[Insight-developers] ITK wrapping status

[Gaëtan Lehmann]

Le 14 oct. 10 à 20:17, kent williams a écrit :

> So you're completely dropping TCL support?  That's what Hans  
> indicated, but
> it looks now like it's in the supported-sort-of-but-not-maintained  
> category.
> One of my jobs in the next year is going to be porting thousands of  
> lines of
> Tcl to Python for this reason?
>

Hi,

Wrappers are not to be broken in several places for Tcl, some of them  
reported by you.
Our plan is to not invest time in fixing non obvious bugs in Tcl. If  
someone eles wants to provide fixes, Tcl will stay there as a usable  
but non officially supported target language.

If nobody provides bug fixes it will at least be hidden in the  
advanced options, but more likely fully removed.

Regards,

Gaëtan


>
> On 10/14/10 12:15 PM, "Gaëtan Lehmann" <gaetan.lehmann at jouy.inra.fr>  
> wrote:
>
>>
>> Hi Michal,
>>
>> ITK 4.0 wrappers will be based on the last version of WrapITK, which
>> is currently available in a separate project hosted by googlecode.
>>
>>   http://wrapitk.googlecode.com
>>
>> The last version in trunk is nightly tested for python and java
>> against the last ITK version from ITK's repository.
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Gaëtan
>>
>>
>> Le 14 oct. 10 à 18:50, Michal Suchanek a écrit :
>>
>>> Hello
>>>
>>> I would like to ask what is the status of ITK wrappings,
>>> specifically for Java.
>>>
>>> The insight toolkit 3.18 which is in Debian does not have working
>>> wrappings because the wrappings miscompile with gcc currently  
>>> present
>>> in Debian which is 4.4.
>>>
>>> This is reported in Mantis as issue 11129 which is still open.
>>>
>>> The workaround would be to rebuild the package with gcc 4.3 which is
>>> in Debian stable soon to become oldstable.
>>>
>>> I read about some plan to replace the CSwig wrappings with something
>>> different in ITK 4.0 but currently the build happily configures with
>>> the packaging scripts for 3.18 which configure for CSwig wrapping.
>>>
>>> Unsurprisingly ITK 4 does not build for me but that is a different
>>> issue.
>>>
>>> I don't have much code to port yet so I don't mind going with ITK  
>>> 4 so
>>> long it works, especially since the wrappings are supposed to be  
>>> more
>>> complete and thus I would not have to recompile ITK to wrap the
>>> methods I use.
>>>
>>> Thanks
>>>
>>> Michal
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Powered by www.kitware.com
>>>
>>> Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
>>> http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html
>>>
>>> Kitware offers ITK Training Courses, for more information visit:
>>> http://kitware.com/products/protraining.html
>>>
>>> Please keep messages on-topic and check the ITK FAQ at:
>>> http://www.itk.org/Wiki/ITK_FAQ
>>>
>>> Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
>>> http://www.itk.org/mailman/listinfo/insight-developers
>
> _______________________________________________
> Powered by www.kitware.com
>
> Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
> http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html
>
> Kitware offers ITK Training Courses, for more information visit:
> http://kitware.com/products/protraining.html
>
> Please keep messages on-topic and check the ITK FAQ at:
> http://www.itk.org/Wiki/ITK_FAQ
>
> Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
> http://www.itk.org/mailman/listinfo/insight-developers

-- 
Gaëtan Lehmann
Biologie du Développement et de la Reproduction
INRA de Jouy-en-Josas (France)
tel: +33 1 34 65 29 66    fax: 01 34 65 29 09
http://voxel.jouy.inra.fr  http://www.itk.org
http://www.mandriva.org  http://www.bepo.fr

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: PGP.sig
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 203 bytes
Desc: Ceci est une signature ?lectronique PGP
URL: <http://www.itk.org/mailman/private/insight-developers/attachments/20101015/1777c84b/attachment-0001.pgp>