[Insight-developers] Comments and questions on Morphology Filters

Gaëtan Lehmann gaetan.lehmann at jouy.inra.fr
Wed Mar 23 17:08:18 EDT 2011


Le 23 mars 11 à 16:28, Bradley Lowekamp a écrit :

> Gaetan,
>

Hi Brad,

> After integrating and testing some morphology filters for SimpleITK.  
> I had some questions, and wondering if you had any experience.
>
> The ErodeObjectMorhpologyImageFilter and the  
> DialateObjectMorphologyImageFilter, seem to be redundant with  
> BinaryErodeImageFilter and BinaryDilateImageFilter, when the  
> SetErodeValue, SetDilateValue are respectfully set. Do you agree  
> with this, or is the subtly in the methods I am missing?
>

I never really understood what those filters are for.
We'll have to review them I guess I'll have to look at them more  
closely soon.

> Also do you have any experience with BinaryThinningImageFilter and  
> BinaryPruningImageFilter? They both seem to only correctly operate  
> in 2D and the pruning algotihm did not perform as I expects.  
> Additionally, their testing in ITK is rather poor.

I never used those filters because they are restricted to 2D.

Gaëtan



-- 
Gaëtan Lehmann
Biologie du Développement et de la Reproduction
INRA de Jouy-en-Josas (France)
tel: +33 1 34 65 29 66    fax: 01 34 65 29 09
http://voxel.jouy.inra.fr  http://www.itk.org
http://www.mandriva.org  http://www.bepo.fr

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: PGP.sig
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 203 bytes
Desc: Ceci est une signature ?lectronique PGP
URL: <http://www.itk.org/mailman/private/insight-developers/attachments/20110323/df4501c2/attachment.pgp>


More information about the Insight-developers mailing list