[Insight-developers] OMG! GDCM is broken again! AddRestriction() doesn't work.

[Williams, Norman K]

Have you logged this as a bug? If you can log a bug and upload some test
data, I can have a look.

For testing purposes, you can just have two slices with two different
seriesUIDs.

http://www.itk.org/Wiki/ITK/Procedure_for_Contributing_Bug_Fixes


I looked at the 3.20.1 itkGDCMSeriesFileNames.cxx versus the current
version, and the only change (besides formatting and comments) is that a
progress reporter was added.

--
Kent Williams norman-k-williams at uiowa.edu






On 8/9/13 7:25 AM, "Constantine Zakkaroff" <mnkz at leeds.ac.uk> wrote:

>Hello ALL.
>
>I'm trying to sub-refine a series based on some DICOM tag like this:
>
>namesGenerator->AddSeriesRestriction("2001|100a");
>namesGenerator->SetInputDirectory(argv[1]);
>const itk::SerieUIDContainer &seriesUIDs =
>namesGenerator->GetSeriesUIDs();
>
>It is based on the DicomSeriesReadImageWrite2.cxx example.
>
>In ITK 4.4.1 this doesn't work. I get only one UID.
>
>The same code compiled against ITK 3.20.1 gives me the number of UIDs
>expected.
>
>Looks like some sort of regression, no?
>
>Regards,
>Constantine
>_______________________________________________
>Powered by www.kitware.com
>
>Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
>http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html
>
>Kitware offers ITK Training Courses, for more information visit:
>http://kitware.com/products/protraining.php
>
>Please keep messages on-topic and check the ITK FAQ at:
>http://www.itk.org/Wiki/ITK_FAQ
>
>Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
>http://www.itk.org/mailman/listinfo/insight-developers



________________________________
Notice: This UI Health Care e-mail (including attachments) is covered by the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. 2510-2521, is confidential and may be legally privileged.  If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any retention, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited.  Please reply to the sender that you have received the message in error, then delete it.  Thank you.
________________________________