[Insight-developers] Slicer4 and ITKv4 packaging
Bill Lorensen
bill.lorensen at gmail.com
Fri Feb 24 23:39:50 EST 2012
Jc,
Thanks. I had tried 1) before without success. After doing 2)
everything installs fine and runs fine.
Thanks again. I'll check in the changes over the weekend.
Bill
On Fri, Feb 24, 2012 at 10:18 PM, Jean-Christophe Fillion-Robin
<jchris.fillionr at kitware.com> wrote:
> Bill,
>
> Please consider the solution I discussed in my previous email and things
> should work better :)
>
> To summarise:
>
> 1) In External_ITKv4.cmake
>
>
> -DITK_INSTALL_INSTALL_LIBRARY_DIR:PATH=${Slicer_INSTALL_LIB_DIR}
> -DITK_INSTALL_INSTALL_ARCHIVE_DIR:PATH=${Slicer_INSTALL_LIB_DIR}
>
> => This is something that should be documented in the migration guide if
> ITKv4.
> The variable ITK_INSTALL_LIB_DIR isn't valid anymore.
>
>
> 2) Around line 9 of CMake/SlicerBlockInstallCMakeProjects.cmake, add the
> following:
>
>
> set(component ALL)
> if(${ITK_VERSION_MAJOR} STREQUAL "3")
> set(component RuntimeLibraries)
> endif()
> set(CPACK_INSTALL_CMAKE_PROJECTS
> "${CPACK_INSTALL_CMAKE_PROJECTS};${ITK_DIR};ITK;${component};/")
>
> Hth
> Jc
>
>
> On Fri, Feb 24, 2012 at 8:23 PM, Bill Lorensen <bill.lorensen at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>>
>> I've have seen the same issues that you see. I have tried specifying
>> -DITK_INSTALL_LIB_DIR:PATH=${Slicer_INSTALL_LIB_DIR}
>> and it does not seem to change anything.
>>
>> What puzzles me is that a make package for ITKv4 (outside of slicer)
>> produces a valid package.
>>
>> Bill
>>
>> On Fri, Feb 24, 2012 at 6:14 PM, Jean-Christophe Fillion-Robin
>> <jchris.fillionr at kitware.com> wrote:
>> > Hi Bill,
>> >
>> > Thanks for working on the ITKv4 integration. I will try to provide
>> > additional details and guidance below.
>> >
>> > Slicer packaging system install its dependent project using cmake by
>> > specifying explicitly which components should be installed in the Slicer
>> > install tree.
>> >
>> > I just run a "make package" in a Slicer-ITKv4 build tree, and I notice
>> > that
>> > only the following libraries are installed:
>> >
>> > libITKDICOMParser-4.1.so
>> > libITKEXPAT-4.1.so
>> > libITKgiftiio-4.1.so
>> > libitkjpeg-4.1.so
>> > libITKMetaIO-4.1.so
>> > libitkNetlibSlatec-4.1.so
>> > libITKniftiio-4.1.so
>> > libITKNrrdIO-4.1.so
>> > libitkopenjpeg-4.1.so
>> > libitkpng-4.1.so
>> > libitktiff-4.1.so
>> > libitkv3p_lsqr-4.1.so
>> > libitkv3p_netlib-4.1.so
>> > libitkvcl-4.1.so
>> > libitkvnl-4.1.so
>> > libitkvnl_algo-4.1.so
>> > libitkzlib-4.1.so
>> > libITKznz-4.1.so
>> >
>> >
>> > 1) There libraries are located in ./lib folder whereas they are expected
>> > in
>> > "./lib/Slicer-4.0". Looking at ITKv3 external project. The option
>> >
>> > -DITK_INSTALL_LIB_DIR:PATH=${Slicer_INSTALL_LIB_DIR}
>> >
>> > is passed.
>> >
>> > See
>> >
>> > https://github.com/Slicer/Slicer/blob/master/SuperBuild/External_ITKv3.cmake#L52
>> >
>> > It means the same thing should probably be done for ITKv4 external
>> > project.
>> >
>> > Looking at the CMakeLists.txt, there is indeed a variables named
>> > ITK_INSTALL_LIBRARY_DIR, ITK_INSTALL_ARCHIVE_DIR, ...
>> > See
>> >
>> > http://itk.org/gitweb?p=ITK.git;a=blob;f=CMakeLists.txt;h=d9ac50f81439c17f490d1cd8fb00f07afc861015;hb=HEAD#l50
>> >
>> > In the case of ITKv4, we should probably set the following:
>> >
>> > -DITK_INSTALL_INSTALL_LIBRARY_DIR:PATH=${Slicer_INSTALL_LIB_DIR}
>> >
>> > -DITK_INSTALL_INSTALL_ARCHIVE_DIR:PATH=${Slicer_INSTALL_LIB_DIR}
>> >
>> > => This is something that should be documented in the migration guide if
>> > ITKv4.
>> > The variable ITK_INSTALL_LIB_DIR isn't valid anymore.
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > 2) The question regarding the components.
>> >
>> > Within ITKv4 source code, the "itk_module_target_install" macro seems to
>> > responsible of installing the target.
>> >
>> > Seems no Component is specified in the install rule. It means it's not
>> > possible to do a component based installation :( . It means that when
>> > ITKv4
>> > is packaged by an other project all the headers, doc, etc ... will be
>> > installed even if not needed. This something we would like to avoid in
>> > Slicer.
>> >
>> > See
>> >
>> > http://itk.org/gitweb?p=ITK.git;a=blob;f=CMake/ITKModuleMacros.cmake;h=b9458d73e2f2df2bf85220da7ad09d2934d78be5;hb=HEAD#l194
>> >
>> >
>> > Within ITKv3, a component was specified.
>> >
>> > IF(NOT ITK_INSTALL_NO_LIBRARIES)
>> > INSTALL(TARGETS ITKCommon itkvnl_inst
>> > RUNTIME DESTINATION ${ITK_INSTALL_BIN_DIR_CM24} COMPONENT
>> > RuntimeLibraries
>> > LIBRARY DESTINATION ${ITK_INSTALL_LIB_DIR_CM24} COMPONENT
>> > RuntimeLibraries
>> > ARCHIVE DESTINATION ${ITK_INSTALL_LIB_DIR_CM24} COMPONENT
>> > Development)
>> > ENDIF(NOT ITK_INSTALL_NO_LIBRARIES)
>> >
>> >
>> > See
>> >
>> > http://itk.org/gitweb?p=ITK.git;a=blob;f=Code/Common/CMakeLists.txt;h=55749ea90e6d8d253d882b5a9cf7524cd92bcf7c;hb=389c62087f77cf116cf53039f4d667a544c824bc#l168
>> >
>> > The workaround the component issue would be to add the following line in
>> >
>> > https://github.com/Slicer/Slicer/blob/master/CMake/SlicerBlockInstallCMakeProjects.cmake#L9
>> >
>> > // --------------
>> > set(component ALL)
>> > if(${ITK_VERSION_MAJOR} STREQUAL "3")
>> > set(component RuntimeLibraries)
>> > endif()
>> > set(CPACK_INSTALL_CMAKE_PROJECTS
>> > "${CPACK_INSTALL_CMAKE_PROJECTS};${ITK_DIR};ITK;${component};/")
>> > // --------------
>> >
>> >
>> > After applying this two fixes, let me know how it goes.
>> > Thanks
>> > Jc
>> >
>> >
>> > Ps: Documentation about CPACK_INSTALL_CMAKE_PROJECTS is here:
>> > http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake:CPackConfiguration
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > On Fri, Feb 24, 2012 at 4:56 PM, Bill Lorensen <bill.lorensen at gmail.com>
>> > wrote:
>> >>
>> >> Jc,
>> >>
>> >> Please consider me a newbie regarding packaging. And, I have not
>> >> read/analyzed your e-mail. ITKv4, make package, creates a valid and
>> >> usable package. Why is that not sufficient for Slicer4?
>> >>
>> >> Bill
>> >>
>> >> On Fri, Feb 24, 2012 at 4:42 PM, Jean-Christophe Fillion-Robin
>> >> <jchris.fillionr at kitware.com> wrote:
>> >> > Hi Bill,
>> >> >
>> >> > Are you packaging on linux or mac ?
>> >> >
>> >> > //-----------------------------------
>> >> > Linux / Windows:
>> >> >
>> >> > Within Slicer, ITK is told to installed itself in the file
>> >> > SlicerBlockInstallCMakeProject
>> >> > s.cmake
>> >> >
>> >> > See
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > https://github.com/Slicer/Slicer/blob/master/CMake/SlicerBlockInstallCMakeProjects.cmake#L9
>> >> >
>> >> > You can see that the current system expects the ITK libraries to be
>> >> > associated with the RuntimeLibraries component.
>> >> >
>> >> > => Is it still the case with ITKv4 ?
>> >> >
>> >> > This file is itself included from here:
>> >> >
>> >> > https://github.com/Slicer/Slicer/blob/master/CMake/SlicerCPack.cmake#L32
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > //-----------------------------------
>> >> > MacOSX:
>> >> >
>> >> > The fixup bundle mechanism expects the libraries to exist in
>> >> > ITK_LIBRARY_DIRS
>> >> > See
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > https://github.com/Slicer/Slicer/blob/master/Utilities/LastConfigureStep/SlicerCompleteBundles.cmake.in#L201
>> >> >
>> >> > Is ITK_LIBRARY_DIRS properly set with ITKConfig.cmake ?
>> >> >
>> >> > Hth
>> >> > Jc
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > On Fri, Feb 24, 2012 at 4:11 PM, Bill Lorensen
>> >> > <bill.lorensen at gmail.com>
>> >> > wrote:
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Folks,
>> >> >>
>> >> >> I'm trying to package Slicer4 with ITKv4.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> 1) for ITKv4, make package produces a proper tarball that I can
>> >> >> untar
>> >> >> and
>> >> >> use.
>> >> >> 2) for Sllicer4, make package does not contain the ITKv4 includes.
>> >> >> Also, the package contains ITKv4's ThirdParty libraries, but none of
>> >> >> the other ITK libraries.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> So, is there some special requirement in Slicer4 that must be
>> >> >> present
>> >> >> to achieve a proper package?
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Bill
>> >> >> _______________________________________________
>> >> >> Powered by www.kitware.com
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
>> >> >> http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Kitware offers ITK Training Courses, for more information visit:
>> >> >> http://kitware.com/products/protraining.html
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Please keep messages on-topic and check the ITK FAQ at:
>> >> >> http://www.itk.org/Wiki/ITK_FAQ
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
>> >> >> http://www.itk.org/mailman/listinfo/insight-developers
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > --
>> >> > +1 919 869 8849
>> >> >
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> --
>> >> Unpaid intern in BillsBasement at noware dot com
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> > +1 919 869 8849
>> >
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Unpaid intern in BillsBasement at noware dot com
>
>
>
>
> --
> +1 919 869 8849
>
--
Unpaid intern in BillsBasement at noware dot com
More information about the Insight-developers
mailing list