[Insight-developers] SimpleITK ARB Examples

[Alexandre GOUAILLARD]

hi dan,

thanks for the answer.

> Now, rather than the user needing to know about 50+ classes, they only
> need to know about 7. IMHO such "simple" wrappers may help hide some
> of the perceived complexity of ITK. SimpleITK would then wrap this new
> layer of abstraction, rather than the raw power that WrapITK deals
> with.

I totally vote for that.

Still, instantiation and wrapping (C++ to java/C#/python) mechanisms
are common problems to both approach and we might want to address
those two problems all together.

regards,

alex.

>
> Hope this clears up my intention.
>
> Regards, Dan
>
> On 7 September 2010 16:20, Alexandre GOUAILLARD <agouaillard at gmail.com> wrote:
>> hi guys,
>>
>> I also think that pointed out examples help grasp the concept more
>> precisly and is a very good idea.
>>
>> Now, it looks to me that 3 possible implementations are illustrated,
>> and I fail to see the difference between the latest one (with the
>> finest granularity) and the current implementation using wrapITK. If
>> you don't provide a simple (fonctionnal, matlab-like) layer, and
>> provide a class granularity, with manual instanciation for a given set
>> a types, then, a solution exists, right?
>>
>> What am I missing?
>>
>> alex.
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Sep 7, 2010 at 9:22 PM, Gabe Hart <gabe.hart at kitware.com> wrote:
>>> This looks great.  I think it makes a lot of sense at this phase to focus on
>>> end user examples rather than putting too much time into complex sample
>>> implementations since there are numerous different design possibilities that
>>> could take a lot of time to code up and ultimately end up being discarded.
>>>
>>> One further thought I have for the collection of examples on the wiki is to
>>> include a few notes about each one that highlight the pros and cons of the
>>> given approach.  For example, maintaining the pipeline structure will allow
>>> for a much easier implementation of streaming which may not be immediately
>>> obvious to a potential user scanning the example.
>>>
>>> Also, it looks like there has been a stand alone page made for the examples
>>> at:
>>> http://www.itk.org/Wiki/ITK_Release_4/SimpleITK/Advisory_Review_Board/Prototype_Code_Discussions
>>>
>>> -Gabe
>>>
>>> On 09/03/2010 04:07 AM, Dan Mueller wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hi all,
>>>>
>>>> I have some other ideas regarding registration. Unfortunately it is
>>>> difficult for me to attend t-cons to share these ideas. I have not yet
>>>> finished the example implementation, so I have added the expected
>>>> end-user example to the wiki page.
>>>>
>>>>  http://www.itk.org/Wiki/ITK_Release_4/SimpleITK/Advisory_Review_Board#Enum_approach
>>>>
>>>> Regards, Dan (Mueller)
>>>>
>>>> On 2 September 2010 22:55, Gabe Hart<gabe.hart at kitware.com>  wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>>
>>>>> First off, sorry to have missed the tcon on Tuesday.  It sounds like some
>>>>> important decisions were made, particularly the formation of an advisory
>>>>> review board for SimpleITK.  I talked to Luis today who suggested that in
>>>>> order to move forward with the ARB, we needed some concrete examples to
>>>>> show
>>>>> the reviewers for the different possible designs of SimpleITK.  In that
>>>>> vein, I set up a section of the Wiki to collect these examples.
>>>>>
>>>>> http://www.itk.org/Wiki/ITK_Release_4/SimpleITK/Advisory_Review_Board
>>>>>
>>>>> I've added a few examples for the gaussian filter and registration use
>>>>> cases.  I think the registration case needs some more examples that
>>>>> demonstrate the possible range of flexibility for SimpleITK's
>>>>> registration
>>>>> framework (adjust the transform type, adjust the optimizer, etc...).
>>>>>
>>>>> Feel free to add new examples or edit the existing ones.  Hopefully we
>>>>> can
>>>>> get this to cover the full range of possible user interface paradigms.
>>>>>
>>>>> -Gabe
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Powered by www.kitware.com
>>>
>>> Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
>>> http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html
>>>
>>> Kitware offers ITK Training Courses, for more information visit:
>>> http://kitware.com/products/protraining.html
>>>
>>> Please keep messages on-topic and check the ITK FAQ at:
>>> http://www.itk.org/Wiki/ITK_FAQ
>>>
>>> Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
>>> http://www.itk.org/mailman/listinfo/insight-developers
>>>
>>
>