[Insight-developers] When will ITK w/Modularization be usable?

[Arnaud GELAS]

Brad,

We also use ITK4 to build our application, and (critical) commits have 
been merged this week, after v4.0a05 was tagged. It would be really nice 
if there was an additional tag added just before the modularization.

Would it be possible to create such an additional tag?

I guess it would help project like Kent's or ours, during the transition.

Arnaud

On 03/10/2011 03:18 PM, Bradley Lowekamp wrote:
> Kent,
>
> You have been building your project off the nightly builds each night?
>
> I have suggested to a few that it may be best to just build other 
> projects off the tagged alpha releases, as they are more "stable", 
> mark good points and milestones. Would that work for you project? The 
> v4.0a05 was just done over the weekend. As I can not continuously 
> migrate my own projects to the latest nightly, the alpha releases have 
> been when I have made the needed updates.
>
> Brad
>
> On Mar 10, 2011, at 2:36 PM, Williams, Norman K wrote:
>
>> We're in a less than satisfactory position right now with respect to 
>> ITK4.
>> We had been building a large suite of programs (the various BRAINS
>> packages on NITRC) against ITK4.
>>
>> Now, with the modularization changes, we can no longer do that, because
>> the new tree doesn't install -- it doesn't have an ITKConfig.cmake.
>>
>> I'm not complaining. Well I am but I'm not whining. I know that there are
>> positive things about the modularization, and that a little interim pain
>> is necessary.  And as much as I can I'll try and report problems and fix
>> them if I can.
>>
>> But is there a timeframe for having things in 'apple pie order' enough to
>> resume building with ITK4?
>>
>> --
>> Kent Williams norman-k-williams at uiowa.edu 
>> <mailto:norman-k-williams at uiowa.edu>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ________________________________
>> Notice: This UI Health Care e-mail (including attachments) is covered 
>> by the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. 2510-2521, is 
>> confidential and may be legally privileged.  If you are not the 
>> intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any retention, 
>> dissemination, distribution, or copying of this communication is 
>> strictly prohibited.  Please reply to the sender that you have 
>> received the message in error, then delete it.  Thank you.
>> ________________________________
>> _______________________________________________
>> Powered by www.kitware.com <http://www.kitware.com>
>>
>> Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
>> http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html
>>
>> Kitware offers ITK Training Courses, for more information visit:
>> http://kitware.com/products/protraining.html
>>
>> Please keep messages on-topic and check the ITK FAQ at:
>> http://www.itk.org/Wiki/ITK_FAQ
>>
>> Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
>> http://www.itk.org/mailman/listinfo/insight-developers
>
> ========================================================
>
> Bradley Lowekamp
>
> Lockheed Martin Contractor for
>
> Office of High Performance Computing and Communications
>
> National Library of Medicine
>
> blowekamp at mail.nih.gov <mailto:blowekamp at mail.nih.gov>
>
>
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.itk.org/mailman/private/insight-developers/attachments/20110310/1a71192d/attachment.htm>