[Insight-developers] Dashboard Cleanup: mini0.nlm MacOSX-cross-rosetta : 50 tests failing

[Michel Audette]

Hi gents,

I'm about half-way through a re-commit of Sourceforge Teem files, with
the exception of sane.c and its enum in NrrdIO.h, which were isolated
as the culprit (foreseeably, based on the errors that Brad was
getting). See updated wiki:
http://www.itk.org/Wiki/Proposals:Updating_Nrrd_library_2009

I'm getting clean ctests so far on Linux and cross-compiled Mac:
http://www.cdash.org/CDash/viewTest.php?onlypassed&buildid=524950
http://www.cdash.org/CDash/viewTest.php?onlypassed&buildid=524973

I'm also about to build and ctest the result on Windows 64 bits.

My plan is to commit the rest of the files tomorrow, unless there is a
problem on Windows, and revisit sane.c with you both after that.

Best wishes,

Michel

On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 7:32 AM, Michel Audette
<michel.audette at kitware.com> wrote:
> Hi gents,
>
> it turned out that the new sane.c and its corresponding enum in
> NrrdIO.h were the culprits. The latest commit of these changes caused
> the problems on dashmacmini3 cross-compiled platform,
> http://www.cdash.org/CDash/viewTest.php?onlyfailed&buildid=524802
> while other file commits up till then went fine.
>
> I will commit the old version of sane.c and NrrdIO.h, and propose to
> commit other files, one by one, while validating with ctest as I'm
> doing now with Linux and cross-compiled Mac builds, as well as
> periodically on Windows.
>
> Gordon, perhaps you can take a fresh look at sane.c and the enum used
> there, and arrive at a solution with Brad on the cross-compiled Mac?
>
> Cheers,
>
> Michel
>
> On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 4:22 PM, Bradley Lowekamp
> <blowekamp at mail.nih.gov> wrote:
>> I fired off the following:
>> ctest -j2 -D Continuous -R Nrrd
>> I am not entirely sure what that's going to do, but hopefully it'll give you
>> the feedback you need.
>> B
>>
>> On Jan 26, 2010, at 4:14 PM, Michel Audette wrote:
>>
>> Brilliant. I'll push on with more commits, and try to replicate what
>> you were seeing, on the basis of these incremental commits.
>>
>> On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 4:07 PM, Bradley Lowekamp
>> <blowekamp at mail.nih.gov> wrote:
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>> mini0 just finished. Looks good:
>>
>> http://www.cdash.org/CDash/buildSummary.php?buildid=524022
>>
>> Brad
>>
>> On Jan 26, 2010, at 2:55 PM, Michel Audette wrote:
>>
>> Any news, Brad?
>>
>> Cheers,
>>
>> Michel
>>
>> On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 1:27 PM, Bradley Lowekamp <blowekamp at mail.nih.gov>
>>
>> wrote:
>>
>> Working on the build now...
>>
>> On Jan 26, 2010, at 12:37 PM, Michel Audette wrote:
>>
>> Hi Brad,
>>
>> I've added a few NrrdIO files to yesterday's repository, and so far I'm
>>
>> not seeing NrrdIO-related ctest problems on dashmacmini3.
>>
>> Do you have time to do a check-out and give it a try? I'd like to proceed
>>
>> incrementally with your help as final arbiter.
>>
>> I'd like to commit a few more this afternoon, after I hear back from you.
>>
>> Cheers,
>>
>> Michel
>>
>> On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 12:09 PM, Bradley Lowekamp
>>
>> <blowekamp at mail.nih.gov> wrote:
>>
>> I quickly ran NrrdIO::airSanity(). It returned 7:
>>
>>  airInsane_AIR_NAN,       /*  7: airFPClass_f(AIR_QNAN,AIR_SNAN) wrong */
>>
>> So that mean that the endianness was correct.
>>
>> I am not sure what changes this update made that would cause this system
>>
>> to fail all NRRD IO.
>>
>> Brad
>>
>>
>> On Jan 20, 2010, at 11:19 AM, Luis Ibanez wrote:
>>
>> Brad,
>>
>> Thanks a lot for looking into this.
>>
>> Is there something that we could do
>>
>> on our side to track the problem down ?
>>
>> Michel:   Could you please follow on this ?
>>
>>
>>     Thanks
>>
>>
>>            Luis
>>
>>
>> -----------------------------------
>>
>> On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 9:43 AM, Bradley Lowekamp
>>
>> <blowekamp at mail.nih.gov> wrote:
>>
>> The occurred with the NRRD upgrade.
>>
>> Due to the oddness of the cross build,  (Building for ppc, but running
>>
>> on an intel) one of the first things I'd check is that the endianess is
>>
>> handled correctly. That is is should be a compile time check for apple
>>
>> systems. ITK does this correctly, but NRRD may do it differently.
>>
>> Brad
>>
>> On Jan 20, 2010, at 8:36 AM, Luis Ibanez wrote:
>>
>> Hi Brad,
>>
>> There are 50 tests failing in
>>
>>   mini0.nlm
>>
>>   MacOSX-cross-rosetta
>>
>>
>> Most of them seem to be related to IO tests.
>>
>> http://www.cdash.org/CDash/viewTest.php?onlyfailed&buildid=519324
>>
>>
>> Do you have any hint on what may be the source of the problem ?
>>
>>
>>   Thanks
>>
>>
>>      Luis
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>>
>> Michel Audette, Ph.D.
>>
>> R & D Engineer,
>>
>> Kitware Inc.,
>>
>> Chapel Hill, N.C.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>>
>> Michel Audette, Ph.D.
>>
>> R & D Engineer,
>>
>> Kitware Inc.,
>>
>> Chapel Hill, N.C.
>>
>>
>> ========================================================
>>
>> Bradley Lowekamp
>>
>> Lockheed Martin Contractor for
>>
>> Office of High Performance Computing and Communications
>>
>> National Library of Medicine
>>
>> blowekamp at mail.nih.gov
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Michel Audette, Ph.D.
>> R & D Engineer,
>> Kitware Inc.,
>> Chapel Hill, N.C.
>>
>> ========================================================
>>
>> Bradley Lowekamp
>>
>> Lockheed Martin Contractor for
>>
>> Office of High Performance Computing and Communications
>>
>> National Library of Medicine
>>
>> blowekamp at mail.nih.gov
>>
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Michel Audette, Ph.D.
> R & D Engineer,
> Kitware Inc.,
> Chapel Hill, N.C.
>



-- 
Michel Audette, Ph.D.
R & D Engineer,
Kitware Inc.,
Chapel Hill, N.C.