[Insight-developers] Linear algebra licensing and ITK 3.18 Release

[Alexandre GOUAILLARD]

hi luis,

yep, I did not do all my homework on that.

I know that the team from which OpenNL originated is very serious though.

There are two things I like about this library:
- arbitrary precision support
- CPU / GPU support

Now, as soon as I can get some times on that, I'll download it, try to
cmake it (if not already done), and ctest it, then we can check
platform support.

Tom's argument is still valid though, I does not replace the entire
linear algebra library.

alex.


On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 12:33 AM, Luis Ibanez <luis.ibanez at kitware.com> wrote:
> Tom,
>
> Excellent !,
>
> That's the kind of verification that we need
> in order to make an informed decision.
>
> Thanks for updating the table with the links
> to these Dashboards.
>
>
>      Luis
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------
> On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 12:07 PM, Tom Vercauteren
> <tom.vercauteren at m4x.org> wrote:
>> Hi Luis,
>>
>> I have updated the comparative table to have a dashboard column:
>>  http://www.itk.org/Wiki/Proposals:Sparse_Linear_Solvers#Comparative_Table
>>
>>> [...]
>>> Although, to be fair, I haven't seen such Dashboard either
>>> for any of the other candidate packages, with the sole
>>> exception of:
>>>
>>>                                  clapack
>>>
>>> whose Dashboard is actually hosted at Kitware:
>>>
>>> http://my.cdash.org/index.php?project=CLAPACK
>>
>> As now mentioned in the previous table, you will see that both eigen
>> and ublas (don't know about its bindings) are tested on several
>> platforms.
>>
>> Tom
>>
>