[Insight-developers] Casting constructors for DTI and Sym Mat pixeltypes

Karthik Krishnan karthik.krishnan at kitware.com
Mon Mar 22 01:22:49 EDT 2010 

A quick sanity check would be compare this class with itk::Vector .
Both derive from itk::FixedArray and the templated methods added
should look identical.

thanks

On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 8:47 AM, Luke Bloy <luke.bloy at gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Luis,
>
> Thanks for looking into it.
>
> I committed some changes yesterday that I think should solve the VS6.0
> problem. However the SunOS-CC-5.6 is still having problems.
>
>
> -Luke
>
> Luis Ibanez wrote:
>>
>> Hi Luke,
>>
>> Thanks for keeping an eye on the Dashboard.
>>
>> I'll catch up with these two compilers tomorrow.
>>
>> Given that similar code is working for the FixedArray,
>> we should be able to find a combination for the
>> tensors classes as well.
>>
>>
>>    Luis
>>
>>
>>
>> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 8:28 AM, Luke Bloy <luke.bloy at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> Hi Luis,
>>>
>>> It seems like SunOS-CC-5.6
>>> <http://www.cdash.org/CDash/buildSummary.php?buildid=564217> also isn't
>>> happy with the code i submitted.
>>>
>>> http://www.cdash.org/CDash/viewBuildError.php?buildid=564217
>>>
>>> Unfortunatly, i don't have access to that compiler either.
>>>
>>> -Luke
>>>
>>> Luis Ibanez wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Hi Luke,
>>>>
>>>> What is structurally different between the new code added to the
>>>> itkSymmetricSecondRankTensor and the templated constructors
>>>> that Karthik pointed out that we already have in itkFixedArray ?
>>>>
>>>> That difference may provide a hint on what must be modified in
>>>> order to induce happiness in the Visual Studio 6.0 build....
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>    Luis
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 7:47 PM, Luke Bloy <luke.bloy at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Luis,
>>>>>
>>>>> I do not have access to that compiler but i suspect the problem is that
>>>>> I
>>>>> neglected to remove the non-templated constructor and assignment
>>>>> operators.
>>>>>
>>>>> I have just removed those methods and am running tests on my gcc box.
>>>>>
>>>>> I can either commit the changes or if you prefer we can wait until
>>>>> someone
>>>>> with a vs 6 box can test the patch.
>>>>>
>>>>> Sorry for the inconvenience.
>>>>>
>>>>> Luke
>>>>>
>>>>> Luis Ibanez wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi Luke,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The new code is failing in Visual Studio 6.0:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> http://www.cdash.org/CDash/viewBuildError.php?buildid=563721
>>>>>>
>>>>>> C:\Dashboards\My
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Tests\InsightContinuous\Code\Common\itkSymmetricSecondRankTensor.h(119)
>>>>>> : fatal error C1001: INTERNAL COMPILER ERROR
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Do you have access to this compiler ?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>  Please let us know,
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>     Thanks
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>            Luis
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --------------------------------------------
>>>>>> On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 4:00 PM, Luke Bloy <luke.bloy at gmail.com>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Luis,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The build was green, So I have just committed the patch. I'll keep my
>>>>>>> eye
>>>>>>> on
>>>>>>> the continuous builds and the nightlies in the morning.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thanks for the help.
>>>>>>> -Luke
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Luis Ibanez wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Hi Luke,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Thanks a lot for implementing the changes
>>>>>>>> and preparing the patch.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I tried to run it on my side,
>>>>>>>> but the following file is missing:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> itkNumericTraitsDiffusionTensor3DPixel.cxx
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Could you please send this file ?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> ---
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> The additional tests look reasonable.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> A good reference to have is to monitor the code coverage
>>>>>>>> of the classes today, and verify that they have the same
>>>>>>>> (or larger code) coverage tomorrow.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> To be more specific, we have today:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> itkSymmetricSecondRankTensor.txx : 98.80%
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> http://www.cdash.org/CDash/viewCoverageFile.php?buildid=563343&fileid=10858202
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> itkSymmetricSecondRankTensor.h : 100%
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> http://www.cdash.org/CDash/viewCoverageFile.php?buildid=563343&fileid=10858201
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> itkDiffusionTensor3D:   98.11%
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> http://www.cdash.org/CDash/viewCoverageFile.php?buildid=563343&fileid=10857778
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> ----
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> If your Experimental build turns out to be green,
>>>>>>>> please go ahead and commit the patch.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Then,
>>>>>>>> we should keep an eye on the continuous
>>>>>>>> builds for the rest of the day.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>  Thanks
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>        Luis
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> --------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>>>> On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 1:15 PM, Luke Bloy <luke.bloy at gmail.com>
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Hi Luis,
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I'm attaching a patch that contains the the constructors as well as
>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>> NumericTraits for DiffusionTensor3D pixeltypes.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Please let me know if the added tests are sufficient.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I'm running an Experimental build now If it is green should i
>>>>>>>>> commit
>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>> changes?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> -Luke
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Luis Ibanez wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Hi Karthik,
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Thanks for pointing this out.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> You are right,
>>>>>>>>>> the FixedArray already provide a templated  implementation
>>>>>>>>>> of the operator=() as well as the casting constructor.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Luke:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Would you like to give it a shot at implementing these
>>>>>>>>>> methods in the itkSymmetricSecondRankTensor ?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> You may want to follow the example of
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> itkFixedArray.h lines:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>   145-155 :  Constructor with casting
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>   171-183 :  operator=  with casting
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> The corresponding tests for these methods should
>>>>>>>>>> be added to the file:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>  Insight/Testing/Code/Common/
>>>>>>>>>>         itkSymmetricSecondRankTensorTest.cxx
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Please let us know if you run into any problem.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> It will be nice if you could start trying this code soon,
>>>>>>>>>> as we may move into cutting the ITK 3.18 release
>>>>>>>>>> as soon as we sort out the licensing issues of the
>>>>>>>>>> numerical libraries.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>  Thanks
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>       Luis
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> --------------------------------------
>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 2:26 AM, Karthik Krishnan
>>>>>>>>>> <karthik.krishnan at kitware.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> For FixedArray, Vector, RGBPixel classes, we've already templated
>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>> operator= and constructor classes to provide implicit casting
>>>>>>>>>>> operations and they seem to work well.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks
>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>> karthik
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Mar 15, 2010 at 4:43 PM, Luis Ibanez
>>>>>>>>>>> <luis.ibanez at kitware.com>
>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Brad,
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> I can't think of a drawback for the explicit constructors
>>>>>>>>>>>> right now,...  (but I may just be low in coffee).     :-/
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> I worry about the "invisibility" of these methods, and how
>>>>>>>>>>>> easy it is to add them, and how hard it will be to remove
>>>>>>>>>>>> them if something goes wrong with them.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> I still would vote for the "CastFrom()" methods, but if
>>>>>>>>>>>> enough developers are happy with explicit constructors
>>>>>>>>>>>> and are willing to help with the maintenance of the code
>>>>>>>>>>>> for the next decade, then I'm happy to follow the crowd.   :-)
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>  Luis
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Mar 15, 2010 at 4:03 PM, Bradley Lowekamp
>>>>>>>>>>>> <blowekamp at mail.nih.gov> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello Luis,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks for the info regarding the itk::Array, I forgot the
>>>>>>>>>>>>> usefulness
>>>>>>>>>>>>> of all the inherited methods!
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> In regards to this, what is the down side to using an explicit
>>>>>>>>>>>>> constructor? For example:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> explicit
>>>>>>>>>>>>> template<TOtherValueType>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> SymmetricSecondRankTensor( const
>>>>>>>>>>>>> SymmetricSecondRankTensor<TOtherValueType> &);
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> This uses standard conventions along with requiring the
>>>>>>>>>>>>> contractor/conversion to be explicitly defined?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Making the following valid code:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Float3DTensorType floatTensor2(intTensor);
>>>>>>>>>>>>> floatTensor2 = Float3DTensorType(intTensor);
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> But not:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> floatTensor2 = intTensor;
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Just a thought on an alternative approach....
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Brad
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> p.s.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> This is my understanding of C++, compilers and standards may
>>>>>>>>>>>>> differ
>>>>>>>>>>>>> :)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mar 15, 2010, at 3:45 PM, Luis Ibanez wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Luke,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Historically we have been cautious when adding implicit
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> conversions, since once that syntactic sugar is introduced
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in the code, it is very easy to get unintended consequences
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> particularly when using templated code.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> For the case of the itkPoint we were a lot more explicit, and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> added a method:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> itk::Point<T>::CastFrom( const itk::Point< R > & otherPoint );
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> See the definition in:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>              Insight/Code/Common/itkPoint.h
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in lines 212-221:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>  /** Copy from another Point with a different representation
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> type.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>  *  Casting is done with C-Like rules  */
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>  template < typename TCoordRepB >
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>  void CastFrom( const Point<TCoordRepB,NPointDimension> & pa )
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>  {
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>  for(unsigned int i=0; i<NPointDimension; i++ )
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>  {
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>  (*this)[i] = static_cast<TCoordRep>( pa[i] );
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>  }
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>  }
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I would suggest that we follow this Explicit approach for
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the Tensor classes.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Would you like to give it a try at implementing and testing
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the CastFrom() methods for these classes ?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>  Thanks
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>    Luis
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Mar 5, 2010 at 2:00 PM, Luke Bloy
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <luke.bloy at gmail.com>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The classes itkDiffusionTensor3D and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> itkSymmetricSecondRankTensor
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> don't have
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> constructors that enable casting. (
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://www.itk.org/Bug/view.php?id=10323
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ) so code such as the following fails.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>  typedef itk::SymmetricSecondRankTensor<int,3>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Int3DTensorType;
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>  typedef itk::SymmetricSecondRankTensor<float,3>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Float3DTensorType;
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>  typedef itk::SymmetricSecondRankTensor<double,3>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>  Double3DTensorType;
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>  Int3DTensorType intTensor(1);
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>  //Test constructors
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>  Float3DTensorType floatTensor(intTensor);
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>  Double3DTensorType doubleTensor(floatTensor);
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>  //test Assignment
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>  Float3DTensorType floatTensor2 = intTensor;
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> adding templated constructors and assignment operators will
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> allow
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> this type
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of behavior.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Is there a reason these constructors have been not been
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> defined?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -Luke
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Powered by www.kitware.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Kitware offers ITK Training Courses, for more information
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> visit:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://kitware.com/products/protraining.html
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Please keep messages on-topic and check the ITK FAQ at:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://www.itk.org/Wiki/ITK_FAQ
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://www.itk.org/mailman/listinfo/insight-developers
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Powered by www.kitware.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Kitware offers ITK Training Courses, for more information
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> visit:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://kitware.com/products/protraining.html
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Please keep messages on-topic and check the ITK FAQ at:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://www.itk.org/Wiki/ITK_FAQ
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://www.itk.org/mailman/listinfo/insight-developers
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>>>>>> Powered by www.kitware.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
>>>>>>>>>>>> http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Kitware offers ITK Training Courses, for more information visit:
>>>>>>>>>>>> http://kitware.com/products/protraining.html
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Please keep messages on-topic and check the ITK FAQ at:
>>>>>>>>>>>> http://www.itk.org/Wiki/ITK_FAQ
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
>>>>>>>>>>>> http://www.itk.org/mailman/listinfo/insight-developers
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>>>> Powered by www.kitware.com
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
>>>>>>>>>> http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Kitware offers ITK Training Courses, for more information visit:
>>>>>>>>>> http://kitware.com/products/protraining.html
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Please keep messages on-topic and check the ITK FAQ at:
>>>>>>>>>> http://www.itk.org/Wiki/ITK_FAQ
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
>>>>>>>>>> http://www.itk.org/mailman/listinfo/insight-developers
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Powered by www.kitware.com
>
> Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
> http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html
>
> Kitware offers ITK Training Courses, for more information visit:
> http://kitware.com/products/protraining.html
>
> Please keep messages on-topic and check the ITK FAQ at:
> http://www.itk.org/Wiki/ITK_FAQ
>
> Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
> http://www.itk.org/mailman/listinfo/insight-developers
>

More information about the Insight-developers mailing list