[Insight-developers] Proposal: refactoring of image class hierarchy in ITK v4

[Bill Lorensen]

Dan,

I agree we need to address the image import issue.

Maybe for some image organizations, it could still be available. Some
sort of a trait that could be checked?

Bill

On Tue, Oct 5, 2010 at 4:53 PM, Daniel Blezek <Blezek.Daniel at mayo.edu> wrote:
> Won't removing GetBufferPointer() make it much more difficult to interface
> with VTK and other external systems?  I'd hate to have to make a copy of my
> images every time I go in and out of ITK...
>
>
> On 10/5/10 3:43 PM, "Bill Lorensen" <bill.lorensen at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Dan,
>>
>> Jim Miller, the architect of the itkImage classes admits that exposing
>> GetBufferPointer() was a mistake. This can be corrected in itkV4.
>>
>> Bill
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Oct 5, 2010 at 4:14 PM, Dan Mueller <dan.muel at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Hi Cory,
>>>
>>> Not sure if the community wants to include/refactor the image classes
>>> proposed here
>>>    http://www.insight-journal.org/browse/publication/646
>>> namely
>>>    SliceContinguousImage
>>>    SingleBitBinaryImage
>>> which would derive from RegularImageBase in your proposed hierarchy.
>>>
>>> You have done a comprehensive analysis of where spacing is used; the
>>> addition of the above classes would also require an analysis of the
>>> use of GetBufferPointer(), which will not fall out as easy as
>>> spacing...
>>>
>>> Cheers, Dan
>>>
>>> On 5 October 2010 18:12, Cory Quammen <cquammen at cs.unc.edu> wrote:
>>>> Dear all,
>>>>
>>>> I've drafted a proposal for refactoring the image class hierarchy in
>>>> ITK v4, which can be found here:
>>>>
>>>> http://www.itk.org/Wiki/ITK_Release_4/Image_Class_Hierarchy_Refactoring
>>>>
>>>> Please feel free to modify the wiki page to address things I've
>>>> overlooked, suggest nomenclature improvements, or correct things I
>>>> have gotten wrong.
>>>>
>>>> Thank you,
>>>> Cory
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Cory Quammen
>>>> Computer Integrated Systems for Microscopy and Manipulation (CISMM)
>>>> Department of Computer Science
>>>> University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
>>>> http://www.cs.unc.edu/~cquammen
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Powered by www.kitware.com
>>>>
>>>> Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
>>>> http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html
>>>>
>>>> Kitware offers ITK Training Courses, for more information visit:
>>>> http://kitware.com/products/protraining.html
>>>>
>>>> Please keep messages on-topic and check the ITK FAQ at:
>>>> http://www.itk.org/Wiki/ITK_FAQ
>>>>
>>>> Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
>>>> http://www.itk.org/mailman/listinfo/insight-developers
>>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Powered by www.kitware.com
>>>
>>> Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
>>> http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html
>>>
>>> Kitware offers ITK Training Courses, for more information visit:
>>> http://kitware.com/products/protraining.html
>>>
>>> Please keep messages on-topic and check the ITK FAQ at:
>>> http://www.itk.org/Wiki/ITK_FAQ
>>>
>>> Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
>>> http://www.itk.org/mailman/listinfo/insight-developers
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Powered by www.kitware.com
>>
>> Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
>> http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html
>>
>> Kitware offers ITK Training Courses, for more information visit:
>> http://kitware.com/products/protraining.html
>>
>> Please keep messages on-topic and check the ITK FAQ at:
>> http://www.itk.org/Wiki/ITK_FAQ
>>
>> Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
>> http://www.itk.org/mailman/listinfo/insight-developers
>
> --
> Daniel Blezek, PhD
> Medical Imaging Informatics Innovation Center
>
> P 127 or (77) 8 8886
> T 507 538 8886
> E blezek.daniel at mayo.edu
>
> Mayo Clinic
> 200 First St. S.W.
> Harwick SL-44
> Rochester, MN 55905
> mayoclinic.org
> "It is more complicated than you think." -- RFC 1925
>
>