[Insight-developers] My first bug fix (10770)
Dženan Zukić
dzenanz at gmail.com
Wed Jun 9 08:50:14 EDT 2010
Hm, after committing the code it fails to compile on GCC (
http://www.cdash.org/CDash/viewBuildError.php?buildid=630135),
itkTriangleMeshToBinaryImageFilter.txx:441: error: expected
primary-expression before 'double'
the line is as follows:
OutputImage->TransformPhysicalPointToContinuousIndex<double>(point, ind);
However, if I remove <double>, I get following error on VS2008SP1 (x64 build
target):
itkTriangleMeshToBinaryImageFilter.txx(441) : error C2782: 'bool
itk::ImageBase<VImageDimension>::TransformPhysicalPointToContinuousIndex(const
itk::Point<TCoordRep,3> &,itk::ContinuousIndex<TCoordRep,3> &) const' :
template parameter 'TCoordRep' is ambiguous.
What is the common way of resolving this type of errors? Macros (ifdef win32
...), or attempt to comprehend all relevant template parameters of all
classes involved and try use another syntactic construct instead of explicit
template instantiation?
Regards,
Dženan
2010/6/9 Dženan Zukić <dzenanz at gmail.com>
> Hi,
>
> There is a bug in the io common test (patch attached). I will do
> experimental build on cleanly checked-out code, and if those 2 test fail (as
> I expect), I will proceed with committing the fixes to meshToImage filter
> and also to the itkiocommon test.
>
> Regards,
> Dženan
>
>
> On Tue, Jun 8, 2010 at 19:15, Casey Goodlett <casey.goodlett at kitware.com>wrote:
>
>> Hi Brad,
>>
>> I've noticed itkIOCommonTest to fail on win64 recently as well. This
>> happens when ITK_LEGACY_REMOVE is configured to true. You can observe the
>> problem under linux if you run it under valgrind as well. I think it
>> relates to allocation of some zero length c strings in the test. This is
>> occurring in a clean checkout.
>>
>> Casey
>>
>> 2010/6/8 Bradley Lowekamp <blowekamp at mail.nih.gov>
>>
>>> Hello Dženan,
>>>
>>> Congratulations on your first bug fix! It will get easier in the future
>>> when you know the system and tools a little better. I do hope that you are
>>> not including the testing as part of the "administration" costs. Testing and
>>> validations are very important things, as much of the time if it is not
>>> tested it will not be working ( or at the least it will break and no one
>>> would know ).
>>>
>>> Were the two tests failing before you made the changes?
>>>
>>> The itkImageFillBufferTest4.1 in known to fail on windows 64, but
>>> itkIOCommonTest I don't know about.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Brad
>>>
>>>
>>> On Jun 8, 2010, at 7:21 AM, Dženan Zukić wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi guys,
>>>
>>> I fixed a bug http://public.kitware.com/Bug/view.php?id=10770 (I made
>>> changes to local source code files). I made an experimental build
>>> http://www.cdash.org/CDash/buildSummary.php?buildid=629158 (release
>>> 3.18.0 with my changes), and the are 2 tests failing (they don't seem to be
>>> related to my changes though). Is that a problem?
>>>
>>> Side notes:
>>>
>>> - I downloaded and installed KWStyle version 1.0 (the only binary
>>> pre-built version from the website), but cmake whines about it being too
>>> old. I was too lazy to configure and build it from source, so I used the
>>> online tool for checking the 2 changed files.
>>> - It took me maybe 10 minutes to correct the code, but nearly a day
>>> for all the administrative work around it :D
>>>
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Dženan
>>> <itkTriangleMeshToBinaryImageFilter.patch><ATT00001..txt>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Powered by www.kitware.com
>>>
>>> Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
>>> http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html
>>>
>>> Kitware offers ITK Training Courses, for more information visit:
>>> http://kitware.com/products/protraining.html
>>>
>>> Please keep messages on-topic and check the ITK FAQ at:
>>> http://www.itk.org/Wiki/ITK_FAQ
>>>
>>> Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
>>> http://www.itk.org/mailman/listinfo/insight-developers
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.itk.org/mailman/private/insight-developers/attachments/20100609/e3f0729d/attachment.htm>
More information about the Insight-developers
mailing list