would remove the test and move on.
>> 
>> If it is of type #2, then it should be addressed with code fixes.
>> 
>> Hans
>> 
>> =================================================================
>> Hans J. Johnson, Ph.D.
>> Assistant Professor, Department of Psychiatry
>> 
>> Mailing Address:
>> W274 GH                             Email: hans-johnson at uiowa.edu
>> 200 Hawkins Drive                   Phone: (319) 353 8587
>> The University of Iowa
>> Iowa City, IA 52242
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Sean McBride <sean at rogue-research.com>
>> Organization: Rogue Research Inc.
>> Date: Thursday, May 9, 2013 11:07 AM
>> To: Bradley Lowekamp <blowekamp at mail.nih.gov>
>> Cc: Hans Johnson <hans-johnson at uiowa.edu>, Bill Lorensen
>> <bill.lorensen at gmail.com>, David Cole <dlrdave at aol.com>, ITK
>> <insight-developers at itk.org>
>> Subject: Re: [Insight-developers] ITK 4.4 release candidate cycles about
>> to begin
>> 
>> On Thu, 9 May 2013 09:47:55 -0400, Bradley Lowekamp said:
>> 
>>> As I recall Hans had something to do with adding those lengthy test some
>>> time ago. They were to simulate real world data and registration.
>>> 
>>> It appears that ITK_USE_BRAINWEB_DATA needs to be enable for these tests.
>>> 
>>> Should be still be supporting these tests? If so we are doing a poor job
>>> of it.
>>> 
>>> Sean, If you run the tests without a timeout does is finish?
>> 
>> 1/8 Test #2442: DeformableRegistration8Test5 .....   Passed  1557.03 sec
>> 2/8 Test #2443: DeformableRegistration8Test6 .....   Passed  841.54 sec
>> 
>> Then it started DeformableRegistration8Test7, which consumed about 26 of
>> the machine's 28 GiB of physical memory and I had to manually kill the
>> test.
>> 
>> The value of a test that none of the dashboard machines can get passing is
>> questionable...
> 
>