[Insight-developers] OPEN ACCESS: If you are an ACM member, it is time to vote for open access

Luis Ibanez luis.ibanez at kitware.com
Sun May 9 23:03:47 EDT 2010


http://www.realtimerendering.com/blog/acm-and-siggraph-members-vote-for-open-access/


ACM and SIGGRAPH Members – Vote for Open Access!

May 9, 2010

Long-time readers of this blog will be well aware of my position on
ACM and Open Access. Although ACM is a non-profit organization which
ostensibly has as its only mandate “the advancement of computing as a
science and a profession”, the ACM Publications Board has been
behaving like a rent-seeking publisher; bullying students working to
provide valuable resources to the community, and lobbying the US
Government against Open Access initiatives, all in the name of
protecting their revenue streams.

I have witnessed an outpouring of anger from the computing community
at these events, convincing me that I am not alone in believing that
the ACM Publications Board (and by extension the ACM itself) has
tragically lost its way, prioritizing its income over the good of
computing as a science and a profession. In fighting Open Access they
are on the wrong side of history; witness all the leading academic
institutions who have come out in favor of the very government Open
Access initiative which the ACM has opposed.

If you believe as I do, then now is the chance to make a difference!
SIGGRAPH is holding elections now for three Director-at-Large
positions, to be selected from five candidates; the deadline for the
elections is June 4th. If you are an active SIGGRAPH member, you
should have received instructions for voting by now; you can vote at
this link. ACM is also holding general elections for various Council
positions, including the President of the ACM; you can vote at this
link.

For me, Open Access is the most important issue in these elections.
But which candidates will fight for Open Access, and which for the
status quo? Of all the SIGGRAPH candidates, only one has explicitly
mentioned Open Access in their position statement (James O’Brien, as
Eric pointed out in a recent post), and so far one of the ACM Council
candidates have: Salil Vadhan’s statment is here:
http://www.acm.org/acmelections/candidate10.

To arm voting ACM and SIGGRAPH members with information on the
candidates positions, I have composed some questions regarding ACM’s
copyright policy and Open Access, and put them up on a web page. I
have sent these questions to all the candidates for these elections
(except for the few which I have so far been unable to contact), and
am posting the answers on the web page as they come in.

So far only two candidates for the SIGGRAPH election have answered;
Mashhuda Glencross and James O’Brien. Both answers are Open-Access
friendly. No candidates for the ACM Council have come forward yet.
Keep following the questions web page, and make sure to use the
information there to select candidates, and vote in both elections.
Nothing will ever change unless we make our voices heard!

http://www.realtimerendering.com/blog/acm-and-siggraph-members-vote-for-open-access/


More information about the Insight-developers mailing list